USPTO Examiner RUIZ ARACELIS - Art Unit 2139

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18987096CROSS SCENARIO FALL THROUGH (XSFT)December 2024July 2025Allow710NoNo
18980680MEMORY ARCHITECTURE FOR BLOCK MIGRATION IN ZNSDecember 2024March 2026Allow1510NoNo
18954809NON-DETERMINISTIC MEMORY PROTOCOLNovember 2024March 2026Allow1610NoNo
18928244SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHARING A CACHE LINE BETWEEN NON-CONTIGUOUS MEMORY AREASOctober 2024January 2026Allow1510YesNo
18926027DETECTING MEMORY HAZARDS IN MASSIVELY PARALLEL AND DISTRIBUTED SYSTEMSOctober 2024November 2025Allow1200NoNo
18910922PHYSICAL ADDRESS PROXY (PAP) RESIDENCY DETERMINATION FOR REDUCTION OF PAP REUSEOctober 2024October 2025Allow1210NoNo
18894180STATIC POWER REDUCTION IN CACHES USING DETERMINISTIC NAPSSeptember 2024February 2026Allow1610NoNo
18887886SYNCHRONIZED REQUEST HANDLING AT A MEMORY DEVICESeptember 2024January 2026Allow1610NoNo
18886862VIRTUALLY-INDEXED CACHE COHERENCY USING PHYSICAL ADDRESS PROXIESSeptember 2024September 2025Allow1210NoNo
18829981FILE SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS FOR ZONED STORAGE DEVICE OPERATIONSSeptember 2024August 2025Allow1100NoNo
18823947PHYSICAL ADDRESS PROXY REUSE MANAGEMENTSeptember 2024November 2025Allow1410NoNo
18814148USAGE DRIVEN MEMORY MAPPINGAugust 2024March 2026Allow1810NoNo
18809646METHODS AND APPARATUS TO BOOT FROM BLOCK DEVICESAugust 2024March 2026Allow1911NoNo
18837493SNOOP FILTER SCALABILITYAugust 2024May 2025Allow1000NoNo
18787516PAGING METADATA INTO MEMORYJuly 2024March 2026Allow2010NoNo
18777905System Control Using Sparse DataJuly 2024February 2026Allow1811NoNo
18769631Profile Guided Memory TrimmingJuly 2024October 2025Allow1510NoNo
18768696CACHE REPLACEMENT CONTROLJuly 2024December 2025Allow1720NoNo
18767757PERFORMING SNOOP FILTER REPLACEMENT BASED ON HISTORY-AUGMENTED VICTIMIZATION PRIORITY VALUES OF SNOOP FILTER ENTRIES IN PROCESSOR-BASED DEVICESJuly 2024August 2025Allow1300NoNo
18762201ELECTRONIC DEVICES, INCLUDING MEMORY DEVICES, AND OPERATING METHODS THEREOFJuly 2024September 2025Allow1401NoNo
18760409Data Storage Device and Method for Device-Initiated HibernationJuly 2024June 2025Allow1110YesNo
18742099SAFE SHARED-MEMORY COMMUNICATIONJune 2024March 2026Allow2110NoNo
18668455SMART MEMORY MODULE, HOST SYSTEM HAVING SMART MEMORY MODULE, AND METHOD OF OPERATING SMART MEMORY MODULEMay 2024February 2026Allow2011YesNo
18664142VALID DATA IDENTIFICATION FOR GARBAGE COLLECTIONMay 2024May 2025Allow1210NoNo
18644246METHODS FOR CACHE INSERTION AND CACHE EVICTION IN A CACHE SYSTEM THAT INCLUDES A REVERSE CACHE AND A MAIN CACHEApril 2024August 2025Allow1620NoNo
18638454LOGGING CACHE LINE LIFETIME HINTS WHEN RECORDING BIT-ACCURATE TRACEApril 2024February 2025Allow1010NoNo
18628916METHOD OF DETERMINING A CACHE SIZE USING AN ESTIMATION OF A NUMBER OF REQUESTS FOR CACHE MEMORY AND A SIZE OF THE REQUESTSApril 2024August 2025Allow1610NoNo
18625452Systems and Methods For Priority-Aware Cache ReplacementApril 2024October 2025Allow1810NoNo
18610153UNIFIED VIRTUAL MEMORY MANAGEMENT IN HETEROGENEOUS COMPUTING SYSTEMSMarch 2024June 2025Allow1520YesNo
18607525Hardware assisted Page Migration in a Multi-Dielet Processing SystemMarch 2024February 2026Allow2311YesNo
18604184SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MULTICASTING DATAMarch 2024May 2025Allow1400NoNo
18600150MEMORY BUFFER MANAGEMENT ON HARDWARE DEVICES UTILIZING DISTRIBUTED DECENTRALIZED MEMORY BUFFER MONITORINGMarch 2024September 2024Allow700NoNo
18598134Systems and Methods for Birth Time-Based FIFO Cache ReapingMarch 2024August 2025Allow1710NoNo
18594408APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF FOR DRAM INITIALIZATIONMarch 2024September 2025Allow1810YesNo
18593435VERY LARGE ADDRESS SPACE USING EXTENDED PAGE TABLESMarch 2024July 2025Allow1700NoNo
18591718RECALL PENDING CACHE LINE EVICTIONFebruary 2024February 2025Allow1110NoNo
18591901SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MONITORING AND MANAGING CACHE DATA TO OPTIMIZE USE AND STORAGE OF DEVICE MEMORYFebruary 2024March 2026Allow2510NoNo
18586225SYSTEM AND METHOD TO MANAGE CACHE SIZE FOR BURSTY CONCURRENT APPLICATION TRANSACTIONS USING DYNAMICALLY ADJUSTABLE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY CACHE SIZE LIMITSFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1810YesNo
18585008BYTE-ADDRESSABLE DEVICE AND COMPUTING SYSTEM INCLUDING SAMEFebruary 2024December 2024Allow1010NoNo
18583341Packet Cache System and MethodFebruary 2024September 2024Allow710NoNo
18443005ADDRESS MAPPING TABLE COMPRESSIONFebruary 2024July 2025Allow1700NoNo
18432096FLASH MEMORY CONTROLLER AND DATA PROGRAMMING METHODFebruary 2024January 2025Allow1100NoNo
18431707BLOCK MATCHING BETWEEN FIRST DATA AND SECOND DATAFebruary 2024April 2025Allow1400NoNo
18293858INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD WITH LOCK FOR EXCLUSIVE ACCESS TO DATA IN MEMORYJanuary 2024March 2025Allow1400NoNo
18428422DYNAMIC UPDATING OF CONTENT ADDRESSABLE ASSOCIATIVE MEMORIES FOR LARGE LANGUAGE MODELSJanuary 2024August 2025Allow1910NoNo
18418689CANCELLING CACHE ALLOCATION TRANSACTIONSJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2010NoNo
18411763CONTROLLER WITH CACHING AND NON-CACHING MODESJanuary 2024July 2025Allow1820NoNo
18410238USING SPECIAL DATA STORAGE PARAMETERS WHEN STORING COLD STREAM DATA IN A DATA STORAGE DEVICEJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2220YesNo
18407071USING PHYSICAL ADDRESS PROXIES TO HANDLE SYNONYMS WHEN WRITING STORE DATA TO A VIRTUALLY-INDEXED CACHEJanuary 2024August 2024Allow710NoNo
18399517METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DESIGNING CACHE MEMORY STRUCTURE BASED ON ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCEDecember 2023June 2025Allow1810NoNo
18543352Smart Cache CleanerDecember 2023June 2025Allow1810YesNo
18524412SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CACHE ALLOCATIONNovember 2023June 2025Allow1910YesNo
18523249ORDER ENFORCEMENT FOR DELEGABLE MEMORY ACCESSESNovember 2023May 2025Allow1800NoNo
18510232CACHE MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING CACHE SCHEDULING USING SAMENovember 2023March 2024Allow400NoNo
18388782DYNAMIC SINGLE-LEVEL CELL WRITE THROUGH IN MEMORY DEVICESNovember 2023April 2025Allow1700YesNo
18386911DATA TEMPERATURE ASSOCIATED WITH TLB FLUSH REQUESTNovember 2023September 2024Allow1110NoNo
18385176HARDWARE QUEUE HANDLING SYSTEM, METHOD, SOLID STATE DRIVE CONTROLLER, AND SOLID-STATE DRIVEOctober 2023August 2025Allow2120NoNo
18492296MEMORY SYSTEM WITH THREADED TRANSACTION SUPPORTOctober 2023September 2024Allow1110NoNo
18485395STORAGE DEVICES AND OPERATING METHODS THEREOFOctober 2023April 2025Allow1810NoNo
18483384SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COUPLED CACHE MANAGEMENTOctober 2023July 2024Allow1010NoNo
18482646BYTE-ADDRESSABLE DEVICE AND COMPUTING SYSTEM INCLUDING SAMEOctober 2023December 2023Allow200NoNo
18481784ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND COMPUTING SYSTEM INCLUDING SAMEOctober 2023January 2024Allow300NoNo
18478255DATA STORAGE THROUGH OFFLOADING SIGNATURE COMPUTATIONSSeptember 2023June 2025Allow2020YesNo
18475890System Control Using Sparse DataSeptember 2023April 2024Allow700NoNo
18471998PROCESSORS WITH TOGGLEABLE MEMORY TAGGING EXTENSIONS AND RELATED METHODSSeptember 2023March 2026Allow3020NoNo
18243923STORAGE DEVICE PERFORMING ATOMIC WRITE, HOST CONTROLLING STORAGE DEVICE, AND OPERATING METHOD OF STORAGE DEVICESeptember 2023April 2025Allow1900NoNo
18548320LOGGING CACHE LINE LIFETIME HINTS WHEN RECORDING BIT-ACCURATE TRACEAugust 2023January 2024Allow500NoNo
18456568GLOBAL COHERENCE OPERATIONSAugust 2023July 2024Allow1110NoNo
18238323NON-DETERMINISTIC MEMORY PROTOCOLAugust 2023July 2024Allow1110NoNo
18454431BACKUP MANAGEMENT DEVICE AND BACKUP DESTINATION MIGRATION METHODAugust 2023October 2024Allow1400NoNo
18450079STATIC POWER REDUCTION IN CACHES USING DETERMINISTIC NAPSAugust 2023June 2024Allow1010NoNo
18232040PROACTIVE CACHING OF DATA FOR ACCELERATOR CORES IN A STORAGE DEVICEAugust 2023July 2025Allow2310YesNo
18230689SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SHARING A CACHE LINE BETWEEN NON-CONTIGUOUS MEMORY AREASAugust 2023June 2024Allow1110NoNo
18227466Data Storage Device and Method for Time-Pooled Hot Data RelocationJuly 2023March 2025Allow1911YesNo
18227739SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PREFETCHING DATAJuly 2023July 2025Allow2420YesNo
18361159MEMORY CONTROLLER WITH COMMAND REORDERINGJuly 2023March 2025Allow2010NoNo
18225789Data Storage Device with Balanced Background Operations and Method ThereforJuly 2023November 2024Allow1610YesNo
18357952MEMORY CONTROLLER FOR A HIGH CAPACITY MEMORY CIRCUIT USING VIRTUAL BANK ADDRESSINGJuly 2023April 2025Allow2000NoNo
18356219MEMORY SYSTEM AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF FOR ALLOCATING AND STORING META DATAJuly 2023June 2025Allow2320YesNo
18356539DYNAMIC PLANE SELECTION IN DATA STORAGE SYSTEMJuly 2023August 2024Allow1300NoNo
18356693SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPROVING FIND LAST GOOD PAGE PROCESSING IN MEMORY DEVICESJuly 2023July 2024Allow1200NoNo
18223691Data Storage Device and Method for Host-Assisted Deferred Defragmentation and System HandlingJuly 2023June 2025Allow2321YesNo
18354310Illusory Free Data Storage Space in Data Storage DevicesJuly 2023June 2025Allow2310NoNo
18349053ENCODING AND COMPRESSING BITS WITH WRITE-X FEATURE IN MEMORY SYSTEMJuly 2023March 2025Allow2101NoNo
18215414METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR DE-DUPLICATING DATAJune 2023February 2025Allow1910NoNo
18336154Determining Caching Parameter Metrics for Caching Data ElementsJune 2023December 2024Allow1800YesNo
18311207STORAGE DEVICE FOR COMPRESSING AND STORING DATA, AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFMay 2023May 2025Allow2520YesNo
18307734DYNAMIC MEMORY REFRESH INTERVAL TO REDUCE BANDWIDTH PENALTYApril 2023February 2026Allow3340NoNo
18302968Method And Apparatus For a Page-Local Delta-Based PrefetcherApril 2023June 2024Allow1420YesNo
18136217TRANSACTION-BASED STORAGE SYSTEM AND METHOD THAT USES VARIABLE SIZED OBJECTS TO STORE DATAApril 2023May 2024Allow1310NoNo
18297022STORAGE DEVICE FOR A PLURALITY OF META DATA AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAMEApril 2023April 2025Allow2410NoNo
18295482STORAGE SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE DATA PATHS DEPENDING ON DATA CLASSIFICATIONSApril 2023July 2025Allow2720YesNo
18123336CONTROL METHOD OF FLASH MEMORY CONTROLLER AND ASSOCIATED FLASH MEMORY CONTROLLER AND STORAGE DEVICEMarch 2023December 2024Allow2110NoNo
18121111PROVIDING ACCESS TO A NAMESPACE VIA MULTIPLE STORAGE ARRAYSMarch 2023May 2024Allow1400NoNo
18115457Address Range Encoding in System on a Chip with Securely Partitioned Memory SpaceFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2400NoNo
18042974Method for Determining Physical Address and Chip SystemFebruary 2023May 2024Allow1500NoNo
18162884VOLUME PROMOTION MANAGEMENT AND VISUALIZATION IN A METRO CLUSTERFebruary 2023July 2024Allow1700NoNo
18162724ACCESSING METHOD OF MEMORY MODULE BASED ON DIFFERENT CONFIGURATIONS OF PHYSICAL MANAGEMENT UNIT, MEMORY STORAGE DEVICE, AND MEMORY CONTROL CIRCUIT UNITFebruary 2023April 2025Allow2720NoNo
18162069DYNAMIC NODE CLUSTER WITH STORAGE ARRAYJanuary 2023July 2024Allow1800NoNo
18159848System and Method for Managing Storage Saturation in Storage SystemsJanuary 2023September 2024Allow1900NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner RUIZ, ARACELIS.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
5
Examiner Affirmed
5
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
4.2%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
9
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(22.2%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(77.8%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
29.4%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 22.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is below the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal has limited effectiveness in prompting favorable reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner RUIZ, ARACELIS - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner RUIZ, ARACELIS works in Art Unit 2139 and has examined 543 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 91.7%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 22 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner RUIZ, ARACELIS's allowance rate of 91.7% places them in the 77% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by RUIZ, ARACELIS receive 1.47 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 24% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by RUIZ, ARACELIS is 22 months. This places the examiner in the 88% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +8.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by RUIZ, ARACELIS. This interview benefit is in the 38% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 36.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 81% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 70.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 92% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 40.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 37% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show below-average success with this examiner. Consider whether your arguments are strong enough to warrant a PAC request.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 61.5% of appeals filed. This is in the 39% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 37.5% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 60.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 64% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.6% of allowed cases (in the 61% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 17.7% of allowed cases (in the 93% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.