USPTO Examiner VICARY KEITH E - Art Unit 2183

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18745756PREDICTION CIRCUITRY USING A PREDICTION TABLE PROVIDING A SKIP-FETCH-INSTRUCTION ENTRYJune 2024February 2026Allow2010YesNo
18739070Load Instruction FusionJune 2024October 2025Allow1610YesNo
18649817SYSTEM TO ISSUE ONE OR MORE INSTRUCTIONS TO ONE OR MORE EXECUTION UNITSApril 2024January 2026Abandon2110NoNo
18626629APPARATUSES, METHODS, AND SYSTEMS FOR INSTRUCTIONS TO REQUEST A HISTORY RESET OF A PROCESSOR COREApril 2024October 2025Allow1910YesNo
18621071Apparatus and Method for Remote Atomic Floating Point OperationsMarch 2024March 2026Allow2320YesNo
18593817ASYNCHRONOUS RELEASE OPERATIONS IN A MULTIPROCESSOR SYSTEMMarch 2024March 2026Allow2420YesNo
18532836Physical Register SharingDecember 2023August 2025Allow2010YesNo
18525217POLYMORPHIC TWO-DIMENSIONAL REGISTER FILENovember 2023December 2025Abandon2510NoNo
18220169SINGLE INSTRUCTION MULTIPLE DISPATCHES FOR SHORT KERNELS IN A RECONFIGURABLE PARALLEL PROCESSORJuly 2023December 2025Allow3020NoNo
18345007Supporting Multiple Vector Lengths with Configurable Vector Register FileJune 2023March 2026Allow3220YesNo
18216201INSTRUCTION FLOW REGULATOR FOR A PROCESSING UNITJune 2023January 2026Abandon3120YesNo
18213598HANDLING DYNAMIC TENSOR LENGTHS IN A RECONFIGURABLE PROCESSOR THAT INCLUDES MULTIPLE MEMORY UNITSJune 2023December 2025Allow3030YesNo
18328688SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING FORMATTED DATA IN COMPUTATIONAL STORAGEJune 2023October 2025Allow2940YesNo
18312365MANAGING SPECULATIVE INSTRUCTION EXECUTION USING SPECULATIVE ID IN A GRAPHFLOW APPARATUSMay 2023August 2025Allow2730YesNo
17867859METHOD OF ACCELERATING A VECTOR OPERATION USING ELEMENT -WISE COMPARISON, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMJuly 2022December 2025Abandon4150YesNo
17855816VECTOR PROCESSOR WITH VECTOR AND ELEMENT REDUCTION METHODJuly 2022November 2025Abandon4140YesNo
17720657Cache Preload Operations Using Streaming EngineApril 2022November 2025Allow4340YesYes
17676910INSERTING NULL VECTORS INTO A STREAM OF VECTORSFebruary 2022October 2025Allow4320NoYes
17623329SYSTEM AND ARCHITECTURE OF PURE FUNCTIONAL NEURAL NETWORK ACCELERATORDecember 2021September 2025Allow4540YesNo
17561029HARDWARE-SOFTWARE CO-DESIGNED MULTI-CAST FOR IN-MEMORY COMPUTING ARCHITECTURESDecember 2021August 2025Allow4411YesNo
17360949PROVIDING ATOMICITY FOR COMPLEX OPERATIONS USING NEAR-MEMORY COMPUTINGJune 2021December 2025Abandon5480YesNo
17244797PARTITIONABLE DIGITAL HARDWARE SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKSApril 2021March 2026Allow5930YesNo
17214291INSTRUCTION AND LOGIC FOR COMPUTATIONS OF SUM OF ABSOLUTE DIFFERENCES VALUES FOR MULTIPLE VECTOR LANES USING OFFSETSMarch 2021March 2026Abandon5940YesNo
17133618SPECULATIVE DECOMPRESSION WITHIN PROCESSOR CORE CACHESDecember 2020November 2025Abandon5940YesNo
16786997FACILITATING PROVISIONING IN A MIXED ENVIRONMENT OF LOCALESFebruary 2020June 2020Allow400YesNo
16533588DISTRIBUTED PHYSICAL PROCESSING OF MATRIX SUM OPERATIONAugust 2019February 2021Allow1810YesNo
16422602VECTOR STORE USING BIT-REVERSED ORDERMay 2019February 2026Abandon60120YesNo
16408445MANAGING AN ISSUE QUEUE FOR FUSED INSTRUCTIONS AND PAIRED INSTRUCTIONS IN A MICROPROCESSORMay 2019August 2020Allow1510YesNo
16384819SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR STREAM-DATAFLOW ACCELERATION WHEREIN A DELAY IS IMPLEMENTED SO AS TO EQUALIZE ARRIVAL TIMES OF DATA PACKETS AT A DESTINATION FUNCTIONAL UNITApril 2019April 2021Allow2440YesNo
15843982PRIORITIZED INSTRUCTIONS IN AN INSTRUCTION COMPLETION TABLE OF A SIMULTANEOUS MULTITHREADING PROCESSORDecember 2017March 2021Allow3950YesNo
15816363PROVIDING A PREDICTED TARGET ADDRESS TO MULTIPLE LOCATIONS BASED ON DETECTING AN AFFILIATED RELATIONSHIPNovember 2017August 2020Allow3340YesNo
15795772MANAGING AN ISSUE QUEUE FOR FUSED INSTRUCTIONS AND PAIRED INSTRUCTIONS IN A MICROPROCESSOROctober 2017April 2019Allow1830NoNo
15680759PROVIDING A PREDICTED TARGET ADDRESS TO MULTIPLE LOCATIONS BASED ON DETECTING AN AFFILIATED RELATIONSHIPAugust 2017September 2020Allow3640YesNo
15662454Processor for Correlation-Based Infinite Loop DetectionJuly 2017December 2019Allow2820NoNo
15355747EFFICIENT SCHEDULING FOR HYPER-THREADED CPUS USING MEMORY MONITORINGNovember 2016February 2021Allow5190YesNo
15270275SPLIT-LEVEL HISTORY BUFFER IN A COMPUTER PROCESSING UNITSeptember 2016November 2017Allow1420YesNo
15267650SPLIT-LEVEL HISTORY BUFFER IN A COMPUTER PROCESSING UNITSeptember 2016May 2017Allow800YesNo
15091788SPLIT-LEVEL HISTORY BUFFER IN A COMPUTER PROCESSING UNITApril 2016August 2016Allow410YesNo
15011319FACILITATING PROVISIONING IN A MIXED ENVIRONMENT OF LOCALESJanuary 2016November 2019Allow4530YesNo
14930848ENABLING REMOVAL AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FLAG OPERATIONS IN A PROCESSORNovember 2015February 2021Allow6050NoYes
14869641SYSTEM LEVEL TESTING OF MULTI-THREADING FUNCTIONALITY INCLUDING BUILDING INDEPENDENT INSTRUCTION STREAMS WHILE HONORING ARCHITECTURALLY IMPOSED COMMON FIELDS AND CONSTRAINTSSeptember 2015March 2020Allow5360YesNo
14752891Systems, Methods, and Apparatuses for Last Branch Record Support Compatible with Binary Translation and Speculative Execution using an Architectural Bit Array and a Write Bit ArrayJune 2015February 2021Allow6040NoNo
14618693SYSTEM LEVEL TESTING OF MULTI-THREADING FUNCTIONALITY INCLUDING BUILDING INDEPENDENT INSTRUCTION STREAMS WHILE HONORING ARCHITECTURALLY IMPOSED COMMON FIELDS AND CONSTRAINTSFebruary 2015March 2020Allow6060YesNo
14301936PREDICTING INDIRECT BRANCHES USING PROBLEM BRANCH FILTERING AND PATTERN CACHEJune 2014May 2020Allow6080YesNo
14288020FACILITATING PROVISIONING IN A MIXED ENVIRONMENT OF LOCALESMay 2014December 2015Allow1930YesNo
14063409APPARATUS FOR GATING A LOAD OPERATION BASED ON ENTRIES OF A PREDICTION TABLEOctober 2013August 2018Allow5840YesNo
14042681INSTRUCTION AND LOGIC FOR PERFORMING A DOT-PRODUCT OPERATIONSeptember 2013March 2015Abandon1730YesYes
13956347PROVIDING VECTOR SUB-BYTE DECOMPRESSION FUNCTIONALITYJuly 2013April 2016Allow3210YesNo
13993321SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR GENERATING A LOOP ALIGNMENT COUNT OR A LOOP ALIGNMENT MASKJune 2013May 2018Allow5940YesNo
13844111METHODS, APPARATUS, AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR CONVERTING VECTOR DATAMarch 2013June 2016Allow3940YesNo
13799393Apparatus, System and Method For Configuration of Adaptive Integrated Circuitry Having Fixed, Application Specific Computational ElementsMarch 2013December 2016Allow4520YesNo
13792039METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR CREATING AND EXECUTING A PACKET OF INSTRUCTIONS ORGANIZED ACCORDING TO DATA DEPENDENCIES BETWEEN ADJACENT INSTRUCTIONS AND UTILIZING NETWORKS BASED ON ADJACENCIES TO TRANSPORT DATA IN RESPONSE TO EXECUTION OF THE INSTRUCTIONSMarch 2013May 2016Allow3920YesNo
13749504SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC STORAGE LOAD BALANCING IN VIRTUAL SERVER ENVIRONMENTSJanuary 2013July 2013Allow610YesNo
13717480RUNNING SHIFT FOR DIVIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCESSING VECTORSDecember 2012February 2016Allow3820YesNo
13681520FINE-GRAINED INSTRUCTION ENABLEMENT AT SUB-FUNCTION GRANULARITY BASED ON AN INDICATED SUBRANGE OF REGISTERSNovember 2012March 2017Allow5260YesNo
13680369MULTIPROCESSOR COMPUTING DEVICENovember 2012May 2016Abandon4120YesYes
13670326Instructions With Floating Point Control OverrideNovember 2012February 2014Allow1520YesNo
13628781PROCESSING VECTORS USING WRAPPING NEGATION INSTRUCTIONS IN THE MACROSCALAR ARCHITECTURESeptember 2012July 2013Allow1010YesNo
13628857PROCESSING VECTORS USING WRAPPING BOOLEAN INSTRUCTIONS IN THE MACROSCALAR ARCHITECTURESeptember 2012July 2013Allow1010YesNo
13625164PROCESSING VECTORS USING WRAPPING MINIMA AND MAXIMA INSTRUCTIONS IN THE MACROSCALAR ARCHITECTURESeptember 2012July 2013Allow1010YesNo
13625097PROCESSING VECTORS USING WRAPPING SHIFT INSTRUCTIONS IN THE MACROSCALAR ARCHITECTURESeptember 2012June 2013Allow910YesNo
13625131PROCESSING VECTORS USING WRAPPING MULTIPLY AND DIVIDE INSTRUCTIONS IN THE MACROSCALAR ARCHITECTURESeptember 2012July 2013Allow910YesNo
13610299PROCESSING VECTORS USING WRAPPING ADD AND SUBTRACT INSTRUCTIONS IN THE MACROSCALAR ARCHITECTURESeptember 2012June 2013Allow910YesNo
13610851ORGANIZATION OF VIRTUAL HETEROGENEOUS ENTITIES INTO SYSTEM RESOURCE GROUPS FOR DEFINING POLICY MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK IN A MANAGED SYSTEMS ENVIRONMENTSeptember 2012April 2013Allow710YesNo
13604390OPTIMIZING PROCESSING IN A MULTI-CORE PROCESSOR COMPLEX BASED ON INSTRUCTION THROUGHPUTSeptember 2012October 2015Abandon3740YesNo
13604496PROCESSING COMPLEX HAVING A SOFTWARE CONTROLLER FOR SWITCHING OPERATIONS BETWEEN SETS OF CORESSeptember 2012August 2016Abandon4760YesNo
13557725PROCESSOR EMPLOYING SPLIT SCHEDULER IN WHICH NEAR, LOW LATENCY OPERATION DEPENDENCIES ARE TRACKED SEPARATE FROM OTHER OPERATION DEPENDENCIESJuly 2012December 2012Allow410YesNo
13484709INSTRUCTION FOR COMPARING ACTIVE VECTOR ELEMENTS TO PRECEDING ACTIVE ELEMENTS TO DETERMINE VALUE DIFFERENCESMay 2012April 2013Allow1010YesNo
13484666CONDITIONAL EXTRACT INSTRUCTION FOR PROCESSING VECTORSMay 2012December 2015Abandon4240YesNo
13479436Resource Property Aggregation in a Multi-Provider SystemMay 2012June 2013Abandon1320YesNo
13463454RUNNING MULTIPLY-ACCUMULATE INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCESSING VECTORSMay 2012March 2013Allow1010NoNo
13456371RUNNING UNARY OPERATION INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCESSING VECTORSApril 2012February 2013Allow1010YesNo
13431995Virtual Input-Output Connections for Machine VirtualizationMarch 2012July 2015Allow4040YesNo
13431382COMPONENT LOCK TRACING BY ASSOCIATING COMPONENT TYPE PARAMETERS WITH PARTICULAR LOCK INSTANCESMarch 2012December 2012Allow810YesNo
13330804INSTRUCTION SET ARCHITECTURE WITH EXTENDED REGISTER ADDRESSING USING ONE OR MORE PRIMARY OPCODE BITSDecember 2011December 2016Allow6030YesNo
13329575INSTRUCTION PREDICATION USING INSTRUCTION FILTERINGDecember 2011December 2016Allow6030YesNo
13273320FACILITATING PROCESSING IN A COMPUTING ENVIRONMENT USING AN EXTENDED DRAIN INSTRUCTIONOctober 2011November 2012Allow1310YesNo
13237646DATA EXCHANGE AND COMMUNICATION BETWEEN EXECUTION UNITS IN A PARALLEL PROCESSORSeptember 2011December 2012Allow1510YesNo
13234785FINE-GRAINED INSTRUCTION ENABLEMENT AT SUB-FUNCTION GRANULARITY BASED ON AN INDICATED SUBRANGE OF REGISTERSSeptember 2011March 2017Allow6060YesNo
13219418VECTOR SHUFFLE INSTRUCTIONS OPERATING ON MULTIPLE LANES EACH HAVING A PLURALITY OF DATA ELEMENTS USING A SAME SET OF PER-LANE CONTROL BITSAugust 2011August 2014Allow3520YesNo
13211701Local Computation Logic Embedded in a Register File to Accelerate ProgramsAugust 2011September 2019Allow6080YesYes
13189140GETFIRST AND ASSIGNLAST INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCESSING VECTORSJuly 2011October 2015Abandon5140YesNo
13188737RUNNING SUBTRACT AND RUNNING DIVIDE INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCESSING VECTORSJuly 2011January 2013Allow1810YesNo
13115012ADVANCED PROCESSOR SCHEDULING IN A MULTITHREADED SYSTEMMay 2011September 2013Abandon2820YesNo
12932542INTERCONNECTION NETWORK CONNECTING OPERATION-CONFIGURABLE NODES ACCORDING TO ONE OR MORE LEVELS OF ADJACENCY IN MULTIPLE DIMENSIONS OF COMMUNICATION IN A MULTI-PROCESSOR AND A NEURAL PROCESSORFebruary 2011January 2013Allow2210YesNo
13001852BRANCH PREDICTION USING A LEADING VALUE OF A CALL STACK STORING FUNCTION ARGUMENTSDecember 2010December 2013Allow3610YesNo
12971734CSTATE BOOST METHOD AND APPARATUSDecember 2010December 2015Abandon6030YesNo
12972361PARALLEL DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS AND METHODS USING COOPERATIVE THREAD ARRAYS WITH UNIQUE THREAD IDENTIFIERS AS AN INPUT TO COMPUTE AN IDENTIFIER OF A LOCATION IN A SHARED MEMORYDecember 2010September 2011Allow910YesNo
12970927SECURITY SANDBOXDecember 2010April 2016Abandon6040YesNo
12965673SIMD ARRAY OPERABLE TO PROCESS DIFFERENT RESPECTIVE PACKET PROTOCOLS SIMULTANEOUSLY WHILE EXECUTING A SINGLE COMMON INSTRUCTION STREAMDecember 2010October 2011Allow1110NoNo
12962207HARDWARD BREAKPOINTS IMPLEMENTED USING METADATA STORED AT MEMORY ADDRESSDecember 2010January 2016Abandon6040YesNo
12962113ODD AND EVEN START BIT VECTORSDecember 2010July 2013Allow3110YesNo
12961829PROGRAMMABLE ATOMIC MEMORY USING HARDWARE VALIDATION AGENTDecember 2010April 2015Allow5330YesNo
12958604METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR AN ENHANCED SPEED UNIFIED SCHEDULER UTILIZING OPTYPES FOR COMPACT LOGICDecember 2010February 2016Abandon6040NoNo
12957699MULTIFLOW METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATION FUSIONDecember 2010March 2016Abandon6040NoNo
12957754UNIFIED SCHEDULER FOR A PROCESSOR MULTI-PIPELINE EXECUTION UNIT AND METHODSDecember 2010January 2016Abandon6040NoNo
12927837INTERCONNECTION NETWORKS AND METHODS OF CONSTRUCTION THEREOF FOR EFFICIENTLY SHARING MEMORY AND PROCESSING IN A MULTIPROCESSOR WHEREIN CONNECTIONS ARE MADE ACCORDING TO ADJACENCY OF NODES IN A DIMENSIONNovember 2010December 2011Allow1210YesNo
12907471SELECT FIRST AND SELECT LAST INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCESSING VECTORSOctober 2010September 2015Abandon5940YesNo
12895034Measuring Runtime Coverage of Architectural Events of a MicroprocessorSeptember 2010October 2013Allow3610YesNo
12892128ARITHMETIC PROCESSING UNIT, SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT, AND ARITHMETIC PROCESSING METHODSeptember 2010September 2013Abandon3610NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner VICARY, KEITH E.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
22
Examiner Affirmed
16
(72.7%)
Examiner Reversed
6
(27.3%)
Reversal Percentile
43.1%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 27.3% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
59
Allowed After Appeal Filing
25
(42.4%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
34
(57.6%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
70.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 42.4% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner VICARY, KEITH E - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner VICARY, KEITH E works in Art Unit 2183 and has examined 396 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 54.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner VICARY, KEITH E's allowance rate of 54.3% places them in the 15% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by VICARY, KEITH E receive 3.23 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 91% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by VICARY, KEITH E is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 12% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +62.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by VICARY, KEITH E. This interview benefit is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 16.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 13% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 16.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 18% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 30.8% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 32% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 62.1% of appeals filed. This is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 25.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 65.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 14.6% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 4.7% of allowed cases (in the 79% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.