USPTO Examiner FITTAHY ASSAM YAHIA - Art Unit 2973

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29993319HUMIDIFIERMarch 2025December 2025Allow900NoNo
35524116Drainage strainerJanuary 2025November 2025Allow1000NoNo
29975783SPACE HEATERDecember 2024December 2025Allow1200NoNo
29974180BURNERNovember 2024December 2025Allow1300NoNo
29973581HumidifierNovember 2024December 2025Allow1300NoNo
29972633SPACE HEATERNovember 2024December 2025Allow1300NoNo
29972033HUMIDIFIERNovember 2024December 2025Allow1300NoNo
29969786FaucetOctober 2024October 2025Allow1200NoNo
29968406FaucetOctober 2024October 2025Allow1200NoNo
29957858FAUCETAugust 2024December 2025Allow1600NoNo
29957061FAUCET KITAugust 2024December 2025Allow1600NoNo
29956886NECK FANAugust 2024December 2024Allow400NoNo
29956313FAUCETAugust 2024December 2025Allow1600NoNo
29956069FAUCETAugust 2024December 2025Allow1600NoNo
29953567FaucetJuly 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
29951698FAUCETJuly 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
29951690FAUCETJuly 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
29950935FAUCETJuly 2024November 2025Allow1600NoNo
29949351Sewer pipe coverJune 2024December 2025Allow1801YesNo
29947262Multifunctional Shower ElbowJune 2024December 2025Allow1800NoNo
29926221HARD FUEL LINEJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2110NoNo
29911338Fluted Towel Warming ContainerSeptember 2023December 2025Allow2700YesNo
29909651FRAME SEALAugust 2023October 2025Allow2600YesNo
29880980Portable Air ConditionerJuly 2023September 2025Allow2610NoNo
29761130MOISTURE DEFLECTORDecember 2020October 2025Allow5911NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner FITTAHY, ASSAM YAHIA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner FITTAHY, ASSAM YAHIA works in Art Unit 2973 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 59 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner FITTAHY, ASSAM YAHIA's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by FITTAHY, ASSAM YAHIA receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by FITTAHY, ASSAM YAHIA is 59 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.