USPTO Examiner CORNELY JOHN PATRICK - Art Unit 2812

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18441658METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH SUBMOUNT INCLUDING GROOVE ON SURFACE OF SUBMOUNT HAVING HEAT DISSIPATION PORTIONFebruary 2024January 2025Allow1110NoNo
18121730Illumination apparatus comprising passive optical nanostructuresMarch 2023May 2025Allow2630NoNo
18041087PROCESSING TASK START METHOD AND DEVICE IN SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING APPARATUSFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2800NoNo
17775392ARRAY PANEL, AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING TOUCH SIGNAL LINE, COMMON ELECTRODE AND PIXEL ELECTRODE SEQUENTLIALLY STACKED AND OVERLAPPING SUB-PIXEL OPENING AREA.May 2022March 2025Allow3510NoNo
17727487Memory Arrays Comprising Strings Of Memory Cells And Methods Used In Forming A Memory Array Comprising Strings Of Memory CellsApril 2022February 2025Allow3401NoNo
17699430SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHODMarch 2022June 2025Allow3911NoNo
17687854THIN FILM TRANSISTOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD FOR THE SAMEMarch 2022April 2025Abandon3711NoNo
17681912Display Device WITH LED DISPOSED ON SUBSTRATE INCLUDING TRANSLUSENT BODY AND CONDUCTIVE WIRE LAYERFebruary 2022June 2025Abandon3920NoNo
17584391ELECTRONIC DEVICE WITH IMPROVED STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY INCLUDING ELECTRONIC COMPONENT AND DRIVING STRUCTURE COUPLED VIA CONDUCTOR LAYERJanuary 2022November 2024Abandon3440NoNo
17295062METAL GATE STRUCTURE AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFJanuary 2022April 2025Abandon4620NoNo
17574652Method for Manufacturing Contact Hole, Semiconductor Structure and Electronic EquipmentJanuary 2022August 2024Allow3100NoNo
17564740FULL-COLOR LED DISPLAY USING ULTRA-THIN LED ELEMENT AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THEREOFDecember 2021November 2024Allow3411NoNo
17645513INFRARED DEVICE COMPRISING MESA PORTION INCLUDING THREE LATERAL SURFACES FORMING SPECIFICED ANGLES WITH SUBSTRATE FACEDecember 2021December 2024Allow3621YesNo
17551182LED MODULE AND DISPLAY DEVICE HAVING LED MODULEDecember 2021November 2024Abandon3510NoNo
17515954INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DEVICE HAVING PARALLEL CONDUCTIVE LINES WITH BULGING END PORTION(S) AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMENovember 2021February 2024Allow2721YesNo
17486775DISPLAY WITH OVERLAPPING SIGNAL LINES ON DIFFERENT LAYERS AND SHIELDING LAYER THEREBETWEENSeptember 2021September 2024Allow3610NoNo
17598232DISPLAY ASSEMBLY AND DISPLAY DEVICE EACH INCLUDING FLEXIBLE CIRCUIT BOARD WITH REINFORCEMENT PLATE HAVING WAVE SHAPED EDGESeptember 2021September 2024Allow3610NoNo
17476772MANUFACTURING METHOD OF SEMICONDUCTOR STRUCTURE INCLUDING COMPLEMENTARY FIRST AND SECOND MASK PATTERNSSeptember 2021September 2024Allow3610NoNo
17472577METAL INTERCONNECT STRUCTURE HAVING SERPENT METAL LINESeptember 2021March 2025Allow4260YesNo
17438395DISPLAY APPARATUS HAVING FLEXIBLE PANEL AND SHIELDED MULTIPLEXER IN NON-DISPLAY SUB-REGION AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAMESeptember 2021May 2025Allow4430NoNo
17432908Controlled Wetting in the Manufacture of Electronic ComponentsAugust 2021January 2025Allow4130YesNo
17405606SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE WITH ACTIVE PATTERN INCLUDING A TRANSITION PATTERN AND METHOD FOR FABRICATING THE SAMEAugust 2021March 2024Allow3121YesNo
17427107Display Panel Having Touch Electrode Leads Arranged between Substrate and Dam Structure and Preparation Method therefor, and Display ApparatusJuly 2021July 2024Allow3620NoNo
17375352PELLICLE FOR EUV LITHOGRAPHY AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAMEJuly 2021September 2024Abandon3811NoNo
17368567SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICEJuly 2021January 2025Allow4321YesNo
17353719ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING A PROTECTION LAYERJune 2021June 2024Allow3621NoNo
17353262VAPOR DEPOSITION OF FILMS COMPRISING MOLYBDENUMJune 2021February 2025Allow4430YesNo
17349896FILLER CELLS FOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT DESIGNJune 2021May 2024Allow3511YesNo
17346344SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY DEVICE HAVING STACK OF POLYCRYSTALLINE SEMICONDUCTOR LAYERS WITH DIVERSE AVERAGE CRYSTAL GRAIN SIZESJune 2021March 2024Allow3321YesNo
17324964AI SYSTEM ON CHIP (SOC) FOR ROBOTICS VISION APPLICATIONSMay 2021October 2024Allow4120NoNo
17280912DISPLAY PANEL WITH TRANSISTOR DISPOSED IN REGION CORRESPONDING TO DATA LINEMarch 2021April 2025Allow4940NoNo
17204380HIGHLY INTEGRATED MEMORY AND PERIPHERAL CIRCUITS DEVICES HAVING DISH-SHAPED DUMMY MOLD STRUCTURES THEREINMarch 2021December 2024Abandon4520YesNo
17276060ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICES HAVING SENSITIZER AND FLUORESCENT EMITTERMarch 2021June 2025Allow5140YesNo
17274519SOLID-STATE IMAGING DEVICE AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSMarch 2021June 2024Allow3930NoNo
17169230SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE INCLUDING AN EXPOSED SOLDERABLE ELEMENTFebruary 2021July 2024Allow4130NoNo
17262723OLED DISPLAY PANEL WITH LIGHT EMITTING LAYER BROKEN AT UNDERCUT STRUCTURE, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOFJanuary 2021June 2025Abandon5240NoNo
17124352MICROELECTRONIC STRUCTURES INCLUDING GLASS CORESDecember 2020February 2025Allow5021YesNo
17033655SELECTIVE USE OF DIFFERENT ADVANCED INTERFACE BUS WITH ELECTRONIC CHIPSSeptember 2020March 2025Allow5431YesNo
16979677Optoelectronic Semiconductor Device and Method for Producing an Optoelectronic Semiconductor DeviceSeptember 2020January 2025Abandon5240YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner CORNELY, JOHN PATRICK - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CORNELY, JOHN PATRICK works in Art Unit 2812 and has examined 38 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 76.3%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 38 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CORNELY, JOHN PATRICK's allowance rate of 76.3% places them in the 34% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CORNELY, JOHN PATRICK receive 2.13 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 72% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CORNELY, JOHN PATRICK is 38 months. This places the examiner in the 12% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +14.9% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CORNELY, JOHN PATRICK. This interview benefit is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 28.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 3% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 21% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 28% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.