Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35524131 | Radar detector mount | February 2025 | January 2026 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29966393 | Measuring Wheel | October 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29952033 | RING FOR MEASURING RING SIZE | July 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29939368 | MEASURING WHEEL | April 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29934282 | WIRE GAUGE | March 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 35522341 | Vehicle lidar | September 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 35520484 | Flowmeter | April 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 35520507 | Sample holder for measuring instruments | March 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 35520479 | Disc-shaped sample holder for measuring instruments | March 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 29863581 | Rafter Square | December 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 29797846 | Wearable Device | July 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 51 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SUITER, ANTOINETTE MARTINE works in Art Unit 2914 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.
Examiner SUITER, ANTOINETTE MARTINE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by SUITER, ANTOINETTE MARTINE receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SUITER, ANTOINETTE MARTINE is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 29% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.