USPTO Examiner AMAN ANNA KATHY - Art Unit 2973

Examiner Information

Name: AMAN, ANNA KATHY
Art Unit: 2973
Total Cases: 1
Last Active: April 2025

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
30001850BLOWERApril 2025November 2025Allow600NoNo
29990957Towel WarmerFebruary 2025November 2025Allow900NoNo
29985781HEATERJanuary 2025December 2025Allow1100NoNo
29983666Sauna heaterJanuary 2025October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29983650Steaming boxJanuary 2025October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29983665Sauna steamerJanuary 2025October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29983671Sauna heaterJanuary 2025October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29983668Sauna heaterJanuary 2025October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29983669Sauna heaterJanuary 2025October 2025Allow1000NoNo
29983162SPACE HEATERJanuary 2025November 2025Allow1000NoNo
29982663SPACE HEATERJanuary 2025November 2025Allow1000NoNo
29982659SPACE HEATERJanuary 2025November 2025Allow1000NoNo
29982661SPACE HEATERJanuary 2025November 2025Allow1000NoNo
29976527HEATER FAN TRAY BRACKETDecember 2024January 2026Allow1410NoNo
29975389HEATERNovember 2024November 2025Allow1100NoNo
29972018HOT WATER TANK HOUSINGNovember 2024November 2025Allow1220YesNo
29965784RV Tank Water HeaterSeptember 2024December 2025Allow1500NoNo
29956123AIR CONDITIONING DUCT FOR CONSTRUCTION MACHINEAugust 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
29956070Electric HeaterAugust 2024December 2025Allow1700NoNo
29954283Heater For Electric FireplaceJuly 2024October 2025Allow1500NoNo
35522612Pellet torchJuly 2024November 2025Allow1610NoNo
29947979SAUNA HEATERJune 2024October 2025Allow1600NoNo
29944905PATIO HEATERMay 2024November 2025Allow1700NoNo
35525051Heat pump water heaterMay 2024March 2026Allow2200NoNo
35525003Water heaterMay 2024March 2026Allow1000NoNo
29933031SMOKELESS FIRE PITMarch 2024November 2025Allow2000NoNo
35520494Main body of immersion heaterFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2101NoNo
35521582Heating equipmentFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2301NoNo
29926817PORTABLE GAS FIRE PITFebruary 2024December 2025Allow2310NoNo
29899310HANGING FIREPLACEAugust 2023October 2025Allow2600NoNo
29881553SAUNA STOVE TENTJanuary 2023January 2026Allow3730YesNo
29745975PROPULSION DEVICE FOR A BOATAugust 2020March 2025Allow5510YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner AMAN, ANNA KATHY - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner AMAN, ANNA KATHY works in Art Unit 2973 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 55 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner AMAN, ANNA KATHY's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by AMAN, ANNA KATHY receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AMAN, ANNA KATHY is 55 months. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 33% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 200.0% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.