USPTO Examiner VO TED T - Art Unit 2191

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18945838COMPILATION AND EXECUTION OF CODE CHANGES WITHIN A RUNNING JAVA VIRTUAL MACHINENovember 2024March 2025Allow400NoNo
18770567Distributed Activity Control Systems For Artificial Intelligence Task Execution Direction Including Task Adjacency And Reachability AnalysisJuly 2024March 2025Allow800NoNo
18746131SYSTEM AND METHOD OF HANDLING COMPLEX EXPERIMENTS IN A DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMJune 2024June 2025Allow1210NoNo
18731704ROBOT SYSTEMS, METHODS, CONTROL MODULES, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS THAT LEVERAGE LARGE LANGUAGE MODELSJune 2024June 2025Allow1310NoNo
18583845Configuration File Generation For Fracturable Data Path In A Coarse-Grained Reconfigurable ProcessorFebruary 2024June 2025Allow1610NoNo
18392803USABILITY CLICK TRACKING WITH NAVIGABLE CLICK PATHSDecember 2023August 2024Allow810NoNo
18518533SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSITION OF STATIC SCHEMA TO DYNAMIC SCHEMANovember 2023June 2025Allow1910NoNo
18514475EXTENSIBLE COMPILATION USING COMPOSITE PROGRAMMING FOR HARDWARE PERFORMANCE ENHANCEMENTSNovember 2023April 2025Allow1710YesNo
18513440ROBOT SYSTEMS, METHODS, CONTROL MODULES, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS THAT LEVERAGE LARGE LANGUAGE MODELSNovember 2023April 2024Allow500NoNo
18458649ADAPTIVE USER INTERFACINGAugust 2023January 2025Allow1710NoNo
18238705Data Stream Model TransformationAugust 2023June 2025Allow2210YesNo
18364869IDENTIFICATION AND APPLICATION OF RELATED SOURCE CODE EDITSAugust 2023November 2024Allow1610NoNo
18361498TECHNIQUES FOR DYNAMICALLY TRANSLATING FIELDS USING A GENERATIVE LANGUAGE MODELJuly 2023May 2025Allow2200NoNo
18349828APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT INVOLVING INSTANT PROTOYPINGJuly 2023March 2025Allow2010NoNo
18342388Program Detection Method and ApparatusJune 2023April 2025Allow2110NoNo
18341275RPA DEVELOPMENT ACCELERATION USING DSL VALIDATORJune 2023June 2025Allow2400NoNo
18333517CODE GENERATION TOOL FOR CLOUD-NATIVE HIGH-PERFORMANCE COMPUTINGJune 2023May 2025Allow2320NoNo
18202840DEPLOYMENT FOR COMPLEX ORCHESTRATIONMay 2023February 2025Allow2100NoNo
18323924Intelligent and Dynamic Updates to Group Objects Based on Attribute Value ChangeMay 2023July 2024Allow1321YesNo
18322591SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED INTELLIGENT MOBILE APPLICATION TESTINGMay 2023September 2024Allow1610NoNo
18316718SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VALIDATING STRUCTURED DOCUMENTSMay 2023May 2025Allow2400NoNo
18312578SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ALLOCATING ONE OR MORE RESOURCES TO DEVELOP AN APPLICATIONMay 2023March 2025Allow2310YesNo
18305799RULE ENGINE FOR FUNCTIONAL SAFETY CERTIFICATIONApril 2023February 2025Allow2100NoNo
18032050TAMPER DETECTION FEATURE EMBEDDING DEVICE, TAMPER DETECTION FEATURE EMBEDDING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMApril 2023January 2025Allow2100NoNo
18296171METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED DISCOVERY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)/ MACHINE LEARNING (ML) ASSETS IN AN ENTERPRISEApril 2023May 2025Allow2510NoNo
18183323BIOS UPDATE SYSTEMMarch 2023April 2025Allow2510NoNo
18175488SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONCERTED UPGRADE DEPLOYMENT FOR OPEN RADIO ACCESS NETWORK (O-RAN) COMPONENTSFebruary 2023February 2025Allow2410NoNo
18167448EXTENSIBLE COMPILATION USING COMPOSITE PROGRAMMING FOR HARDWAREFebruary 2023September 2023Allow710YesNo
18163245SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2320NoNo
18163243APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT INVOLVING INSTANT PROTOTYPINGFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2410NoNo
18163260SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023June 2024Allow1610NoNo
18163271SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023October 2024Allow2120NoNo
18163268SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023April 2024Allow1510NoNo
18163262SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023November 2024Allow2120NoNo
18163264SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023April 2024Allow1410NoNo
18163258SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023November 2024Allow2220NoNo
18163248SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023November 2024Allow2120NoNo
18163222SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023January 2025Allow2320NoNo
18163267SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023May 2024Allow1610YesNo
18163263SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWAREFebruary 2023November 2024Allow2120NoNo
18158560Dynamically Updated Text ClassifierJanuary 2023March 2024Allow1410YesNo
18099214Compiler for a Fracturable Data Path in a Reconfigurable Data ProcessorJanuary 2023November 2023Allow1000NoNo
18156323SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING AN AUTOMATED TESTING PIPELINE FOR NEURAL NETWORK MODELSJanuary 2023September 2024Allow2000NoNo
18088492SYNTAX UNIT TESTING AND FINE-TUNING OF NEURAL TRANSCOMPILATION MODELSDecember 2022February 2025Allow2510NoNo
18070015PREDICTING AND/OR APPLYING SYMBOLIC TRANSFORMATION TEMPLATESNovember 2022August 2024Allow2000YesNo
18057715METHODS AND APPARATUS TO MANAGE MONITORING AGENTSNovember 2022June 2024Allow1810NoNo
18055558Hybrid-Feedback Driven Transpiler SystemNovember 2022July 2024Allow2000NoNo
18053784ELECTRONIC CONTROL DEVICENovember 2022March 2025Allow2900NoNo
18051438AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING REASONING GRAPHSOctober 2022April 2024Allow1710NoNo
18048934COMPILER, GENERATION METHOD, CHIP, AND EXECUTION METHODOctober 2022May 2025Allow3020NoNo
17968849SOFTWARE AUTOMATION DEPLOYMENT AND PERFORMANCE TRACKINGOctober 2022July 2024Abandon2120NoNo
17966508Distributed Activity Control Systems For Artificial Intelligence Task Execution Direction Including Task Adjacency And Reachability AnalysisOctober 2022April 2024Allow1820NoNo
17955317DATA PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION USING HARDWARE SERIALIZATION AND DESERIALIZATION FUNCTIONSSeptember 2022October 2024Allow2510YesNo
17955286Memory Control for Data Processing Pipeline OptimizationSeptember 2022April 2024Allow1800NoNo
17930161OPTIMIZING COMPUTER-BASED COMPILATIONSeptember 2022April 2025Allow3210YesNo
17903166INTEGRATED APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT SYSTEMS AND METHODSSeptember 2022February 2025Allow2910NoNo
17901273SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TRANSITION OF STATIC SCHEMA TO DYNAMIC SCHEMASeptember 2022August 2023Allow1200NoNo
17823879INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMAugust 2022September 2024Allow2410NoNo
17823199GENERATION DEVICE, METHOD OF GENERATION, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTAugust 2022January 2025Allow2820NoNo
17899401PROVIDING A PSEUDO LANGUAGE FOR MANIPULATING COMPLEX VARIABLES OF AN ORCHESTRATION FLOWAugust 2022January 2024Allow1710NoNo
17898815INTELLIGENT GENERATION OF CODE FOR IMPUTATION OF MISSING DATA IN A MACHINE LEARNING DATASETAugust 2022February 2024Allow1700NoNo
17885132TYPE CACHE FOR PACKAGE MANAGEMENT OF ROBOTIC PROCESS AUTOMATIONS FIELDAugust 2022April 2025Allow3200NoNo
17877899PRUNING AND PRIORITIZING EVENT DATA FOR ANALYSISJuly 2022October 2023Allow1510NoNo
17759041NETWORK SERVICE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND NETWORK SERVICE MANAGEMENT METHODJuly 2022July 2024Abandon2410NoNo
17813053SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PRODUCTION READINESS VERIFICATION AND MONITORINGJuly 2022December 2023Allow1710NoNo
17812868AUTOMATED APPLICATION TESTING SYSTEMJuly 2022May 2024Allow2220YesNo
17745692RDMA WITH VIRTUAL ADDRESS SPACEMay 2022October 2023Allow1710NoNo
17743650SHIM LAYER FOR INTERCEPTING CALLS BETWEEN AN UPPER LAYER AND A LOWER LAYER OF A CONTAINER IMAGEMay 2022February 2024Allow2110NoNo
17741913Application Deployment Method, Apparatus, and SystemMay 2022May 2023Abandon1220NoNo
17660226High-Level Vectorization and Scalarization of Java Vector API Library MethodsApril 2022July 2023Allow1500NoNo
17727558Distributed Activity Control Systems For Artificial Intelligence Task Execution Direction Including Task Adjacency And Reachability AnalysisApril 2022August 2022Allow410NoNo
17721759SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022November 2024Allow3130NoNo
17721795SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022July 2024Allow2720NoNo
17721992SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022February 2024Allow2220NoNo
17722055SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022June 2023Allow1420NoNo
17721718SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022April 2024Allow2420NoNo
17721823SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022October 2024Allow3030YesNo
17721922SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022June 2024Allow2620YesNo
17722073SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022October 2023Allow1810NoNo
17721739SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022March 2024Allow2320NoNo
17721860SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022October 2024Allow3030YesNo
17721897SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022April 2024Allow2420NoNo
17721935SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022June 2024Allow2620NoNo
17722089SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022October 2023Allow1810NoNo
17721879SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022October 2024Allow3030NoNo
17722029SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CREATING SOFTWARE FROM LIBRARY AND CUSTOM COMPONENTSApril 2022July 2024Allow2720NoNo
17708269VISUAL QUERY LANGUAGE FOR CODE REVIEW RULESMarch 2022February 2024Allow2210NoNo
17695885NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM AND COMPILATION METHODMarch 2022December 2023Allow2110NoNo
17670205CONTAINER BASED GENERATION OF INPUTS FOR GENERIC FUNCTIONSFebruary 2022January 2025Abandon3520NoNo
17585554USER-BASED CHAOS SYSTEMJanuary 2022December 2024Allow3510YesNo
17583660Application Deployment Method, Apparatus, and SystemJanuary 2022August 2022Allow610NoNo
17648306ENHANCED EXCEPTION HANDLING FOR DEBUGGINGJanuary 2022February 2025Allow3730YesNo
17574450GROUPING SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS BASED ON TECHNICAL FACETSJanuary 2022November 2023Allow2210YesNo
17567047ON-TARGET UNIT TESTINGDecember 2021January 2024Allow2520YesNo
17564378LOW LATENCY DYNAMIC CONTENT MANAGEMENTDecember 2021August 2023Allow1920YesNo
17550529SOFTWARE AUTOMATION DEPLOYMENT AND PERFORMANCE TRACKINGDecember 2021April 2023Allow1610NoNo
17644021Indirect Function Call Target Identification in SoftwareDecember 2021November 2023Allow2310NoNo
17544104IDENTIFICATION AND APPLICATION OF RELATED SOURCE CODE EDITSDecember 2021May 2023Allow1800YesNo
17543898DETECTING BUSINESS CODE AREAS IN A MAINFRAME APPLICATIONDecember 2021October 2023Allow2220YesNo
17541016METHODS AND APPARATUS TO DETERMINE EXECUTION COSTDecember 2021April 2025Allow4110NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner VO, TED T.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
31
Examiner Affirmed
20
(64.5%)
Examiner Reversed
11
(35.5%)
Reversal Percentile
55.9%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 35.5% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
121
Allowed After Appeal Filing
50
(41.3%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
71
(58.7%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
66.2%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 41.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner VO, TED T - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner VO, TED T works in Art Unit 2191 and has examined 925 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 80.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner VO, TED T's allowance rate of 80.9% places them in the 45% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by VO, TED T receive 2.14 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 72% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by VO, TED T is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 31% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by VO, TED T. This interview benefit is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.1% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 45% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 32.7% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 71.4% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 71.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 53% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 31.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 33.3% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 26% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 2.6% of allowed cases (in the 81% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 1.6% of allowed cases (in the 62% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.