Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18925482 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING INSTRUCTIONS TO CONVERT TO 16-BIT FLOATING-POINT FORMAT | October 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 11 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18922873 | Cluster-Based Placement and Routing of Memory Units and Compute Units in a Reconfigurable Computing Grid | October 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18906205 | MIXED-SOURCED DEPENDENCY CONTROL FOR VECTOR INSTRUCTIONS | October 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18889148 | SM3 HASH ALGORITHM ACCELERATION PROCESSORS, METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND INSTRUCTIONS | September 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18830104 | WRITE BUFFER CIRCUIT SUPPORTING STORE RELEASE COMBINING OF STORE OPERATIONS FROM A MEMORY ACCESS STAGE OF A PROCESSOR INSTRUCTION PIPELINE FOR EFFICIENT PROCESSING OF STORE RELEASE INSTRUCTIONS, AND RELATED METHODS | September 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 12 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18814641 | MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD WITH PROCESSING-IN-MEMORY BLOCK | August 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18841082 | LOOPING INSTRUCTION | August 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18805711 | LOOK-UP TABLE READ | August 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18800423 | Thread Creation on Local or Remote Compute Elements by a Multi-Threaded, Self-Scheduling Processor | August 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18779980 | STREAMING ENGINE WITH CACHE-LIKE STREAM DATA STORAGE AND LIFETIME TRACKING | July 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18773632 | PROCESSOR WITH ONE OR MORE PROGRESSIVE CONSERVATIVE EXECUTION MODES | July 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18770560 | Schedule Instructions of a Program of Data Flows for Execution in Tiles of a Coarse Grained Reconfigurable Array | July 2024 | July 2025 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18769206 | PROCESSING FOR PROCESSORS PERFORMING TASKS HAVING FORWARD CONDITIONAL BRANCH INSTRUCTIONS | July 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 14 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18596106 | ROBUST, EFFICIENT MULTIPROCESSOR-COPROCESSOR INTERFACE | March 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18429142 | VECTOR REDUCTION PROCESSOR | January 2024 | August 2025 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18406527 | ENCODING AND DECODING VARIABLE LENGTH INSTRUCTIONS | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 18524222 | Vector Load Store Operations in a Vector Pipeline Using a Single Operation in a Load Store Unit | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18515206 | Register Rename for Deterministically Updated Register | November 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18510088 | REDUCTION OF DATA TRANSFER OVERHEAD | November 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18496013 | FETCHING VECTOR DATA ELEMENTS WITH PADDING | October 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 18494696 | NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE AND LOAD/STORE METHOD OF NEURAL PROCESSING DEVICE | October 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18374363 | BTB PREFECTHING VIA BACK-ANNOTATION | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18371635 | MULTI-LEVEL HIERARCHICAL ROUTING MATRICES FOR PATTERN-RECOGNITION PROCESSORS | September 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18237511 | MICROPROCESSOR WITH APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR REPLAYING LOAD INSTRUCTIONS | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18448240 | REGISTER CLEARING | August 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18358894 | Biased Indirect Control Transfer Prediction | July 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18337723 | ACCELERATOR, METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAME, AND ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME | June 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18335127 | FPGA WIDE BARREL-SHIFTERS IMPLEMENTATION USING PACKED DSP MULTIPLIERS | June 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18298723 | PRESERVING MEMORY ORDERING BETWEEN OFFLOADED INSTRUCTIONS AND NON-OFFLOADED INSTRUCTIONS | April 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18180327 | Vector Instruction Processing After Primary Decode | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18175333 | TASK SCHEDULING FOR SYSTEMS INCLUDING MULTIPLE HARDWARE ACCELERATORS | February 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17841558 | DEVICE, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXECUTING A TILE LOAD AND EXPAND INSTRUCTION | June 2022 | February 2026 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17840029 | CONCURRENTLY FETCHING INSTRUCTIONS FOR MULTIPLE DECODE CLUSTERS | June 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17745032 | MEMORY-EFFICIENT STREAMING CONVOLUTIONS IN NEURAL NETWORK PROCESSOR | May 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 40 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17560554 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR VECTOR PACKED CONCATENATE AND SHIFT OF SPECIFIC PORTIONS OF QUADWORDS | December 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17514549 | ZERO EXTENDED 52-BIT INTEGER FUSED MULTIPLY ADD AND SUBTRACT INSTRUCTIONS | October 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17463374 | BFLOAT16 SQUARE ROOT AND/OR RECIPROCAL SQUARE ROOT INSTRUCTIONS | August 2021 | December 2025 | Allow | 52 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16834834 | OPERATION CACHE | March 2020 | January 2026 | Allow | 60 | 10 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16747477 | Apparatus for Calculating and Retaining a Bound on Error during Floating-Point Operations and Methods Thereof | January 2020 | January 2021 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16562959 | DETERMINING AND PREDICTING DERIVED VALUES | September 2019 | April 2020 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16516513 | K-TIER ARCHITECTURE SCHEDULING | July 2019 | January 2021 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16502231 | REDUCING LATENCY OF COMMON SOURCE DATA MOVEMENT INSTRUCTIONS | July 2019 | February 2021 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16457970 | CORE-TO-CORE END "OFFLOAD" INSTRUCTION(S) | June 2019 | December 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16409993 | MANAGING AN ISSUE QUEUE FOR FUSED INSTRUCTIONS AND PAIRED INSTRUCTIONS IN A MICROPROCESSOR | May 2019 | August 2020 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16408749 | SYSTEM AND HANDLING OF REGISTER DATA IN PROCESSORS | May 2019 | November 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16239766 | INSTRUCTION PREFETCHING IN A COMPUTER PROCESSOR USING A PREFETCH PREDICTION VECTOR | January 2019 | January 2020 | Allow | 12 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16221379 | METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROL SIGNALLING IN A DATA PATH MODULE OF A DATA STREAM PROCESSING ENGINE | December 2018 | October 2020 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16178740 | PROCESSOR PREFETCHER MODE GOVERNOR FOR SWITCHING BETWEEN PREFETCH MODES | November 2018 | July 2020 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16154293 | Simultaneous Multi-Processor (SiMulPro) Apparatus, Simultaneous Transmit And Receive (STAR) Apparatus, DRAM Interface Apparatus, and Associated Methods | October 2018 | June 2019 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16117058 | Speeding Up Younger Store Instruction Execution After a Sync Instruction | August 2018 | January 2020 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15979657 | IDENTIFYING AND TRACKING FREQUENTLY ACCESSED REGISTERS IN A PROCESSOR | May 2018 | July 2020 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15973816 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES UTILIZING AN ELASTIC FLOATING-POINT NUMBER | May 2018 | October 2020 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15963243 | MANAGING OBSCURED BRANCH PREDICTION INFORMATION | April 2018 | December 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15880188 | MANAGING BRANCH PREDICTION INFORMATION FOR DIFFERENT CONTEXTS | January 2018 | September 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15844740 | Simultaneous Multi-Processor Apparatus Applicable to Acheiving Exascale Performance for Algorithms and Program Systems | December 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15822866 | PREDICTION OF AN AFFILIATED REGISTER | November 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15822261 | CLOCK-GATING FOR MULTICYCLE INSTRUCTIONS | November 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15819524 | DETERMINING AND PREDICTING AFFILIATED REGISTERS BASED ON DYNAMIC RUNTIME CONTROL FLOW ANALYSIS | November 2017 | October 2019 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15819450 | DETERMINING AND PREDICTING DERIVED VALUES USED IN REGISTER-INDIRECT BRANCHING | November 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15802776 | COMPUTERIZED BRANCH PREDICTIONS AND DECISIONS | November 2017 | September 2020 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15796032 | LOW-OVERHEAD, LOW-LATENCY OPERAND DEPENDENCY TRACKING FOR INSTRUCTIONS OPERATING ON REGISTER PAIRS IN A PROCESSOR CORE | October 2017 | January 2020 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15684573 | POWER SAVING BRANCH MODES IN HARDWARE | August 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 15680855 | DETERMINING AND PREDICTING DERIVED VALUES USED IN REGISTER-INDIRECT BRANCHING | August 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15680871 | PREDICTION OF AN AFFILIATED REGISTER | August 2017 | July 2020 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15680881 | CODE-SPECIFIC AFFILIATED REGISTER PREDICTION | August 2017 | August 2019 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15599770 | COMPUTERIZED BRANCH PREDICTIONS AND DECISIONS | May 2017 | September 2020 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15432551 | STOCHASTIC ROUNDING FLOATING-POINT ADD INSTRUCTION USING ENTROPY FROM A REGISTER | February 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 29 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15432462 | STOCHASTIC ROUNDING FLOATING-POINT MULTIPLY INSTRUCTION USING ENTROPY FROM A REGISTER | February 2017 | June 2019 | Allow | 28 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15342141 | BRANCH PREDICTION USING MULTIPLE VERSIONS OF HISTORY DATA | November 2016 | June 2017 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15342139 | BRANCH PREDICTION USING MULTIPLE VERSIONS OF HISTORY DATA | November 2016 | June 2017 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15289388 | POST-SILICON CONFIGURABLE INSTRUCTION BEHAVIOR BASED ON INPUT OPERANDS | October 2016 | April 2017 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15244741 | SPECULATIVE BRANCH HANDLING FOR TRANSACTION ABORT | August 2016 | November 2016 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15194666 | EXTENDING DATA RANGE ADDRESSING | June 2016 | April 2020 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15096407 | BRANCH PREDICTION USING MULTIPLE VERSIONS OF HISTORY DATA | April 2016 | July 2016 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15075771 | PREVENTING PREMATURE READS FROM A GENERAL PURPOSE REGISTER | March 2016 | January 2019 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15052090 | SPECULATIVE BRANCH HANDLING FOR TRANSACTION ABORT | February 2016 | June 2016 | Allow | 3 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15009372 | STOCHASTIC ROUNDING FLOATING-POINT MULTIPLY INSTRUCTION USING ENTROPY FROM A REGISTER | January 2016 | January 2020 | Allow | 48 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 15009397 | STOCHASTIC ROUNDING FLOATING-POINT ADD INSTRUCTION USING ENTROPY FROM A REGISTER | January 2016 | July 2019 | Allow | 42 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14952020 | FLUSHING SPECULATIVE INSTRUCTION PROCESSING | November 2015 | June 2016 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14871959 | EXTENDING DATA RANGE ADDRESSING | September 2015 | April 2020 | Allow | 55 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14684150 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING AN EFFICIENT SCATTER | April 2015 | October 2017 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14582859 | SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, AND METHODS FOR DATA SPECULATION EXECUTION | December 2014 | October 2020 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14519553 | INTRA-INSTRUCTIONAL TRANSACTION ABORT HANDLING | October 2014 | November 2015 | Allow | 13 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14501093 | SEMI-EXCLUSIVE SECOND-LEVEL BRANCH TARGET BUFFER | September 2014 | April 2016 | Allow | 19 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14501087 | ASYNCHRONOUS LOOKAHEAD HIERARCHICAL BRANCH PREDICTION | September 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13994582 | METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROL SIGNALING IN A DATA PATH MODULE OF A DATA STREAM PROCESSING ENGINE | August 2014 | August 2018 | Allow | 60 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14356816 | DIGITAL SIGNAL PROCESSOR, PROGRAM CONTROL METHOD, AND CONTROL PROGRAM | May 2014 | March 2017 | Allow | 34 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14169601 | SPECULATIVE LOAD ISSUE | January 2014 | March 2016 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13976435 | APPARATUS AND METHOD OF MASK PERMUTE INSTRUCTIONS | June 2013 | December 2016 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13976359 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PERFORMING A BINARY TRANSLATION | June 2013 | November 2017 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 13992236 | SYSTEMS, APPARATUSES, AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING A BUTTERFLY HORIZONTAL AND CROSS ADD OR SUBSTRACT IN RESPONSE TO A SINGLE INSTRUCTION | June 2013 | May 2016 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13991858 | EFFICIENT ZERO-BASED DECOMPRESSION | June 2013 | October 2016 | Allow | 40 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13868403 | MANAGEMENT OF SHARED TRANSACTIONAL RESOURCES | April 2013 | July 2016 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13868392 | DYNAMIC MANAGEMENT OF A TRANSACTION RETRY INDICATION | April 2013 | April 2016 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13841576 | OPTIMIZING PERFORMANCE FOR CONTEXT-DEPENDENT INSTRUCTIONS | March 2013 | April 2017 | Allow | 49 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 13799670 | SPECIAL CASE REGISTER UPDATE WITHOUT EXECUTION | March 2013 | September 2016 | Abandon | 42 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13783572 | RESTRICTED INSTRUCTIONS IN TRANSACTIONAL EXECUTION | March 2013 | May 2016 | Allow | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13783312 | RESTRICTING PROCESSING WITHIN A PROCESSOR TO FACILITATE TRANSACTION COMPLETION | March 2013 | November 2015 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13783353 | SAVING/RESTORING SELECTED REGISTERS IN TRANSACTIONAL PROCESSING | March 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13783357 | RANDOMIZED TESTING WITHIN TRANSACTIONAL EXECUTION | March 2013 | December 2015 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner METZGER, MICHAEL J.
With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 40.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner METZGER, MICHAEL J works in Art Unit 2183 and has examined 97 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 92.8%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 37 months.
Examiner METZGER, MICHAEL J's allowance rate of 92.8% places them in the 79% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by METZGER, MICHAEL J receive 2.10 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 56% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by METZGER, MICHAEL J is 37 months. This places the examiner in the 32% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by METZGER, MICHAEL J. This interview benefit is in the 43% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 38.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 63.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 88% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 7% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 62.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 40% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 20.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 12.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 12% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 15% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.