USPTO Examiner MILLER BRETT A - Art Unit 2934

Examiner Information

Name: MILLER, BRETT A
Art Unit: 2934
Total Cases: 1
Last Active: February 2025

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
35524308Bar gazeboFebruary 2025March 2026Allow1200NoNo
35523657Office soundproof compartmentJanuary 2025December 2025Allow1100NoNo
35523211Beach changing boothOctober 2024March 2026Allow1700NoNo
29961871BUILDING WITH LIGHTING EFFECTSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29950411POOL SAFETY FRAMEJuly 2024November 2025Allow1600NoNo
29950418POOL SAFETY FRAMEJuly 2024November 2025Allow1600NoNo
29912753BUILDINGSeptember 2023October 2025Allow2500NoNo
29880863POOL COVERJuly 2023December 2025Allow2910NoNo
29855586StructureOctober 2022October 2025Allow3600YesNo
29855583StructureOctober 2022October 2025Allow3600YesNo
29853628Building StructureSeptember 2022October 2025Allow3700NoNo
29825723BUILDING STRUCTUREFebruary 2022October 2025Allow4410YesNo
29821401Prefabricated Building ModuleDecember 2021September 2025Allow4501NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner MILLER, BRETT A - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MILLER, BRETT A works in Art Unit 2934 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MILLER, BRETT A's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MILLER, BRETT A receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MILLER, BRETT A is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 31% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.