Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18654012 | NONVOLATILE MEMORY READ WITH ASYMMETRIC READ-PASS VOLTAGES | May 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18586943 | Data Storage Device and Method for Managing a Hot Count Difference in Sub-Block Mode | February 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18531731 | MEMORY DEVICE AND NOISE SUPPRESSION METHOD THEREOF | December 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18518051 | MULTILEVEL PLATE LINE DECODING | November 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18510656 | DATA STORAGE DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | November 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18488045 | MEMORY DEVICE AND PROGRAMMING METHOD THEREOF | October 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18365771 | CENTRALIZED PLACEMENT OF COMMAND AND ADDRESS SIGNALS IN DEVICES AND SYSTEMS | August 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18347401 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH TRANSFER CIRCUITS AND OPERATING METHOD INCLUDING ASJUSTMENT OF TRANFER CONTROL SIGNAL AND PROGRAM PULSE | July 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18346347 | SEPARATE PEAK CURRENT CHECKPOINTS FOR CLOSED AND OPEN BLOCK READ ICC COUNTERMEASURES IN NAND MEMORY | July 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18270114 | MAGNETIC ARRAY, MAGNETIC ARRAY CONTROL METHOD, AND MAGNETIC ARRAY CONTROL PROGRAM | June 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18338676 | POWER REGULATION SYSTEM FOR MEMORY OPERATION INCLUDING A TEMPERATURE COMPENSATION CIRCUIT FOR REFERENCE AND BIAS VOLTAGE GENERATION | June 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18337926 | MEMORY DEVICE WITH STACKED BODY ORTHOGONAL TO SUBSTRATE AND METHOD USING WRITE AND EASE PAGE REFRESH OPERATIONS | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18207979 | OPERATION METHOD OF MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING MEMORY BLOCK CONNECTED TO WORDLINES | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18331570 | RESISTIVE RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY BASED ONE-TIME-PROGRAMMABLE MEMORY DEVICES | June 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18144858 | PMOS VOLTAGE SELECTION CIRCUIT WITH AN AUXILIARY SELECTION CIRCUIT TO PREVENT A FLOATING OUTPUT | May 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18313684 | SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING RESISTIVE RANDOM ACCESS NONVOLATILE MEMORY FOR INCREASING READOUT MARGIN | May 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18137191 | BIT LINE VOLTAGE CLAMPING READ CIRCUIT FOR AN IN-MEMORY COMPUTE OPERATION WHERE SIMULTANEOUS ACCESS IS MADE TO PLURAL ROWS OF A STATIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (SRAM) | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18183177 | STACKED MEMORY WITH A TIMING ADJUSTMENT FUNCTION | March 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18167436 | BIT LINE SENSE AMPLIFIER AND BIT LINE SENSING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE | February 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 26 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18106872 | DEVICES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR CALIBRATING A READ VOLTAGE USED FOR READING MEMORY CELLS | February 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18163846 | SEMICONDUCTOR STORAGE DEVICE | February 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 18093560 | MEMORY DEVICE AND MEMORY SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME | January 2023 | March 2024 | Allow | 14 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18148333 | SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE PERFORMING A MULTIPLICATION AND ACCUMULATION OPERATION | December 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18091215 | MEMORY CONTROLLER AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF, AND MEMORY SYSTEM | December 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18146864 | APPARATUS AND METHOD TO IMPROVE SENSING NOISE MARGIN IN A NON-LINEAR POLAR MATERIAL BASED BIT-CELL | December 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18074280 | NONVOLATILE SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING A DATA STORING CAPACITOR IN EACH PAGE BUFFER | December 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17979179 | MEMORY DEVICE INCLUDING ASYMMETRIC GROUND SELECTION LINES | November 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17931945 | MEMORY SYSTEM AND NON-VOLATILE MEMORY USING SOFT BIT DATA INFORMATION TO IMPROVE MEMORY OPERATION | September 2022 | April 2025 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17889214 | READ VERIFICATION CADENCE AND TIMING IN MEMORY DEVICES | August 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17064671 | ENVELOPE BASED SAMPLE CORRECTION FOR DIGITAL FLOW METROLOGY | October 2020 | July 2025 | Allow | 57 | 6 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner AGGER, ELIZABETH ROSE.
With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner AGGER, ELIZABETH ROSE works in Art Unit 2824 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 57 months.
Examiner AGGER, ELIZABETH ROSE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 96% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by AGGER, ELIZABETH ROSE receive 6.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 100% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by AGGER, ELIZABETH ROSE is 57 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.7% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 31% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.