USPTO Examiner KO ELIZABETH SUN - Art Unit 2924

Examiner Information

Name: KO, ELIZABETH SUN
Art Unit: 2924
Total Cases: 1
Last Active: December 2024

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29981065Impact WrenchDecember 2024October 2025Allow900NoNo
29981064Electric WrenchDecember 2024October 2025Allow900NoNo
29981063ELECTRIC HAMMERDecember 2024October 2025Allow900NoNo
29981060ELECTRIC DRILLDecember 2024October 2025Allow900NoNo
29980841ELECTRIC HAMMERDecember 2024October 2025Allow900NoNo
29981052Electric DrillDecember 2024October 2025Allow900NoNo
29981050Power ScrewdriverDecember 2024October 2025Allow900NoNo
29981043Electric PickDecember 2024October 2025Allow900NoNo
29949527COMPONENT FOR A LOCKJune 2024September 2025Allow1500NoNo
29895744RETAINER SLEEVEJune 2023October 2025Allow2700NoNo
29895752RETAINER SLEEVEJune 2023October 2025Allow2700YesNo
29895753RETAINER SLEEVEJune 2023October 2025Allow2700YesNo
29894436CURTAIN POSITION LIMITING DEVICEJune 2023September 2025Allow2800NoNo
29890715SMART LOCKApril 2023October 2025Allow2910NoNo
29873663HOSE CLIP WITH LANYARDApril 2023September 2025Allow3000NoNo
29776675MOUNTING BRACKETMarch 2021October 2025Allow5401NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner KO, ELIZABETH SUN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KO, ELIZABETH SUN works in Art Unit 2924 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 54 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KO, ELIZABETH SUN's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KO, ELIZABETH SUN receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KO, ELIZABETH SUN is 54 months. This places the examiner in the 2% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 200.0% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.