USPTO Examiner TURNER BRIAN - Art Unit 2818

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17120499Semiconductor Device and Method of ManufactureDecember 2020April 2024Allow4060YesNo
17110298PIXEL STRUCTURE TO IMPROVE BSI GLOBAL SHUTTER EFFICIENCYDecember 2020September 2024Allow4560NoNo
17050817DISPLAY DEVICEOctober 2020April 2024Allow4220NoNo
16967495COMPONENT PRODUCING METHOD, HOLDING FILM, AND HOLDING TOOL FORMING DEVICEAugust 2020May 2024Allow4650YesNo
16920721Strained Semiconductor FET Devices with Epitaxial Quality ImprovementJuly 2020October 2024Allow5171YesNo
16885526METHOD OF PROCESSING A WORKPIECE AND SYSTEM FOR PROCESSING A WORKPIECEMay 2020October 2024Allow5360YesNo
16707118SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF FABRICATING THE SAMEDecember 2019March 2025Allow6061YesYes
16526756FINFET SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJuly 2019November 2024Allow60120YesNo
16116412METHODS OF PRODUCING SELF-ALIGNED VIASAugust 2018August 2019Allow1100NoNo
15948023CARRIER AND INTEGRATED MEMORYApril 2018August 2019Allow1610NoNo
15916690SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICEMarch 2018June 2019Allow1500NoNo
15744400OPTOELECTRONIC COMPONENT COMPRISING A CONVERSION ELEMENT, METHOD OF PRODUCING AN OPTOELECTRONIC COMPONENT COMPRISING A CONVERSION ELEMENT, AND USE OF AN OPTOELECTRONIC COMPONENT COMPRISING A CONVERSION ELEMENTJanuary 2018January 2019Allow1210NoNo
15855383SIMPLIFIED BLOCK PATTERNING WITH WET STRIPPABLE HARDMASK FOR HIGH-ENERGY IMPLANTATIONDecember 2017March 2019Allow1410YesNo
15855520METHOD FOR MEASURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEDecember 2017September 2019Allow2111NoNo
15823680SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICENovember 2017April 2018Allow400NoNo
15349460SELECTIVE COBALT REMOVAL FOR BOTTOM UP GAPFILLNovember 2016June 2018Allow1910NoNo
15349306METHOD OF MANUFACTURING A SEMICONDUCTOR WAFER HAVING AN SOI CONFIGURATIONNovember 2016August 2017Allow1010NoNo
15308140ARRAY SUBSTRATE AND THE PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, LIQUID CRYSTAL PANELNovember 2016September 2018Allow2310NoNo
15295130STRUCTURE AND METHOD TO MINIMIZE JUNCTION CAPACITANCE IN NANO SHEETSOctober 2016January 2017Allow300YesNo
15128202THIN FILM TRANSISTOR AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMESeptember 2016February 2019Allow2810NoNo
15160118INDIUM PHOSPHIDE SMOOTHING AND CHEMICAL MECHANICAL PLANARIZATION PROCESSESMay 2016October 2017Allow1711NoNo
15158827METHODS EMPLOYING SACRIFICIAL BARRIER LAYER FOR PROTECTION OF VIAS DURING TRENCH FORMATIONMay 2016August 2017Allow1520YesNo
15159218REPAIRING METHOD, REPAIRING DEVICE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD OF ARRAY SUBSTRATEMay 2016September 2017Allow1620NoNo
15082242METHODS, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR STI RECESS CONTROL FOR HIGHLY SCALED FINFET DEVICESMarch 2016August 2017Allow1721NoNo
15081129SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEMarch 2016March 2017Allow1210NoNo
15007970METHOD OF MAKING A DUAL STRAINED CHANNEL SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJanuary 2016November 2016Allow920NoNo
14981074METHOD OF FORMING A BIFACIAL SOLAR CELL STRUCTUREDecember 2015October 2016Allow1010NoNo
14947986ELECTRO-OPTICAL COMPONENTNovember 2015July 2016Allow810NoNo
14922704METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SEISMIC INVERSION AND RELATED SEISMIC DATA PROCESSINGOctober 2015March 2019Allow4030YesNo
14802722REDUCING DIRECT SOURCE-TO-DRAIN TUNNELING IN FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS WITH LOW EFFECTIVE MASS CHANNELSJuly 2015February 2016Allow710NoNo
14549631ESTIMATION CIRCUIT FOR SOC AND SOH OF BATTERYNovember 2014September 2017Allow3410NoNo
14550350REDUCING DIRECT SOURCE-TO-DRAIN TUNNELING IN FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTORS WITH LOW EFFECTIVE MASS CHANNELSNovember 2014February 2016Allow1521NoNo
14522742FLEX-RIGID WIRING BOARD AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING FLEX-RIGID WIRING BOARDOctober 2014June 2016Allow2011NoNo
14523083SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURES WITH FIELD EFFECT TRANSISTOR(S) HAVING LOW-RESISTANCE SOURCE/DRAIN CONTACT(S)October 2014August 2016Allow2221NoNo
14457708METHODS OF FORMING CONTACT STRUCTURES FOR SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICES AND THE RESULTING DEVICESAugust 2014January 2016Allow1711NoNo
14333544LITHOGRAPHY USING INTERFACE REACTIONJuly 2014September 2016Allow2630YesNo
14333197BULK NANO-RIBBON AND/OR NANO-POROUS STRUCTURES FOR THERMOELECTRIC DEVICES AND METHODS FOR MAKING THE SAMEJuly 2014April 2015Allow900NoNo
14353239LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE, LIGHT-EMITTING DIODE LAMP AND ILLUMINATION DEVICEApril 2014March 2017Allow3541NoNo
14256391ELECTRONIC ELEMENTS BASED ON QUASITWO-DIMENSIONAL ELECTRON/HOLE GAS AT CHARGED DOMAIN WALLS IN FERROELECTRICSApril 2014September 2015Allow1711NoNo
14352445THERMALLY-CONDUCTIVE SHEET, LED MOUNTING SUBSTRATE, AND LED MODULEApril 2014July 2015Allow1511NoNo
14133747LED MODULEDecember 2013April 2016Allow2730YesNo
14127679ELECTRO-OPTICAL COMPONENTDecember 2013August 2015Allow2011NoNo
14132852LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMEDecember 2013February 2015Allow1401NoNo
14083797INTEGRATED CIRCUITS WITH CLOSE ELECTRICAL CONTACTS AND METHODS FOR FABRICATING THE SAMENovember 2013June 2015Allow1821NoNo
14080558METHODS FOR FABRICATING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS WITH ROBUST GATE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE PROTECTIONNovember 2013July 2015Allow2020NoNo
14032206WAFER PROCESSINGSeptember 2013May 2015Allow2020NoNo
14032203WAFER PROCESSINGSeptember 2013April 2015Allow1920NoNo
14032067METHOD OF FORMING A CONDUCTIVE POLYMER MICROSTRUCTURESeptember 2013February 2015Allow1710YesNo
13959252WAFER SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR 3D PACKAGINGAugust 2013February 2015Allow1820YesNo
13958901SILICON CONTROLLED RECTIFIER FOR HIGH VOLTAGE APPLICATIONSAugust 2013April 2015Allow2120YesNo
13957022INDUCTOR FORMATION WITH SIDEWALL IMAGE TRANSFERAugust 2013June 2014Allow1000NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner TURNER, BRIAN.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
10.8%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
1
Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(100.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
6.0%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner TURNER, BRIAN - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner TURNER, BRIAN works in Art Unit 2818 and has examined 51 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 18 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner TURNER, BRIAN's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 97% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by TURNER, BRIAN receive 2.10 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 52% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by TURNER, BRIAN is 18 months. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by TURNER, BRIAN. This interview benefit is in the 16% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 26.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 46% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 19.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 50.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 24% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.