USPTO Examiner KADOO RENE H - Art Unit 2924

Examiner Information

Name: KADOO, RENE H
Art Unit: 2924
Total Cases: 1
Last Active: August 2024

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29959943Digging shovelAugust 2024October 2025Allow1400NoNo
29956677Grass TrimmerAugust 2024December 2025Allow1600NoNo
35523060Accessory For Faucet AeratorAugust 2024December 2025Allow1201NoNo
35523042Adapter for faucet aeratorAugust 2024December 2025Allow1301NoNo
29951430GARDEN SHEARSJuly 2024October 2025Allow1600NoNo
29944057SCREWMay 2024November 2025Allow1810NoNo
35519686CorkscrewDecember 2023November 2025Allow2220NoNo
29883993CORNER BRACE ASSEMBLYFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3300NoNo
29870059Folding Mechanism of Folding ChairJanuary 2023November 2025Allow3400NoNo
29881564FASTENING DEVICEJanuary 2023November 2025Allow3500NoNo
29863932MASONRY REINFORCEMENTDecember 2022November 2025Allow3500NoNo
29867424CHAIR ADJUSTOROctober 2022November 2025Allow3700NoNo
29852632LOCKING SCREWSeptember 2022October 2025Allow3700NoNo
29851968MOUNTING DEVICESeptember 2022January 2025Allow2800NoNo
29851744LOPPERAugust 2022October 2025Allow3800YesNo
29848807CORNERBEAD FOR DRYWALLAugust 2022October 2025Allow3900NoNo
29847747FASTENERJuly 2022January 2026Allow4200NoNo
29844544Overhang Accessory for ChairsJune 2022November 2025Allow4110NoNo
29810481EUROBOX HOLDEROctober 2021October 2025Allow4910YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner KADOO, RENE H - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KADOO, RENE H works in Art Unit 2924 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 49 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KADOO, RENE H's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KADOO, RENE H receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KADOO, RENE H is 49 months. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.