Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35521872 | Part of a Bottle | July 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 29952509 | Bottle Adapter | July 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 29949444 | Gas Can Vent Cap | June 2024 | November 2024 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 29949031 | CAP | June 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 35523717 | Perfusion cap | January 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29911005 | LIQUID DISPENSING CLOSURE | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 35521585 | Perfume bottle | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 35520899 | Bottle cap | May 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 35520145 | Bottle | March 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 29805328 | Cupholder | August 2021 | November 2023 | Abandon | 27 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner BIRDWELL, AMANDA KAY works in Art Unit 2922 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 0.0%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.
Examiner BIRDWELL, AMANDA KAY's allowance rate of 0.0% places them in the 0% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BIRDWELL, AMANDA KAY receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 87% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BIRDWELL, AMANDA KAY is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 74% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 99% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 30% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.