USPTO Examiner RADKE JAY W - Art Unit 2827

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18975798BLOCK SELECTION CIRCUIT CONTROLLING SERIES-CONNECTED PASS TRANSISTORS USING SHARED SWITCH CIRCUIT AND FLASH MEMORY INCLUDING THE SAMEDecember 2024November 2025Allow1100YesNo
18795818MEMORY SYSTEMAugust 2024March 2026Allow1900NoNo
18788480READ AND WRITE ENHANCEMENTS FOR ARRAYS OF SUPERCONDUCTING MEMORY CELLSJuly 2024March 2026Allow1910NoNo
18772721POWER MODE WAKE-UP FOR MEMORY ON DIFFERENT POWER DOMAINSJuly 2024February 2026Allow1900YesNo
18764581MAGNETIC MEMORY AND MEMORY SYSTEMJuly 2024January 2026Allow1800YesNo
18752801MRAM CIRCUIT AND LAYOUTJune 2024December 2025Allow1800YesNo
18748051POWER MANAGEMENT INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND MEMORY MODULE INCLUDNG THE SAMEJune 2024January 2026Allow1900YesNo
18677536BLOCK SELECTION CIRCUIT CONTROLLING SERIES CONNECTED PASS TRANSISTORS AND FLASH MEMORY INCLUDING THE SAMEMay 2024November 2025Allow1800YesNo
18675997LOW POWER MANAGEMENT FOR SLEEP MODE OPERATION OF A MEMORY DEVICEMay 2024May 2025Allow1110YesNo
18669931SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICES AND MEMORY SYSTEMS INCLUDING THE SAMEMay 2024September 2025Allow1600NoNo
18668795SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DUAL STANDBY MODES IN MEMORYMay 2024November 2025Allow1800YesNo
18663114METHOD FOR MANAGING A MEMORY APPARATUSMay 2024January 2025Allow810NoNo
18658128MEMORY DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFMay 2024October 2025Allow1700YesNo
18653472MEMORY WITH REDUCED LEAKAGE THROUGH ANALOG HEAD SWITCH CONTROLMay 2024January 2026Allow2110NoNo
18652476Toggle SOT-MRAM Architecture with Self-Terminating Write OperationMay 2024February 2026Allow2110NoNo
18651218ANALOG CONTENT ADDRESSABLE MEMORY FOR GENERAL COMPUTINGApril 2024October 2025Allow1700NoNo
18635946Usage-Based Disturbance Mitigation Counter ControlApril 2024January 2026Allow2110YesNo
18632583PHASE-CHANGE MEMORY CELL AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAMEApril 2024February 2025Allow1110NoNo
18627960Data Sense Amplifier Circuit with a Hybrid ArchitectureApril 2024October 2025Allow1800YesNo
18625895SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EXTENDING LIFETIME OF MEMORY DEVICEApril 2024December 2025Allow2010NoNo
18612211SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPROVED ENDURANCE IN NON-VOLATILE MEMORY SYSTEMSMarch 2024January 2026Allow2210YesNo
18595672STORAGE SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING GENOME SEQUENCESMarch 2024November 2025Allow2010YesNo
18443347MEMORY WITH BUILT-IN SYNCHRONOUS-WRITE-THROUGH REDUNDANCY AND ASSOCIATED TEST METHODFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1800NoNo
18442027MEMORY AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF, MEMORY SYSTEM, COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMFebruary 2024October 2025Allow2000NoNo
18683278MEMORY DEVICE AND MEMORY SYSTEMFebruary 2024December 2025Allow2210NoNo
18428328DELAY CALIBRATION CIRCUIT, MEMORY, AND CLOCK SIGNAL CALIBRATION METHODJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2210NoNo
18426825MEMORY SYSTEM, OPERATING METHOD OF THE MEMORY SYSTEM, AND INTERFACE CIRCUIT OF THE MEMORY SYSTEMJanuary 2024March 2026Allow2510YesNo
18423047MEMORY SYSTEM AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2310YesNo
18403739MEMORY SYSTEM AND OPERATING METHODJanuary 2024February 2026Allow2610YesNo
18572227PHOTONIC CONTENT ADDRESSABLE MEMORYDecember 2023July 2025Allow1900NoNo
18545144SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND STORAGE SYSTEM INCLUDING SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICEDecember 2023July 2024Allow700YesNo
18541678ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING PHASE ADJUSTMENT OPERATIONDecember 2023October 2025Allow2210NoNo
18539798MULTI-SAMPLED, CHARGE-SHARING THERMOMETER IN MEMORY DEVICEDecember 2023July 2024Allow700YesNo
18538457SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE, AND SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICEDecember 2023October 2025Allow2310NoNo
18534269FERROELECTRIC FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS BASED APPROACH FOR EUCLIDEAN DISTANCE CALCULATION IN NEUROMORPHIC HARDWAREDecember 2023March 2026Allow2710YesNo
18533788SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICES HAVING ENHANCED SUB-WORD LINE DRIVERS THEREINDecember 2023March 2026Allow2720YesNo
18532826METHOD FOR MAPPING AN INPUT VECTOR TO AN OUTPUT VECTOR BY MEANS OF A MATRIX CIRCUITDecember 2023June 2025Allow1900YesNo
18533111RANDOM SWAP INJECTIONDecember 2023January 2025Allow1320NoNo
18529619NONVOLATILE MEMORY PACKAGE, STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND METHOD OF OPERATING THEREOFDecember 2023June 2025Allow1800NoNo
18525088Voltage Ramp Memory CalibrationNovember 2023June 2025Allow1800NoNo
18521851REFRESH CIRCUIT AND SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAMENovember 2023June 2025Allow1800NoNo
18520612Memory systemNovember 2023June 2024Allow700YesNo
18518578MEMORY DEVICE, MEMORY CELL READ CIRCUIT, AND CONTROL METHOD FOR MISMATCH COMPENSATIONNovember 2023October 2024Allow1110NoNo
18518302DRAM CIRCUITNovember 2023October 2025Allow2310NoNo
18518126THRESHOLD COMPENSATED DETECTOR FOR MEMORY SENSENovember 2023June 2025Allow1900NoNo
18507872PROBABILISTIC DATA INTEGRITY SCANS USING RISK FACTOR ESTIMATIONNovember 2023May 2025Allow1800NoNo
18387476LATCH TYPE SENSE AMPLIFIER FOR NON-VOLATILE MEMORYNovember 2023May 2025Allow1800NoNo
18485630SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICEOctober 2023May 2024Allow700YesNo
18477013METHOD FOR INFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON HYBRID MATERIALSeptember 2023December 2024Allow1500NoNo
18369296NEIGHBOR PLANE DISTURB (NPD) DETECTION FOR MEMORY DEVICESSeptember 2023November 2025Allow2610NoNo
18467271NONVOLATILE MEMORY AND WRITING METHODSeptember 2023August 2024Allow1110YesNo
18467047MANAGING POWER SUPPLY IN SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICESSeptember 2023September 2025Allow2410YesNo
18463975BANK TO BANK DATA TRANSFERSeptember 2023April 2025Allow1920YesNo
18456248MEMORY SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHODAugust 2023August 2025Allow2310NoNo
18456430MEMORY DEVICEAugust 2023April 2025Allow2010NoNo
18237333CIRCUIT FOR NON-DESTRUCTIVE READING OF FERROELECTRIC MEMORIESAugust 2023February 2026Allow3020YesNo
18236794METHOD FOR LAYOUT AWARE OPTIMIZATION FOR 10T NOR-TYPE CAM CELLAugust 2023December 2025Allow2720YesNo
18449725MEMORY DEVICE AND AN OPERATION METHOD THEREOFAugust 2023June 2025Allow2210YesNo
18448902MEMORY DEVICE AND ZQ CALIBRATION METHODAugust 2023June 2025Allow2210NoNo
18230859MONITORING CIRCUIT, REFRESH METHOD AND MEMORYAugust 2023May 2025Allow2210NoNo
18230096DELAY CIRCUIT AND SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORYAugust 2023January 2026Allow2900YesNo
18356786VERA DETECTION METHOD TO CATCH ERASE FAILJuly 2023March 2025Allow1910NoNo
18355642SEMICONDUCTOR APPARATUS AND SYSTEMJuly 2023November 2024Allow1600NoNo
18347378METHOD FOR FINDING COMMON OPTIMAL READ REFERENCE VOLTAGE OF MULTI-DIES, STORAGE SYSTEMJuly 2023September 2025Allow2610NoNo
18218122METHOD FOR MANAGING A MEMORY APPARATUSJuly 2023February 2024Allow700NoNo
18216499REGISTER, FLOP, AND LATCH DESIGNS INLCUDING FERROELECTRIC AND LINEAR DIELECTRICSJune 2023February 2025Allow2010YesNo
18343675MEMORY DEVICEJune 2023November 2025Allow2900YesNo
18266782SIGNAL SKEW CORRECTION IN INTEGRATED CIRCUIT MEMORY DEVICESJune 2023January 2026Allow3110NoNo
18332948MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDED IN MEMORY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING FAIL MEMORY CELL THEREOFJune 2023July 2025Allow2510YesNo
18331493CAPACITOR, METHOD OF CONTROLLING THE SAME, AND TRANSISTOR INCLUDING THE SAMEJune 2023December 2023Allow600YesNo
18330353MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR REDUCING ACTIVE POWER CONSUMPTION THEREOF USING ADDRESS CONTROLJune 2023April 2025Allow2300NoNo
18204020NEUROMORPHIC DEVICEMay 2023November 2024Allow1800NoNo
18201057SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SPIN ORBIT TORQUE BASED MEMORY DEVICEMay 2023March 2025Allow2200YesNo
18195418Memory Repair DeviceMay 2023August 2025Allow2720NoNo
18312037MEMORY DEVICE AND ERASING METHOD THEREOFMay 2023March 2025Allow2210NoNo
18303016ANALOG PEAK POWER MANAGEMENT FOR MULTI-DIE OPERATIONSApril 2023April 2025Allow2420NoNo
18031487FLASH MEMORY DEVICE WITH PHOTON ASSISTED PROGRAMMINGApril 2023August 2025Allow2820NoNo
18190511SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICEMarch 2023May 2025Allow2620NoNo
18188804MEMORY WITH ONE-TIME PROGRAMMABLE (OTP) CELLSMarch 2023October 2024Allow1800NoNo
18188978SYNAPTIC ARRAY FOR FIELD-TRAINING-CAPABLE IN-MEMORY COMPUTING USING NON-VOLATILE MEMORY TECHNOLOGIESMarch 2023February 2025Allow2310YesNo
18182956STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY WITH WRITE ASSIST ADJUSTMENTMarch 2023December 2024Allow2130YesNo
18116823MEMORY DEVICE OF REDUCING THE NUMBER OF CALIBRATION RESISTORS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFMarch 2023January 2025Allow2210NoNo
18175514REDUCING PRECHARGE CURRENT SURGE IN DIGITAL COMPUTE IN MEMORYFebruary 2023April 2025Allow2510NoNo
18173499SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND MEMORY SYSTEMFebruary 2023December 2023Allow901NoNo
18172308MEMORY DEVICEFebruary 2023October 2025Abandon3220NoNo
18171121MEMORY DEVICE REFRESH OPERATIONSFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2500NoNo
18170925MULTI-RAIL SENSE CIRCUIT WITH PRE-CHARGE TRANSISTORS AND MEMORY CIRCUIT INCORPORATING THE SENSE CIRCUITFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2520NoNo
18171106SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WRITING AND READING DATA STORED IN A POLYMERFebruary 2023October 2023Allow810NoNo
18169635SELECTIVE PER DIE DRAM PPR FOR MEMORY DEVICEFebruary 2023February 2025Allow2410NoNo
18104201DOUBLE SINGLE LEVEL CELL PROGRAM IN A MEMORY DEVICEJanuary 2023April 2025Allow2610YesNo
18161274SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICEJanuary 2023July 2023Allow500YesNo
18160620NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING THE NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICEJanuary 2023January 2024Allow1120YesNo
18100806ACTIVATE COMMANDS FOR MEMORY PREPARATIONJanuary 2023February 2025Allow2410NoNo
180985482T-1R ARCHITECTURE FOR RESISTIVE RAMJanuary 2023October 2023Allow910NoNo
18091002Histogram Creation Process for Memory DevicesDecember 2022September 2023Allow800YesNo
18091131ARCHITECTURE AND METHOD FOR NAND MEMORY OPERATIONDecember 2022December 2025Allow3610YesNo
18089512METHOD FOR READING MEMORY, A MEMORY, A MEMORY SYSTEM, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEDecember 2022January 2025Allow2410NoNo
18145629HIGH VOLTAGE SWITCHES FOR NAND FLASH MEMORYDecember 2022September 2025Allow3220NoNo
18084570MEMORY DEVICE, SENSE AMPLIFIER AND METHOD FOR MISMATCH COMPENSATIONDecember 2022September 2023Allow910NoNo
18082480HIGHLY ENERGY-EFFICIENT CAM BASED ON SINGLE FEFET AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFDecember 2022October 2024Allow2210NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RADKE, JAY W.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
7
Examiner Affirmed
6
(85.7%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(14.3%)
Reversal Percentile
26.2%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 14.3% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
20
Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(20.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
16
(80.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
25.5%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 20.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner RADKE, JAY W - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RADKE, JAY W works in Art Unit 2827 and has examined 925 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 87.1%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 20 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RADKE, JAY W's allowance rate of 87.1% places them in the 66% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RADKE, JAY W receive 1.42 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 23% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RADKE, JAY W is 20 months. This places the examiner in the 93% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +5.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RADKE, JAY W. This interview benefit is in the 30% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 52.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 28.6% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 31% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 56.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 44.4% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 60.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 65% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 4.9% of allowed cases (in the 85% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.5% of allowed cases (in the 79% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.