Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 29991443 | VEHICLE CROSS BAR | February 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 35522460 | Inhaler | August 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 29935605 | DRIVING RECORDER CASE | April 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29925406 | HOSE HANGER FOR A CPAP MACHINE | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29924255 | RAFTER FASTENER FOR SOLAR PANEL | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 35519927 | Nebulizer | November 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 29913518 | Combined Disposable Diaper Changing Pad and Bag | October 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29913309 | DRUG CARTRIDGE HOUSING | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 27 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 35521604 | Part of endoscope tip | June 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 35521587 | Part of endoscope tip | June 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29894683 | Grill Vent Adapter for Smoker Conversion | June 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29876232 | Integrated Mixing Cup | May 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 35520624 | Control cabinet for intraoral scanner | April 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 32 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15982388 | Heat Exchanger | May 2018 | August 2018 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15535772 | HEAT EXCHANGER | June 2017 | November 2018 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15514523 | COMPACT HEAT EXCHANGE SYSTEM AND METHOD OF COOLING | March 2017 | August 2018 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15440123 | CONCEALED HEATING SYSTEM | February 2017 | October 2018 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15364246 | THERMAL RESERVOIR FOR A STEAM ENGINE | November 2016 | April 2019 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15127590 | THERMAL CONTROL SYSTEM OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE | September 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12656803 | DRILLED AND INTEGRATED SECONDARY FUEL NOZZLE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD | February 2010 | March 2011 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12216079 | QUICK CONNECTION DEVICE FOR ELECTRIC SPRAY GUN | June 2008 | August 2010 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12028528 | SEAT LIFTING SYSTEM | February 2008 | September 2011 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11921138 | ELECTROSTATIC ATOMIZING DEVICE AND AIR BLOWER USING THE SAME | November 2007 | September 2010 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11764103 | SPRINKLER MOUNT | June 2007 | February 2011 | Allow | 44 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 11269938 | ACCESSORIES FOR WATER AND BEVERAGE BOTTLES | November 2005 | August 2009 | Allow | 45 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner JONAITIS, JUSTIN M works in Art Unit 2924 and has examined 12 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 26 months.
Examiner JONAITIS, JUSTIN M's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by JONAITIS, JUSTIN M receive 0.92 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 7% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by JONAITIS, JUSTIN M is 26 months. This places the examiner in the 77% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by JONAITIS, JUSTIN M. This interview benefit is in the 15% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 22.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 25.0% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 16.7% of allowed cases (in the 92% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.