USPTO Examiner HERZOG ROSE - Art Unit 2939

Examiner Information

Name: HERZOG, ROSE
Art Unit: 2939
Total Cases: 5
Last Active: April 2025

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29996727BRAApril 2025May 2025Allow100NoNo
29986290Shaping BeltJanuary 2025July 2025Allow600NoNo
29965858Eyeglasses caseSeptember 2024September 2025Allow1100NoNo
29963722RIDING JEANSSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1310YesNo
29963214EYEWEAR CASESeptember 2024September 2025Allow1200NoNo
29925859Wearable BlanketJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2000NoNo
29925675Wearable BlanketJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2000NoNo
29925485Wearable BlanketJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2100NoNo
29908739Shaping JumpsuitJanuary 2024July 2025Allow1810NoNo
29908734Shaping GarmentJanuary 2024July 2025Allow1810NoNo
29912047Inflatable costumeSeptember 2023July 2025Allow2200NoNo
29891585BRALETTEMay 2023July 2025Allow2600NoNo
29819015UNDERWEAR WITH POUCH WITH CURVED DOUBLE DARTSDecember 2021September 2025Allow4500NoNo
29789871GARMENTOctober 2021July 2025Allow4500NoNo
29796696Flip Hat MaskJune 2021April 2025Allow4500NoNo
29787988Swimming capJune 2021July 2025Allow4900NoNo
29788328BANDANA ASSEMBLYMay 2021October 2025Allow5300NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner HERZOG, ROSE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HERZOG, ROSE works in Art Unit 2939 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HERZOG, ROSE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HERZOG, ROSE receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HERZOG, ROSE is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 80.0% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.