USPTO Examiner RASHEED JAMAAL - Art Unit 2973

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29996955AIR PURIFIERApril 2025December 2025Allow900NoNo
29995970Air PurifierMarch 2025December 2025Allow900NoNo
29994638Air PurifierMarch 2025January 2026Allow1000YesNo
29992658FAUCETMarch 2025November 2025Allow800NoNo
29947605FAUCETJune 2024November 2025Allow1700NoNo
29946536Shower columnJune 2024November 2025Allow1700YesNo
29946533FaucetJune 2024October 2025Allow1610NoNo
29944820TUB FILLERMay 2024November 2025Allow1700NoNo
35521281Control handle for tapMay 2024September 2025Allow1610NoNo
35521295Control handle for tapMay 2024September 2025Allow1610NoNo
29942749FAUCETMay 2024November 2025Allow1800NoNo
29941034FAUCETMay 2024October 2025Allow1700YesNo
29940519FAUCETMay 2024November 2025Allow1800YesNo
29940250SINK FAUCETMay 2024November 2025Allow1800YesNo
29940248SINK FAUCETMay 2024October 2025Allow1800NoNo
29938160FaucetApril 2024October 2025Allow1800NoNo
29908285FaucetJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2110NoNo
29907934FaucetJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2100NoNo
29918643FAUCETNovember 2023November 2025Allow2311NoNo
29877784Control Panel for Fluid Distribution EquipmentJune 2023December 2025Allow3000NoNo
29877082FAUCETJune 2023June 2025Allow2510NoNo
29859416FAUCET HUBNovember 2022September 2025Allow3410NoNo
29849996FAUCET BODYAugust 2022March 2025Allow3110NoNo
29830567PLUMBING FIXTUREMarch 2022October 2025Allow4310NoNo
29826770FAUCETFebruary 2022October 2025Allow4400NoNo
29820289FaucetDecember 2021September 2025Allow4510NoNo
29790302Faucet handleNovember 2021June 2025Allow4310NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner RASHEED, JAMAAL - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RASHEED, JAMAAL works in Art Unit 2973 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RASHEED, JAMAAL's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RASHEED, JAMAAL receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RASHEED, JAMAAL is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.