Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17130472 | Performing Configuration Validation to Optimize System Functionality | December 2020 | June 2022 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17121805 | SHAPE-BASED CODE COMPARISONS | December 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17121795 | USING FALSE POSITIVES TO DETECT INCORRECTLY UPDATED CODE SEGMENTS | December 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17121665 | Predictive Test Case Coverage | December 2020 | July 2022 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17119951 | MODEL DRIVEN SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DEVELOPMENT OF MICRO SERVICE APPLICATIONS | December 2020 | April 2022 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17119401 | DATABASE INSTANCE DEVELOPMENT, TEST, AND DEPLOYMENT ENVIRONMENT | December 2020 | July 2022 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17111260 | EFFICIENT DEFECT LOCATION IN NEW CODE VERSIONS | December 2020 | January 2022 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17102296 | System and Method for Automatic Software Application Creation | November 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17099717 | Managing Multi-Single-Tenant SaaS Services | November 2020 | September 2021 | Allow | 10 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17053627 | SYSTEM CONFIGURATION DERIVATION DEVICE AND SYSTEM CONFIGURATION DERIVATION METHOD | November 2020 | September 2022 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17032411 | Artificial Intelligence Driven Testing | September 2020 | August 2023 | Allow | 34 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17026996 | REDUCING APPLICATION STARTUP TIME BY GENERATING BYTECODE FROM METADATA AT BUILD TIME | September 2020 | December 2021 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17016918 | AUTOMATED VALIDATION AND AUTHENTICATION OF SOFTWARE MODULES | September 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17015844 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VERSIONED SCRIPT MANAGEMENT | September 2020 | June 2022 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17007619 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MONITORING CONTRIBUTORS TO SOFTWARE PLATFORM DEVELOPMENT | August 2020 | March 2022 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16933504 | DETERMINING A RECOMMENDED SOFTWARE-STACK FOR A TARGET SOFTWARE ITEM | July 2020 | November 2021 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16932302 | FIRMWARE UPDATE OF COMPONENTS OF A MODULAR NODE | July 2020 | October 2022 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 16917821 | Time-Series Analysis for Forecasting Computational Workloads | June 2020 | September 2022 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16910305 | CONTEXT-AWARE UNDO-REDO SERVICE OF AN APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM | June 2020 | April 2024 | Allow | 46 | 6 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16877180 | SHARING EXECUTION STATES AMONG STORAGE NODES DURING TESTING OF STATEFUL SOFTWARE | May 2020 | May 2023 | Allow | 36 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16871236 | IDENTIFYING SOFTWARE INTERACTION DEFECTS USING DIFFERENTIAL SPEED PROCESSORS | May 2020 | September 2021 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16871855 | Generating Tie Code Fragments for Binary Translation | May 2020 | May 2022 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16864713 | AUTOMATED SOFTWARE VERIFICATION SERVICE | May 2020 | September 2021 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16857694 | DETECTING BIAS IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SOFTWARE BY ANALYSIS OF SOURCE CODE CONTRIBUTIONS | April 2020 | February 2022 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16828703 | DYNAMICALLY UPDATING SOURCE CODE FROM A CLOUD ENVIRONMENT | March 2020 | May 2021 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16826060 | SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DECLARATIVE MODELING OF A PROCESS FOR AUTOMATION | March 2020 | November 2021 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16812333 | TEST DATA GENERATION FOR AUTOMATIC SOFTWARE TESTING | March 2020 | August 2021 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16811951 | METHOD FOR CODING ROBOT CONTROL DEVICE, PROGRAM, AND ROBOT CONTROL DEVICE | March 2020 | August 2022 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16797996 | UTILIZATION-AWARE RESOURCE SCHEDULING IN A DISTRIBUTED COMPUTING CLUSTER | February 2020 | April 2021 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16731161 | APPLICATION MANAGEMENT SERVICE INCIDENT RESOLUTION METHOD | December 2019 | November 2021 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16730626 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIGNALING THROUGH DATA STORAGE | December 2019 | October 2021 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16728075 | HEALTH DIAGNOSTICS AND ANALYTICS FOR OBJECT REPOSITORIES | December 2019 | September 2021 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 16714101 | Rapid Code Compiling System | December 2019 | January 2022 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16681207 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING EVENT ATTRIBUTION IN SOFTWARE APPLICATION | November 2019 | August 2021 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16679010 | AUTOMATED SOFTWARE PATCHING FOR VERSIONED CODE | November 2019 | January 2022 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16669254 | COMPRESSION TECHNIQUES FOR ENCODING STACK TRACE INFORMATION | October 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16575660 | INTELLIGENT CHECKING ENGINE | September 2019 | November 2020 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16541763 | CONTAINER-BASED SERVER ENVIRONMENTS | August 2019 | March 2023 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16457451 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRACKING SOURCE CODE DEPLOYMENTS | June 2019 | July 2021 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16341091 | Software Update Device, Software Update Method, and Software Update System | April 2019 | May 2022 | Allow | 38 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16339318 | ON-BOARD UPDATE SYSTEM, ON-BOARD UPDATE APPARATUS, ON-BOARD DEVICE, AND UPDATE METHOD | April 2019 | October 2021 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16373468 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING VEHICLE SOFTWARE USING OTA | April 2019 | March 2021 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16299975 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND COMMUNICATING APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS AT UNINSTALL TIME | March 2019 | April 2020 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16279490 | ELECTRONIC DEVICE, PROGRAM UPDATE METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM | February 2019 | February 2021 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16279393 | COMPUTERIZED METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR ANALYSING PERFORMANCE OF AN APPLICATION CARRYING OUT COMMUNICATION FUNCTION CALLS BETWEEN SEVERAL PROCESSES | February 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16260716 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR UPDATING APPLICATION PREDICTION MODEL, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND TERMINAL | January 2019 | October 2022 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16250818 | DEFECT RESOLUTION | January 2019 | January 2022 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16244105 | DECENTRALIZED SOFTWARE INFORMATION ESTABLISHMENT SYSTEM | January 2019 | March 2021 | Abandon | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16243916 | TRANSPARENT CLIENT-SIDE SOURCE CODE EDITING ON A REMOTE NETWORK MANAGEMENT PLATFORM | January 2019 | June 2021 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16243847 | DYNAMICALLY UPDATING SOURCE CODE FROM A CLOUD ENVIRONMENT | January 2019 | March 2020 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16316577 | METHOD FOR VALIDATING VALIDITY OF GROUP MEMBER OF VIRTUAL RESOURCE | January 2019 | April 2024 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16231902 | CAPTURING COMPONENTS OF AN APPLICATION USING A SANDBOXED ENVIRONMENT | December 2018 | June 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16199764 | WEB SERVICE MASHUP ORCHESTRATOR | November 2018 | February 2021 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16199983 | ROBOTIC REGRESSION TESTING FOR SMART DEVICES | November 2018 | August 2020 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16199724 | Processor Register Assignment for Binary Translation | November 2018 | February 2020 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16195158 | REDUCING APPLICATION STARTUP TIME BY GENERATING BYTECODE FROM METADATA AT BUILD TIME | November 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16186462 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR PROCESSING AN EXCLUDABLE ADDRESSABLE ENTITY | November 2018 | April 2020 | Abandon | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16181139 | LATENCY-AWARE HOST-AGNOSTIC RUNTIME | November 2018 | July 2020 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16162768 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING SOURCE CODE FROM BINARIES USING MACHINE LEARNING | October 2018 | June 2020 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16161710 | AUTOMATED TESTCASE BUILD ENGINE AND PREDICTION-BASED TEST SYSTEM | October 2018 | July 2020 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16160601 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR FACILITATING AN INSTANCE-SPECIFIC USER INTERFACE | October 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16154123 | INTELLIGENT HANDLING OF CONSISTENCY LEVEL OF VIRTUAL MACHINES | October 2018 | September 2021 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16153616 | SERVICE PROCESSING SYSTEM, SERVICE PROCESSING METHOD, AND SERVICE UPDATE METHOD | October 2018 | June 2021 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16137038 | Multi-Layer Test Suite Generation | September 2018 | September 2019 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 16124613 | RISK AND DEPENDENCY TRACKING AND CONTROL SYSTEM | September 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16122676 | AUTOMATED SOFTWARE VERIFICATION SERVICE | September 2018 | January 2020 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16044799 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING PERFORMANCE FAILURES IN A COMPUTER PROGRAM | July 2018 | June 2021 | Allow | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15973741 | CODE DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | May 2018 | September 2022 | Allow | 52 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15973367 | PLATFORM-INDEPENDENT USER-DEFINED FUNCTIONS FOR DATA ACCESS | May 2018 | December 2019 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15938553 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING END TO END AGILE DELIVERY IN SELF OPTIMIZED INTEGRATED PLATFORM | March 2018 | March 2020 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15938803 | TECHNIQUES FOR NATIVE RUNTIME OF HYPERTEXT MARKUP LANGUAGE GRAPHICS CONTENT | March 2018 | December 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15935607 | AUTOMATED SOFTWARE RELEASE DISTRIBUTION | March 2018 | January 2020 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15934533 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INFORMATION UPDATE SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD AND STORAGE MEDIUM | March 2018 | April 2020 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15933138 | CODE DIFFERENCE FLAW SCANNER | March 2018 | August 2020 | Abandon | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15914401 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SIGNALING THROUGH DATA STORAGE | March 2018 | November 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15914928 | USING CONTAINERS FOR UPDATE DEPLOYMENT | March 2018 | March 2021 | Allow | 36 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15888086 | ADAPTER CONFIGURATION | February 2018 | August 2019 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15887906 | MAPPING API PARAMETERS | February 2018 | May 2019 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15880352 | PREEMPTIVE LOADING OF CODE DEPENDENCIES FOR IMPROVED PERFORMANCE | January 2018 | May 2020 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15877196 | Training User-Level Differentially Private Machine-Learned Models | January 2018 | June 2022 | Allow | 53 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15863168 | TRANSLATION OF A VISUAL REPRESENTATION INTO AN EXECUTABLE INFORMATION EXTRACTION PROGRAM | January 2018 | February 2019 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15853915 | System and Method for Automatic Software Application Creation | December 2017 | July 2020 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15827325 | NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DRIVE PARTITIONS WITHIN MICROCONTROLLERS | November 2017 | July 2020 | Allow | 32 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15817545 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICTING DEFECTS IN A COMPUTER PROGRAM | November 2017 | July 2021 | Allow | 43 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15795850 | MANAGING MULTI-SINGLE-TENANT SAAS SERVICES | October 2017 | August 2020 | Allow | 33 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15796395 | METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR AN INTEGRATED PLATFORM FOR CONTINUOUS DEPLOYMENT OF SOFTWARE APPLICATION DELIVERY MODELS | October 2017 | August 2022 | Abandon | 58 | 6 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 15790154 | Prospective Voice User Interface Modality Identification | October 2017 | December 2018 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15790158 | Prospective Voice User Interface Modality Identification | October 2017 | December 2018 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15788357 | PREVIEWING APPLICATIONS BASED ON USER CONTEXT | October 2017 | September 2019 | Abandon | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15785453 | USING SEMANTIC ANNOTATIONS TO CONTROL COMPATIBILITY BEHAVIORS | October 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 28 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15784447 | INTELLIGENT CHECKING ENGINE | October 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 22 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 15784409 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CONCEALED OBJECT STORE IN A VIRTUALIZED INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM | October 2017 | March 2020 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15783061 | NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUM, SYSTEM, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | October 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15687057 | VIRTUAL PERFORMANCE MONITORING DECOUPLED FROM HARDWARE PERFORMANCE-MONITORING UNITS | August 2017 | December 2021 | Abandon | 51 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 15610326 | WINDOWS SUPPORT OF A PLUGGABLE ECOSYSTEM FOR UNIVERSAL WINDOWS APPLICATION STORES | May 2017 | January 2019 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15610473 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TEST PREDICTION IN CONTINUOUS INTEGRATION ENVIRONMENTS | May 2017 | January 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15606697 | NODE-LOCAL-UNSCHEDULER FOR SCHEDULING REMEDIATION | May 2017 | February 2021 | Allow | 45 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15604984 | ORCHESTRATING THE LIFECYCLE OF MULTIPLE-TARGET APPLICATIONS | May 2017 | July 2019 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15604647 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR GENERATING AND COMMUNICATING APPLICATION RECOMMENDATIONS AT UNINSTALL TIME | May 2017 | December 2018 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15603689 | Just In Time Deployment with Package Managers | May 2017 | August 2020 | Abandon | 38 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner UNG, LANNY N.
With a 25.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 35.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
⚠ Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner UNG, LANNY N works in Art Unit 2191 and has examined 349 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 71.1%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.
Examiner UNG, LANNY N's allowance rate of 71.1% places them in the 35% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by UNG, LANNY N receive 2.33 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 62% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by UNG, LANNY N is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +27.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by UNG, LANNY N. This interview benefit is in the 73% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 23.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 34% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 28.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 41% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 25.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 33.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 12.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 51.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.3% of allowed cases (in the 54% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 16% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.