Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18957563 | SOFTWARE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTIPLE TALP FAMILY ENHANCEMENT AND MANAGEMENT | November 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18925534 | SOFTWARE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTIPLE TALP FAMILY ENHANCEMENT AND MANAGEMENT | October 2024 | January 2025 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18784011 | Automating behaviors based on entity modeling | July 2024 | February 2025 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18749646 | UPDATING METHOD FOR PROGRAMMABLE DATA PLANE AT RUNTIME, AND APPARATUS | June 2024 | August 2024 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18636973 | SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED CODE ANALYSIS AND TAGGING | April 2024 | April 2025 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18631944 | LIFECYCLE MANAGEMENT FOR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INFRASTRUCTURE | April 2024 | May 2025 | Abandon | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18586490 | SOFTWARE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTIPLE TALP FAMILY ENHANCEMENT AND MANAGEMENT | February 2024 | August 2024 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18582248 | CODE GENERATION THROUGH REINFORCEMENT LEARNING USING CODE-QUALITY REWARDS | February 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18571884 | MICRO-FRONT-END-BASED PAGE INTERNATIONALIZATION CONFIGURATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE, AND MEDIUM | December 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18544303 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STREAMLINING MODEL RISK DOCUMENTATION PLATFORM OUTPUTS USING NATIVELY SOURCED KERNELS | December 2023 | February 2025 | Allow | 14 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18389262 | CODE INTERDEPENDENCY ANALYSIS SYSTEM | November 2023 | June 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18492173 | DYNAMIC DISTRIBUTION OF CONTAINER IMAGES | October 2023 | January 2025 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18554899 | DEEP LEARNING-BASED JAVA PROGRAM INTERNAL ANNOTATION GENERATION METHOD AND SYSTE | October 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18482772 | TEST CONFLICT GUARD FOR PARALLEL SOFTWARE TESTING | October 2023 | December 2024 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18476558 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTINUOUS TESTING AND DELIVERY OF SOFTWARE | September 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18466756 | MUTATION TESTING IN PARALLEL THREADS | September 2023 | August 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18241943 | SOFTWARE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTIPLE TALP FAMILY ENHANCEMENT AND MANAGEMENT | September 2023 | October 2023 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18336548 | RATING OF THE RELEVANCE OF TEST CASES FOR TECHNICAL SYSTEMS | June 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18324146 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO INTEGRATE ONE OR MORE SERVICES FOR AN APPLICATION | May 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18201535 | MULTI-LINGUAL CODE GENERATION WITH ZERO-SHOT INFERENCE | May 2023 | January 2024 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18312062 | PRIVACY-PRESERVING FAST APPROXIMATE K-MEANS CLUSTERING WITH HAMMING VECTORS | May 2023 | May 2024 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18305429 | AUTOMATED PRODUCT WORKFLOW USABILITY ASSESSMENT | April 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18305682 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODERNIZING LEGACY APPLICATIONS | April 2023 | November 2023 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18133190 | Framework For User-Directed Profile-Driven Optimizations | April 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 26 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18119640 | GENERATION AND/OR RECOMMENDATION OF TOOLS FOR AUTOMATING ASPECTS OF COMPUTER PROGRAMMING | March 2023 | October 2023 | Allow | 7 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18174265 | REGRESSION TESTING ON DEPLOYMENT PIPELINES | February 2023 | July 2024 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18111465 | LANGUAGE AGNOSTIC CODE CLASSIFICATION | February 2023 | January 2024 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18102638 | SOFTWARE SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTIPLE TALP FAMILY ENHANCEMENT AND MANAGEMENT | January 2023 | April 2023 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18145064 | CONTROLLER AREA NETWORK EMULATION ARCHITECTURE | December 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18063153 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM | December 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 27 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17994358 | GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE AND SYSTEM FOR DEFINING AND MAINTAINING CODE-BASED POLICIES | November 2022 | July 2023 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17978627 | MULTI-LINGUAL CODE GENERATION WITH ZERO-SHOT INFERENCE | November 2022 | February 2023 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17936499 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DATA MIGRATION | September 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17933887 | COMPATIBILITY TESTING OF WEB-BASED SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS | September 2022 | March 2025 | Allow | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17948145 | QUIESCENT OPERATION OF NON-DISRUPTIVE UPDATE OF A DATA MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | September 2022 | January 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17933238 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE OF A FIRMWARE UPDATE PROXY | September 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17932344 | MANAGING INSTALLATION AND UPDATES OF AN APPLICATION ON A COMPUTING DEVICE | September 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17931032 | ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED AUTONOMOUS CONTINUOUS TESTING PLATFORM | September 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17903991 | COMPILING MODELS FOR DEDICATED HARDWARE | September 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17902713 | REMOTE VALIDATION FOR REGULATED ENVIRONMENTS | September 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17907928 | APPLICATION PROGRAM GENERATION METHOD AND APPARATUS | August 2022 | April 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17822203 | AUTOMATED GENERATION OF RELEASE NOTE DATA OBJECTS BASED AT LEAST IN PART ON RELEASE-TIME CONFIGURATION SETTINGS | August 2022 | December 2023 | Allow | 16 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17887402 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SOFTWARE ENHANCEMENT AND MANAGEMENT | August 2022 | March 2023 | Allow | 8 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17818348 | System and method for generating failing tests from failed proofs | August 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17880408 | MANAGEMENT OF TRANSPORT SOFTWARE UPDATES | August 2022 | August 2023 | Allow | 13 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17809061 | MODERNIZING APPLICATION COMPONENTS TO REDUCE ENERGY CONSUMPTION | June 2022 | May 2025 | Allow | 35 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17842725 | CODE INSERTION COMPLETION | June 2022 | August 2024 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17839061 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEPENDENCY ANALYSIS | June 2022 | June 2023 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17833518 | SOURCE CODE CORRECTION ASSISTANCE APPARATUS AND SOURCE CODE CORRECTION ASSISTANCE METHOD | June 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17720797 | Computer Implementation Method for Software Architecture Analysis and Software Architecture Analysis Apparatus | April 2022 | September 2024 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17717609 | TRANSLATING BETWEEN PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES INDEPENDENTLY OF SEQUENCE-TO-SEQUENCE DECODERS | April 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17697119 | Framework For User-Directed Profile-Driven Optimizations | March 2022 | January 2023 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17653155 | PERSONALIZED PATCH NOTES BASED ON SOFTWARE USAGE | March 2022 | September 2023 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17679560 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR AUTO CREATION OF SOFTWARE COMPONENT REFERENCE GUIDE FROM MULTIPLE INFORMATION SOURCES | February 2022 | March 2024 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17677801 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ASSESSING FUNCTIONAL VALIDATION OF SOFTWARE COMPONENTS COMPARING SOURCE CODE AND FEATURE DOCUMENTATION | February 2022 | July 2023 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17651848 | USER SUPPORT CONTENT GENERATION | February 2022 | May 2023 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17651005 | SYSTEMS AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATED CODE ANALYSIS AND TAGGING | February 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17666435 | CENTRALIZED INTAKE AND CAPACITY ASSESSMENT PLATFORM FOR PROJECT PROCESSES, SUCH AS WITH PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN TELECOMMUNICATIONS | February 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17631743 | SOFTWARE ANALYZING DEVICE, SOFTWARE ANALYZING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM | January 2022 | December 2023 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17568585 | SEARCH BASED APPROACH FOR GENERATING CONTROLLER MODELS | January 2022 | January 2024 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17554271 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INDUSTRIAL AUTOMATION PROJECT CODE ANALYSIS | December 2021 | June 2023 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17555263 | CODE GENERATION THROUGH REINFORCEMENT LEARNING USING CODE-QUALITY REWARDS | December 2021 | November 2023 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17643665 | STATIC BLOCK FREQUENCY PREDICTION IN IRREDUCIBLE LOOPS WITHIN COMPUTER CODE | December 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17456426 | FIXED POINT EARLY EXIT OF A LOOP WITHIN COMPUTER CODE | November 2021 | January 2024 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17456433 | TRANSFORMATION OF A LOOP WITHIN COMPUTER CODE TO MINIMIZE ITERATIONS | November 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17533764 | INTEGRATED SINGLE FPGA AND SOLID STATE DISK CONTROLLER | November 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 40 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17456002 | SYNTHESIS FLOW FOR DATA PROCESSING ENGINE ARRAY APPLICATIONS RELYING ON HARDWARE LIBRARY PACKAGES | November 2021 | August 2023 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17529551 | EXTENSION PROPERTY CALLS | November 2021 | January 2024 | Allow | 26 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17511055 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IDENTIFYING AND REMOVING DEAD CODES FROM A COMPUTER PROGRAM | October 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17505722 | CODE INTERDEPENDENCY ANALYSIS SYSTEM | October 2021 | October 2023 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17503815 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING AN INTELLIGENT EPHEMERAL DISTRIBUTED SERVICE MODEL FOR SERVER GROUP PROVISIONING | October 2021 | November 2022 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17451138 | GENERATING TARGET APPLICATION PACKAGES FOR GROUPS OF COMPUTING DEVICES | October 2021 | August 2023 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17496224 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODERNIZING LEGACY APPLICATIONS | October 2021 | January 2023 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17489280 | TRANSLATING CLUSTERS OF A MONOLITH APPLICATION TO MICROSERVICES | September 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17486682 | MUTATION TESTING IN PARALLEL THREADS | September 2021 | June 2023 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17482841 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED TESTING OF WEB SERVICE APIs | September 2021 | August 2023 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17476297 | SYSTEM AND COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR TESTING AN APPLICATION USING AN AUTOMATION BOT | September 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17467690 | CONSTRAINTS-BASED REFACTORING OF MONOLITH APPLICATIONS THROUGH ATTRIBUTED GRAPH EMBEDDINGS | September 2021 | August 2023 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17410032 | DYNAMIC COMPUTATION OFFLOADING TO GRAPHICS PROCESSING UNIT | August 2021 | November 2023 | Allow | 27 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17429961 | SEQUENCE DIAGRAM GENERATION APPARATUS | August 2021 | September 2023 | Abandon | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17395213 | MULTI-LANGUAGE SOURCE CODE SEARCH ENGINE | August 2021 | September 2023 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17387072 | DIGITAL TWIN FUNCTIONAL AND NON-FUNCTIONAL SIMULATION TESTING | July 2021 | February 2024 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17384252 | SECURE APPLICATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS AND METHODS | July 2021 | April 2024 | Allow | 32 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17375977 | SYSTEM FOR CO-ORDINATION OF LOGICAL SEQUENCE OF INSTRUCTIONS ACROSS ELECTRONIC DEVICES USING VISUAL PROGRAMMING AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION | July 2021 | May 2024 | Abandon | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17373454 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATION GENERATION AND DELIVERY | July 2021 | May 2023 | Abandon | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17371144 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTINUOUS TESTING AND DELIVERY OF SOFTWARE | July 2021 | June 2023 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17359053 | TEST CYCLE OPTIMIZATION USING CONTEXTUAL ASSOCIATION MAPPING | June 2021 | August 2022 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17355737 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR FUNCTIONAL UNIT BALANCING AT PROGRAM COMPILE TIME | June 2021 | April 2023 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17356359 | METHOD FOR EXECUTING SMART CONTRACT, BLOCKCHAIN NODE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | June 2021 | December 2021 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17351305 | AUTOMATIC SMART CONTRACT ANALYSIS | June 2021 | September 2022 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17304223 | POINTER ALIGNMENT COMPUTATION IN PROGRAM CODE ACCORDING TO CODE PATTERN ANALYSES | June 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17346420 | IDENTIFY, SUGGEST, AND AUTO-IMPLEMENT BEST PRACTICES FOR REQUIREMENT SPECIFIC SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT | June 2021 | February 2023 | Allow | 20 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17343484 | Systems and Methods for Performing Binary Translation | June 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 17342572 | System and Method for Continuous Development and Continuous Integration for Identified Defects and Fixes of Computing Products | June 2021 | March 2023 | Allow | 21 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17342906 | SOFTWARE UPDATE APPARATUS, MASTER, OTA MASTER, AND NETWORK SYSTEM | June 2021 | May 2025 | Allow | 47 | 8 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17338188 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR HOT METHOD CALL GRAPH ANALYSIS | June 2021 | July 2022 | Allow | 14 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17333989 | TEST CONFLICT GUARD FOR PARALLEL SOFTWARE TESTING | May 2021 | July 2023 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17334620 | SIMULATING SERVICE PERFORMANCE USING MACHINE LEARNING | May 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17332128 | UPGRADE IMPLEMENTATION OF A VIRTUALIZATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | May 2021 | April 2022 | Allow | 11 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17317340 | MEASURING DOCUMENTATION COMPLETENESS IN MULTIPLE LANGUAGES | May 2021 | January 2023 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SOLTANZADEH, AMIR.
With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner SOLTANZADEH, AMIR works in Art Unit 2191 and has examined 319 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 90.3%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.
Examiner SOLTANZADEH, AMIR's allowance rate of 90.3% places them in the 71% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by SOLTANZADEH, AMIR receive 2.38 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 81% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SOLTANZADEH, AMIR is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 70% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +4.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SOLTANZADEH, AMIR. This interview benefit is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 27.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 20.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 77.8% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 68.8% of appeals filed. This is in the 49% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 31.8% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 16.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 13% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.