USPTO Examiner BENNETT KAYLA MARIE - Art Unit 2924

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29996834Cable OrganizerApril 2025August 2025Allow400NoNo
29988148HOOKJanuary 2025November 2025Allow900NoNo
29981070CABLE REELDecember 2024November 2025Allow1100NoNo
29969122FASTENEROctober 2024October 2025Allow1100NoNo
29968929Door LockOctober 2024July 2025Allow910NoNo
29968914BRACKETOctober 2024July 2025Allow900NoNo
29968934Door Lock SetOctober 2024July 2025Allow920NoNo
29965478HOOKSeptember 2024November 2025Allow1300NoNo
29961686KEY TOOLSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29961138Electric ScrewdriverSeptember 2024November 2025Allow1510NoNo
29960285SAFETY SHIELD STANDOFFAugust 2024December 2025Allow1620YesNo
29953885HookJuly 2024January 2026Allow1700NoNo
29953382Hand Tool for Opening Beverage CansJuly 2024November 2025Allow1620YesNo
29952741BRACKET FOR A WOODEN POSTJuly 2024December 2025Allow1700NoNo
29952251SLAT LOCK DEVICEJuly 2024July 2025Allow1220NoNo
29948633Electric ScissorsJune 2024November 2025Allow1710NoNo
29947233VANITY BRACKETJune 2024October 2025Allow1600NoNo
29940431CORNHOLE BOARD HANGERMay 2024October 2025Allow1810NoNo
29939860HookApril 2024July 2025Allow1510NoNo
29939035ELECTRIC SCREW DRIVERApril 2024December 2025Allow2010NoNo
29935373Flagpole BracketApril 2024August 2025Allow1700NoNo
29934316Curtain Rod BracketMarch 2024August 2025Allow1700YesNo
29928412AXLE LOCK NUTFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1900NoNo
29927385ELECTRIC SCREWDRIVER ASSEMBLYFebruary 2024September 2025Allow1900NoNo
35520201Anti-loosening NutDecember 2023September 2025Allow2120YesNo
29919703Hole positionerDecember 2023July 2025Allow1900NoNo
29913003BOTTLE OPENERSeptember 2023June 2025Allow2000NoNo
29894718Helmet hookJune 2023August 2025Allow2601NoNo
29877563BRACKET FOR MODULAR STRUCTUREJune 2023June 2025Allow2410NoNo
29892620WIRE DISPENSER APPARATUSMay 2023July 2025Allow2500NoNo
29885623HOSE REELFebruary 2023November 2025Allow3330NoNo
29885627HOSE REELFebruary 2023September 2025Allow3130NoNo
29861021CASTERNovember 2022November 2025Allow3611NoNo
29861022CASTERNovember 2022November 2025Allow3610NoNo
35518927Reel for winding clipNovember 2022January 2026Allow3821YesNo
29856096BELL SEPARATOROctober 2022September 2025Allow3510NoNo
29852127Elevator MountSeptember 2022June 2025Allow3301NoNo
29848874Wall BracketAugust 2022August 2025Allow3600NoNo
29837250SUCTION MOUNTMay 2022July 2025Allow3810NoNo
29834696TUBEApril 2022July 2025Allow4000NoNo
29831898DECK FRAME BRACKETMarch 2022October 2025Allow4301NoNo
29831530Tarp HolderMarch 2022July 2025Allow4010NoNo
29829839CONNECTING RODMarch 2022August 2025Allow4120YesNo
29791768Apparatus for attaching lockbox to doorFebruary 2022August 2025Allow4220NoNo
29819600WRAP ROLLER SETDecember 2021October 2025Allow4610NoNo
29813210BRACKETOctober 2021January 2026Allow5020NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner BENNETT, KAYLA MARIE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner BENNETT, KAYLA MARIE works in Art Unit 2924 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner BENNETT, KAYLA MARIE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by BENNETT, KAYLA MARIE receive 1.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 26% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BENNETT, KAYLA MARIE is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 33.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 50% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 100.0% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.