Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18612239 | NONVOLATILE SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18392161 | Matrix-Vector Multiplications Based on Charge-Summing Memory Cell Strings | December 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18226656 | SEMICONDUCTOR ELEMENT MEMORY DEVICE | July 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18331633 | SRAM INTERNAL DFT CIRCUIT WITHOUT OUTPUT HOLD DEGRADATION | June 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18324850 | LATCH DEVICE, IN PARTICULAR FOR ROW DECODING AND COLUMN DECODING OF AN EEPROM MEMORY PLANE | May 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18321791 | FLASH MEMORY | May 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18307690 | DETECTION OF LEAKAGE CURRENT IN FLASH MEMORY | April 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18136507 | IN-MEMORY COMPUTATION CIRCUIT USING STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (SRAM) ARRAY SEGMENTATION AND LOCAL COMPUTE TILE READ BASED ON WEIGHTED CURRENT | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18190577 | MEMORY DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | March 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18027268 | NON-VOLATILE MEMORY | March 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18184602 | DYNAMIC ROWHAMMER MANAGEMENT WITH PER-ROW HAMMER TRACKING | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18182588 | SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE AND MEMORY SYSTEM | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18072681 | ULTRA-COMPACT CAM ARRAY BASED ON SINGLE MTJ AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | November 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17973988 | PAGE BUFFER CIRCUIT AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | October 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17938153 | APPARATUS WITH MULTI-DECK READ LEVEL MANAGEMENT AND METHODS FOR OPERATING THE SAME | October 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17959356 | SPIKING NEURAL NETWORK DEVICE, NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE, AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | October 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17956409 | GATE-INDUCED DRAIN LEAKAGE PRE-CHARGE IN SUB-BLOCK MODE FOR THREE OR MORE TIER NON-VOLATILE MEMORY STRUCTURE | September 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 17954757 | CONFIGURABLE CAPACITORS WITH 3D NON-VOLATILE ARRAY | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17880254 | MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ROW HAMMER | August 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17814640 | MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DYNAMIC VOLTAGE FREQUENCY SCALING OPERATIONS BASED ON HOST CONFIGURATION | July 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17868695 | APPARATUS WITH TIMING CONTROL FOR A DIE GROUPING | July 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17859351 | MEMORY MODULE INCLUDING POWER LINE FOR SUPPLYING POWER TO MEMORY DEVICES | July 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17844450 | ADDRESS MAPPING FOR IMPROVED MEMORY RELIABILITY | June 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17657814 | REDUCED WORD LINE VOLTAGE DURING DISCHARGE PHASE OF READ OPERATION | April 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17651597 | COMPILATION METHOD, COMPILATION CIRCUIT, MODE REGISTER AND MEMORY | February 2022 | May 2024 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17580105 | MANAGING AN ADAPTIVE DATA PATH SELECTION THRESHOLD FOR A MEMORY SUB-SYSTEM | January 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 2 | Yes | No |
| 17472412 | HYBRID COMPUTE-IN-MEMORY | September 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 51 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner WELLS, JAMES STEVEN works in Art Unit 2825 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.
Examiner WELLS, JAMES STEVEN's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by WELLS, JAMES STEVEN receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WELLS, JAMES STEVEN is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 31% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.