USPTO Examiner NGUYEN PHONG H - Art Unit 2156

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18933206Graphical System to Reduce Cognitive Costs of Outstanding Subportfolio DiscoveryOctober 2024March 2026Allow1610NoNo
18914454DATA STORAGE METHOD AND APPARATUS, COMPUTER DEVICE, PRODUCT, AND STORAGE MEDIUMOctober 2024January 2026Allow1510YesNo
18902312CONTROL OF NETWORK SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATIC ASSESSMENT AND REMEDIATION OF PROCESSING ANOMALIESSeptember 2024January 2026Allow1510NoNo
18886929HIGH-LEVEL QUERY CONVERSION SYSTEM WITH PREFIX-BASED SEARCH FOR DATA STORESSeptember 2024January 2026Allow1610YesNo
18791969SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING DATA RETRIEVAL FLOW RATE USING ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ENGINEAugust 2024November 2025Allow1510NoNo
18772758K-D Tree Balanced SplittingJuly 2024October 2025Allow1510YesNo
18771021Hot Growing A Cloud Hosted Block DeviceJuly 2024November 2025Allow1610YesNo
18678189SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ESTIMATING STABILITY OF A DATASETMay 2024March 2026Allow2120NoNo
18671203USING ATOMIC OPERATIONS TO IMPLEMENT A READ-WRITE LOCKMay 2024December 2025Allow1820YesNo
18712096FILTERED PRODUCT STRUCTUREMay 2024November 2025Allow1820YesNo
18711087EFFICIENT VERIFICATION OF DIFFERENTIALLY-PRIVATE DIGITAL DATAMay 2024September 2025Allow1620YesNo
18652401Hierarchal Data Structure ModificationMay 2024July 2025Allow1510YesNo
18635960PROVIDING SUGGESTIONS FOR INTERACTION WITH AN AUTOMATED ASSISTANT IN A MULTI-USER MESSAGE EXCHANGE THREADApril 2024October 2025Allow1820YesNo
18622023DATA COMPRESSION USING SORT-BASED ENCODERMarch 2024August 2025Allow1620YesNo
18605223HIERARCHICAL, TEMPORAL, AND POSITIONAL DATA STRUCTURE FOR GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI)March 2024November 2025Allow2020YesNo
18599337STORING A POINT IN TIME COHERENTLY FOR A DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEMMarch 2024September 2025Allow1820NoNo
18416606COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHODS AND COMPUTING SYSTEMS FOR REORGANIZING DATAJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2020NoNo
18414195AGGREGATED EMBEDDINGS FOR A CORPUS GRAPHJanuary 2024December 2025Allow2330YesNo
18412664WEBSITE BUILDER WITH INTEGRATED SEARCH ENGINE OPTIMIZATION SUPPORTJanuary 2024October 2025Allow2130YesNo
18390865ITEM RECOMMENDATION AND SEARCH USING GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) TAXONOMY-BASED IMAGE GENERATIONDecember 2023February 2025Allow1420YesYes
18390116Packing Mechanism for Mitigating Collisions and Improving Efficiency for a Hash FunctionDecember 2023February 2026Allow2530YesNo
18481232GENERALIZED REVERSIBILITY FRAMEWORK FOR COMMON KNOWLEDGE IN SCALE-OUT DATABASE SYSTEMSOctober 2023January 2026Allow2830NoNo
18467289REINFORCEMENT LEARNING BASED SEARCH RESULTSSeptember 2023October 2025Allow2510YesNo
18465936VOLUMETRIC VECTOR NODE AND OBJECT BASED MULTI-DIMENSIONAL OPERATING SYSTEMSeptember 2023August 2025Allow2320YesNo
18229568FAST BATCH-STYLE LOOKUP, AGGREGATION, AND FORMULA PROCESSING SYSTEM FOR A MULTIDIMENSIONAL SPACEAugust 2023September 2025Allow2620YesNo
18342367MAPPING DATA-SERIALIZATION ELEMENTS BETWEEN A SOURCE AND A DESTINATIONJune 2023March 2026Allow3330YesNo
18143956INTELLIGENT GROUPING OF ORDER OBJECTSMay 2023October 2025Allow3010YesNo
18139610Cloud Resource Risk Scenario Assessment and RemediationApril 2023October 2025Allow2920NoNo
18171439Automated External Data Source InterfacingFebruary 2023August 2025Allow3030YesNo
18146353GENERATING PERSONALIZED CONTENT FOR PRESENTATION ON USER DEVICESDecember 2022September 2025Allow3310NoNo
17991430CROSS ROW CONSISTENT DATA ACCESSINGNovember 2022February 2026Allow3850YesNo
17914913METHOD FOR INTEGRATION AND COORDINATION OF MEASUREMENT AND/OR CONTROL SYSTEMSSeptember 2022January 2026Allow4020NoNo
17646455INDEX NODE ALLOCATION METHOD, DATA PROCESSING DEVICE AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIUMDecember 2021March 2026Allow5040NoNo
16386343INTER-TABLE PARALLEL REFRESH MAXIMIZERApril 2019January 2020Allow920NoNo
16270921SCREEN CAPTURE DATA AMALGAMATIONFebruary 2019February 2021Allow2420YesNo
16195501AUTOMATIC IDENTIFICATION AND CLUSTERING OF PATTERNSNovember 2018April 2021Allow2910NoNo
16130512ANALYZING AND CORRECTING CORRUPTION WHICH CAUSED FILESYSTEM CHECKER FAILURE SO THAT THE FILESYSTEM CHECKER WILL RUN WITHOUT ERRORSeptember 2018August 2020Allow2310YesNo
16130468ANALYZING AND CORRECTING CORRUPTION WHICH CAUSED FILESYSTEM CHECKER FAILURE SO THAT THE FILESYSTEM CHECKER WILL RUN WITHOUT ERRORSeptember 2018August 2020Allow2310YesNo
15974786VIRTUAL ACTION-BASED TROUBLESHOOTERMay 2018March 2021Allow3420NoNo
15888145Cognitive Ranking of Terms Used During a ConversationFebruary 2018August 2020Allow3110YesNo
15869874INTER-TABLE PARALLEL REFRESH MAXIMIZERJanuary 2018March 2020Allow2620YesNo
15837061Ambiguity Resolution System and Method for Security Information RetrievalDecember 2017August 2020Allow3220YesNo
15833770SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SHARING USER GENERATED SLIDE OBJECTS OVER A NETWORKDecember 2017October 2018Abandon1130YesNo
15478016SYNCHRONIZATION METHODS AND SYSTEMSApril 2017May 2020Allow3720YesNo
15283091COOPERATIVE DECENTRALIZED REBUILD SCANNINGSeptember 2016September 2017Allow1210NoNo
15281243INTER-TABLE PARALLEL REFRESH MAXIMIZERSeptember 2016January 2019Allow2820YesNo
15215614SECURE DATA MIGRATION IN A DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORKJuly 2016April 2017Allow920NoNo
15213343RETRIEVING DATA UTILIZING A DISTRIBUTED INDEXJuly 2016March 2017Allow810NoNo
15206619AUGMENTED REVIEWS WITH COGNITIVE REASONINGJuly 2016April 2020Allow4540YesNo
15206637INFERRING GRAPH TOPOLOGIESJuly 2016February 2020Allow4330NoNo
15181821SPIRITUAL RESEARCH SYSTEM AND METHODJune 2016July 2017Allow1310NoNo
14967721MULTIMEDIA INTEGRATION DESCRIPTION SCHEME, METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MPEG-7December 2015July 2016Allow710NoNo
14962456Content AuthoringDecember 2015April 2019Allow4030YesNo
14841020APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DATA PROCESSINGAugust 2015May 2018Allow3210NoNo
14834050ENHANCING QUERIES FOR DATA TABLES WITH NESTED FIELDSAugust 2015October 2016Allow1430YesNo
14803485HIERARCHICAL RANKING OF FACIAL ATTRIBUTESJuly 2015February 2016Allow610NoNo
14796080AGGREGATING MODIFICATIONS TO A DATABASE FOR JOURNAL REPLAYJuly 2015May 2019Allow4650YesNo
14737675ANALYZING AND CORRECTING CORRUPTION WHICH CAUSED FILESYSTEM CHECKER FAILURE SO THAT THE FILESYSTEM CHECKER WILL RUN WITHOUT ERRORJune 2015May 2018Allow3630YesNo
14738070AGGREGATING MODIFICATIONS TO A DATABASE FOR JOURNAL REPLAYJune 2015May 2019Allow4750YesNo
14720810ATTRIBUTE CATEGORY ENHANCED SEARCHMay 2015January 2016Allow810NoNo
14662029ATTRIBUTE CATEGORY ENHANCED SEARCHMarch 2015January 2016Allow1010YesNo
14612856ENABLING TESTING OF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS WITHOUT AFFECTING CUSTOMER DATA SETS SYSTEM AND METHODFebruary 2015July 2017Allow3040YesNo
14610082ANALYZING AND CORRECTING CORRUPTION WHICH CAUSED FILESYSTEM CHECKER FAILURE SO THAT THE FILESYSTEM CHECKER WILL RUN WITHOUT ERRORJanuary 2015June 2018Allow4030YesNo
14592537TECHNIQUES FOR ESTABLISHING A FILE SYSTEM THAT EXPOSES A VIRTUAL FILE SYSTEM FOR BACKUP OPERATIONSJanuary 2015November 2016Allow2320YesNo
14571282COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING RELATED MESSAGESDecember 2014March 2016Allow1510NoNo
14508903SYNCHRONIZATION METHODS AND SYSTEMSOctober 2014May 2016Allow1940YesNo
14466882MEDIA CONTENT DISCOVERY AND CHARACTER ORGANIZATION TECHNIQUESAugust 2014May 2015Allow910NoNo
14326008SYSTEMS, METHODS, APPARATUSES, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTS FOR FORENSIC MONITORINGJuly 2014September 2016Allow2640YesYes
14281453HYBRID BUFFER MANAGEMENT SCHEME FOR IMMUTABLE PAGESMay 2014March 2017Allow3420YesNo
14280711SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DISPLAYING, CONNECTING AND ANALYZING DATA IN AN ONLINE COLLABORATIVE WEBPAGEMay 2014May 2018Allow4750NoNo
14235151INFORMATION RETRIEVAL SYSTEM, METHOD, AND PROGRAMMay 2014June 2017Allow4130YesNo
14358770SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DATA STORAGEMay 2014February 2017Allow3320YesNo
14280457AUTOMATIC GENERATION OF PLAYLISTS FROM DIGITAL CONTENT EMBEDDED ON THIRD-PARTY SERVICESMay 2014September 2016Allow2810YesNo
14256662SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SEARCH INDEXINGApril 2014October 2016Allow3020YesNo
14256530Volumetric Vector Node and Object Based Multi-Dimensional Operating SystemApril 2014January 2017Allow3320YesNo
14256198ENABLING TESTING OF PRODUCTION SYSTEMS WITHOUT AFFECTING CUSTOMER DATA SETS SYSTEM AND METHODApril 2014July 2017Allow3940NoNo
14256541STORAGE CONTROL DEVICE AND STORAGE CONTROL METHODApril 2014September 2016Allow2910NoNo
14256469ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR PROCESSING CLIPS OF DOCUMENTSApril 2014November 2016Allow3120NoNo
14244753CONTEXT DEPENDENT RECOGNITIONApril 2014April 2015Allow1310YesNo
14231866ORDERING SEARCH-ENGINE RESULTSApril 2014July 2014Allow320NoNo
14225858TRANSLATION AND TRANSCRIPTION CONTENT CONVERSIONMarch 2014November 2014Allow810YesNo
14192177SEARCH SYSTEM WITH QUERY REFINEMENT AND SEARCH METHODFebruary 2014October 2015Allow2030YesNo
14147670HIERARCHICAL RANKING OF FACIAL ATTRIBUTESJanuary 2014April 2015Allow1510NoNo
13956656PROTECTING STORAGE DATA DURING SYSTEM MIGRATIONAugust 2013June 2017Allow4640NoNo
13947794BLOB MANIPULATION IN AN INTEGRATED STRUCTURED STORAGE SYSTEMJuly 2013June 2014Allow1110YesNo
13943352RETRIEVING INDEXED DATA FROM A DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORKJuly 2013May 2016Allow3410NoNo
13913229REMOTE ENUMERATION OF A DIRECTORYJune 2013June 2016Allow3620NoNo
13913214DETERMINING WIRELESS ACCESS POINT LOCATIONS USING CLUSTERED DATA POINTSJune 2013February 2016Allow3310YesNo
13908516DATA DE-DUPLICATION IN A DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORK UTILIZING DATA CHARACTERIZATIONJune 2013February 2014Allow810NoNo
13854832SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING ORIGINALITY OF DATA CONTENTApril 2013April 2014Allow1310YesNo
13833209Method, A System and a Computer Program Product for Scoring a Profile in Social Networking SystemMarch 2013September 2015Allow3010NoNo
13833340SPIRITUAL RESEARCH SYSTEM AND METHODMarch 2013April 2016Allow3720NoNo
13833334ENHANCING QUERIES FOR DATA TABLES WITH NESTED FIELDSMarch 2013June 2015Allow2710YesNo
13767082FACE PHOTOGRAPH-BASED DATING RECOMMENDATION SYSTEMFebruary 2013June 2014Allow1610YesNo
13763200PERSON-BASED INFORMATION AGGREGATIONFebruary 2013February 2014Allow1220YesNo
13737075HIERARCHICAL RANKING OF FACIAL ATTRIBUTESJanuary 2013September 2013Allow810YesNo
13718961RETRIEVING DATA UTILIZING A DISTRIBUTED INDEXDecember 2012July 2016Allow4340NoNo
13718727QUERY EXPANSION CLASSIFIER FOR E-COMMERCEDecember 2012May 2015Allow2810NoNo
13718985SECURE DATA MIGRATION IN A DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORKDecember 2012July 2016Allow5440NoNo
13649991MULTIMEDIA SHARING APPARATUS USING COPY OF METADATA DATABASE OF PORTABLE TERMINAL AND METHOD THEREOFOctober 2012February 2016Allow4160NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner NGUYEN, PHONG H.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
4
Examiner Affirmed
3
(75.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(25.0%)
Reversal Percentile
38.6%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 25.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
13
Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(30.8%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
9
(69.2%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
46.6%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 30.8% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner NGUYEN, PHONG H - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner NGUYEN, PHONG H works in Art Unit 2156 and has examined 186 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.9%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 32 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner NGUYEN, PHONG H's allowance rate of 98.9% places them in the 92% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by NGUYEN, PHONG H receive 2.31 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 65% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by NGUYEN, PHONG H is 32 months. This places the examiner in the 50% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a -1.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by NGUYEN, PHONG H. This interview benefit is in the 10% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 34.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 39.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 60% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 76.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 38.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 62.5% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 11.8% of allowed cases (in the 95% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 1.1% of allowed cases (in the 62% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.