USPTO Examiner SNYDER STEVEN G - Art Unit 2184

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19096084METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DYNAMICALLY OPTIMIZING AND MODIFYING ALLOCATION OF VIRTUAL GRAPHICAL PROCESSING UNITSMarch 2025December 2025Allow910NoNo
19083809METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ENHANCING A CONTEXT FOR USE IN PROCESSING, BY A PLURALITY OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENTS, A REQUESTMarch 2025July 2025Allow410NoNo
19083971METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR RANKING A PLURALITY OF WORKER AGENTS BASED ON A USER REQUESTMarch 2025June 2025Allow310YesNo
18938353MULTI-CAST SNOOP VECTORS WITHIN A MESH TOPOLOGYNovember 2024February 2026Allow1500NoNo
18902735INTER-APPLICATION COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND PROGRAM PRODUCTSeptember 2024November 2025Allow1400YesNo
18882284METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IDENTIFICATION AND SEMANTIC CLUSTERING OF WORKER AGENTS FOR PROCESSING REQUESTSSeptember 2024December 2024Allow300NoNo
18789121MEMORY INTERFACEJuly 2024December 2025Allow1610NoNo
18783056RETIMER PATH CONTROL METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEMJuly 2024January 2026Allow1710NoNo
18769663MULTI-MODE USB-C CONNECTION CABLEJuly 2024February 2026Abandon1910NoNo
18724375BUS-BASED TRANSACTION PROCESSING METHOD AND SYSTEM, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND DEVICEJune 2024December 2025Allow1800NoNo
18753679SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM FOR UPDATING SETTING DATA OF MULTIPLE CHANNELSJune 2024October 2025Allow1610NoNo
18744582SCALABLE DATA STRUCTURE FOR AGGREGATING BMC INPUT AND OUTPUT OVER SERDES FOR DATA CENTER AND SERVER NODES SYSTEM AND METHODJune 2024November 2025Allow1710YesNo
18713160METHOD FOR EXECUTION OF BUS CONTROLLER, COMPUTER DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUMMay 2024February 2026Allow2010NoNo
18664035NEURAL NETWORKS FOR EMBEDDED DEVICESMay 2024February 2025Allow910NoNo
18654035PIPELINE ARBITRATIONMay 2024January 2026Allow2030NoNo
18650612NEURAL NETWORK DATA COMPUTATION USING MIXED-PRECISIONApril 2024February 2025Allow910NoNo
18643178MULTI-THREADING PROCESSOR AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFApril 2024July 2024Allow200NoNo
18628403Processor Operand Management Using Fusion BufferApril 2024February 2025Allow1100NoNo
18627907INSTRUCTIONS TO CONVERT FROM FP16 TO BF8April 2024March 2025Allow1210NoNo
18626753MANYCORE SYSTEM FOR PERFORMING EXECUTION OF MULTI-THREADS IN ASYNCHRONOUS MANNERApril 2024September 2024Allow510NoNo
18620228APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE TO ACCELERATE MATRIX OPERATIONSMarch 2024December 2024Allow800NoNo
18609622CONDITIONAL EXECUTION SPECIFICATION OF INSTRUCTIONS USING CONDITIONAL EXTENSION SLOTS IN THE SAME EXECUTE PACKET IN A VLIW PROCESSORMarch 2024April 2025Allow1310YesNo
18587289Decoupling Atomicity from Operation SizeFebruary 2024September 2025Allow1910YesNo
18435752PORTABLE MEMORY DEVICE HAVING MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE NON-VOLATILE ELECTRONIC DATA STORAGEFebruary 2024February 2025Abandon1310NoNo
18425239RETURN ADDRESS RESTORATIONJanuary 2024January 2026Allow2410NoNo
18425165WRITE STREAMING WITH CACHE WRITE ACKNOWLEDGMENT IN A PROCESSORJanuary 2024September 2025Allow1930YesNo
18423049Systems and Methods for Monitoring an Instruction BusJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1400NoNo
18420699GRAY CODE COUNTER ENABLED TO INCREMENT BY GREATER THAN ONEJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2010YesNo
18419059APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS TO PRECISELY MONITOR MEMORY STORE ACCESSESJanuary 2024December 2024Allow1110NoNo
18406807SCHEDULING TASKS USING WORK FULLNESS COUNTERJanuary 2024February 2026Allow2510NoNo
18534203Processor having Switch Instruction CircuitDecember 2023October 2025Allow2220NoNo
18520375SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HANDLING MACRO COMPATIBILITY FOR DOCUMENTS AT A STORAGE SYSTEMNovember 2023January 2025Allow1410YesNo
18518972FLOATING POINT ADDERNovember 2023February 2025Allow1410NoNo
18515062APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE TO ACCELERATE MATRIX OPERATIONSNovember 2023July 2025Allow2000NoNo
18513610METHOD FOR SUPPORTING ERASURE CODE DATA PROTECTION WITH EMBEDDED PCIE SWITCH INSIDE FPGA+SSDNovember 2023August 2025Allow2130YesNo
18383833CONFIGURABLE LOGIC PLATFORMOctober 2023September 2024Allow1110NoNo
18492968INTELLIGENT SCHEDULING APPARATUS AND METHODOctober 2023October 2024Allow1210NoNo
18491455PROCESSING UNIT EMPLOYING MICRO-OPERATIONS (MICRO-OPS) RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY (RAM) AS MAIN PROGRAM MEMORYOctober 2023March 2025Allow1700NoNo
18490628PROVIDING ADDITIONAL OPERATIONS FOR A FUNCTIONAL UNIT OF A PROCESSOR COREOctober 2023January 2026Allow2720YesNo
18483064SYSTEM AND METHOD OF DIGITAL TO ANALOG CONVERSION USING DYNAMIC ELEMENT MATCHINGOctober 2023May 2025Allow1910NoNo
18374176DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND RELATED PRODUCT FOR INCREASED EFFICIENCY OF TENSOR PROCESSINGSeptember 2023July 2025Allow2120NoNo
18473414TRACKING INSTRUCTION HANDLING USING OPCODE MATCHING IN PROCESSOR-BASED DEVICESSeptember 2023April 2025Allow1910NoNo
18369819DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS, AND RELATED PRODUCT FOR INCREASED EFFICIENCY OF TENSOR PROCESSINGSeptember 2023August 2024Allow1110NoNo
18230316Discrete Three-Dimensional ProcessorAugust 2023January 2026Allow3010NoNo
18356409SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR POLICY EXECUTION PROCESSINGJuly 2023July 2024Allow1210NoNo
18356103SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ROUTING MULTIMEDIA SIGNALSJuly 2023August 2025Allow2510YesNo
18218562PEER-TO-PEER ROUTE THROUGH IN A RECONFIGURABLE COMPUTING SYSTEMJuly 2023December 2024Allow1700NoNo
18342490POWER TAKEOFF-DRIVEN REFRIGERATIONJune 2023April 2025Allow2110NoNo
18339024BRANCH PREDICTION METHOD, BRANCH PREDICTION APPARATUS, PROCESSOR, MEDIUM, AND DEVICEJune 2023February 2025Allow1910YesNo
18337261COMPUTER-CONTROLLED POWER TAKEOFF DRIVEN MOTORIZED PUMP SYSTEMJune 2023October 2025Allow2710NoNo
18321013Network Device with Programmable Action ProcessingMay 2023December 2024Allow1910NoNo
18036597METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CLEARING REGISTER BY PLD, DEVICE, AND MEDIUMMay 2023November 2023Allow610NoNo
18187888VEHICLE COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, VEHICLE COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND CONTROL DEVICEMarch 2023June 2025Allow2730NoNo
18121294Programmable Multi-Level Data Access Address GeneratorMarch 2023April 2024Allow1300NoNo
18117472Discrete Three-Dimensional ProcessorMarch 2023November 2025Allow3340NoNo
18042845IN-CORE PARALLELISATION IN A DATA PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHODFebruary 2023October 2024Allow2010NoNo
18114044NEURAL NETWORK DATA COMPUTATION USING MIXED-PRECISIONFebruary 2023March 2024Allow1320NoNo
18168639SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING SETTINGS BASED UPON INFORMATION HANDLING SYSTEM (IHS) POSTURE AND ORIENTATION USING HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING PLATFORMSFebruary 2023September 2025Allow3130YesNo
18107139COMPRESSION OF ENTRIES IN A REORDER BUFFERFebruary 2023August 2024Allow1800NoNo
18160600APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS TO PRECISELY MONITOR MEMORY STORE ACCESSESJanuary 2023October 2023Allow910YesNo
18018227HARDWARE ACCELERATORJanuary 2023September 2024Allow1910NoNo
18100194SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR TILE LOAD, MULTIPLICATION AND ACCUMULATIONJanuary 2023August 2024Allow1920NoNo
18098723Memory sharing electronic circuit system and external device capable of storing data in host deviceJanuary 2023March 2025Allow2620YesNo
18156628NEURAL NETWORKS FOR EMBEDDED DEVICESJanuary 2023December 2023Allow1110NoNo
18097615STREAMING EXECUTION FOR A QUANTUM PROCESSING SYSTEMJanuary 2023July 2023Allow600NoNo
18096013DISCRETE THREE-DIMENSIONAL PROCESSORJanuary 2023January 2024Allow1200NoNo
18152156INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHODJanuary 2023September 2024Abandon2010NoNo
18093643BRANCH TARGET BUFFER MISS HANDLINGJanuary 2023August 2024Allow1910NoNo
18150074SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR HANDLING MACRO COMPATIBILITY FOR DOCUMENTS AT A STORAGE SYSTEMJanuary 2023July 2023Allow600NoNo
18092533SERIALIZING EXECUTION OF REPLICATION OPERATIONSJanuary 2023December 2023Abandon1210YesNo
18090818ADDITION MASK VALUE GENERATOR, ENCRYPTOR AND METHOD FOR GENERATING STREAM KEYDecember 2022January 2025Allow2400NoNo
18089747CARRY-LOOKAHEAD ADDER, SECURE ADDER AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING CARRY-LOOKAHEAD ADDITIONDecember 2022June 2024Allow1800NoNo
18146048SYSTOLIC NEURAL CPU PROCESSORDecember 2022October 2024Allow2200NoNo
18145801ACCELERATING EIGHT-WAY PARALLEL KECCAK EXECUTIONDecember 2022September 2024Allow2010NoNo
18067016SEQUENCE PARTITION BASED SCHEDULE OPTIMIZATIONDecember 2022May 2024Allow1700NoNo
18079632CONTROL SYSTEM AND CONTROL METHOD FOR REMOTELY INSTALLED CONTROLLER DEVICESDecember 2022November 2024Allow2320NoNo
18076676STORAGE SYSTEMDecember 2022September 2024Allow2200NoNo
18061951BRANCH TARGET BUFFER WITH SHARED TARGET BITSDecember 2022May 2024Allow1710NoNo
17994374Discrete Three-Dimensional ProcessorNovember 2022June 2023Allow700NoNo
17989926Floating Point AdderNovember 2022July 2023Allow700NoNo
17986731COMMUNICATION METHOD, RELATED COMPUTING SYSTEM AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR SELECTING A COMMUNICATION CHANNEL BETWEEN MODULESNovember 2022July 2024Allow2020YesNo
18054280Arbitration Sub-Queues for a Memory CircuitNovember 2022April 2024Allow1710YesNo
17984351RECONFIGURABLE PARALLEL PROCESSOR WITH STACKED COLUMNS FORMING A CIRCULAR DATA PATHNovember 2022January 2024Allow1400NoNo
17981340METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR RENAMING INSTRUCTIONS RELATED TO FIXED CONSTANTSNovember 2022October 2023Abandon1110NoNo
17981339METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING REMAINDER INSTRUCTION OF RISC-V INSTRUCTION SETNovember 2022September 2023Abandon1010NoNo
17975638Discrete Three-Dimensional ProcessorOctober 2022March 2023Allow500NoNo
17971638Discrete Three-Dimensional ProcessorOctober 2022March 2025Allow2910NoNo
17964898Discrete Three-Dimensional ProcessorOctober 2022February 2023Allow400NoNo
17964888Discrete Three-Dimensional ProcessorOctober 2022March 2023Allow510NoNo
17961888SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING MULTIPLE PLATFORM-DEPENDENT INSTRUCTION SETS FROM SINGLE HARDWARE SPECIFICATIONOctober 2022November 2024Allow2520NoNo
17958445CURRENT VARIATION SLOPE CONTROL METHOD FOR MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR, CONTROL DEVICE AND MEDIUMOctober 2022January 2024Allow1610NoNo
17958725PIPELINE ARBITRATIONOctober 2022January 2024Allow1600NoNo
17952144CONFIGURABLE LOGIC PLATFORMSeptember 2022August 2023Allow1110YesNo
17887245Chipset Attached Random Access MemoryAugust 2022April 2025Allow3240YesNo
17819605EMBEDDED COMPUTATION INSTRUCTION PERFORMANCE PROFILINGAugust 2022May 2023Allow1010YesNo
17884244MODULAR ACCELERATOR FUNCTION UNIT (AFU) DESIGN, DISCOVERY, AND REUSEAugust 2022June 2024Allow2240NoNo
17870926CONDITIONAL EXECUTION SPECIFICATION OF INSTRUCTIONS USING CONDITIONAL EXTENSION SLOTS IN THE SAME EXECUTE PACKET IN A VLIW PROCESSORJuly 2022December 2023Allow1720NoNo
17870651TECHNIQUES FOR REDUCING CPU PRIVILEGE BOUNDARY CROSSINGSJuly 2022December 2023Allow1610YesNo
17867134SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PREDICATION HANDLINGJuly 2022June 2025Allow3520NoYes
17862708APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS TO PRECISELY MONITOR MEMORY STORE ACCESSESJuly 2022July 2023Abandon1210NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SNYDER, STEVEN G.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
27
Examiner Affirmed
22
(81.5%)
Examiner Reversed
5
(18.5%)
Reversal Percentile
30.2%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 18.5% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
61
Allowed After Appeal Filing
15
(24.6%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
46
(75.4%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
33.4%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 24.6% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner SNYDER, STEVEN G - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SNYDER, STEVEN G works in Art Unit 2184 and has examined 852 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 79.8%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SNYDER, STEVEN G's allowance rate of 79.8% places them in the 49% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SNYDER, STEVEN G receive 1.97 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 49% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SNYDER, STEVEN G is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 59% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -6.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SNYDER, STEVEN G. This interview benefit is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 63% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 40.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 53.3% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 59.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 33% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 48.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 41.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show below-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 5.4% of allowed cases (in the 87% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.6% of allowed cases (in the 72% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.