USPTO Examiner HO AARON D - Art Unit 2139

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19015326METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEMORY MANAGEMENT IN MEMORY DISAGGREGATION ENVIRONMENTJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1310NoNo
18829608Command Processing In Sequential Write Required ZoneSeptember 2024February 2026Allow1710YesNo
18814125MEMORY DEVICE FOR PERFORMING IN-MEMORY PROCESSINGAugust 2024November 2025Allow1510NoNo
18748715WORDLINE LEAKAGE TEST MANAGEMENTJune 2024March 2026Allow2130NoNo
18744992PSEUDO-FIRST IN, FIRST OUT (FIFO) TAG LINE REPLACEMENTJune 2024August 2025Allow1420NoNo
18635535MEMORY CHANNEL CONTROLLER OPERATION BASED ON DATA TYPESApril 2024October 2025Allow1830YesNo
18419206ARRAY ACCESS WITH RECEIVER MASKINGJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2040YesNo
18403250POINT-IN-TIME BACKUP OF APPLICATION DATA STORED ON DISPARATE STORAGE SYSTEMSJanuary 2024August 2025Allow1900NoNo
18401643Metadata Page Prefetch Processing for Incoming IO OperationsJanuary 2024May 2025Allow1620NoNo
18503118INTELLIGENT MANAGEMENT OF FERROELECTRIC MEMORY IN A DATA STORAGE DEVICENovember 2023March 2025Allow1710YesNo
18498032OPERATING METHOD OF STORAGE CONTROLLER MANAGING SYSTEM MEMORY BLOCKS AND STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAMEOctober 2023January 2026Allow2720YesNo
18383729ADAPTIVE GENERATION OF MEMORY PARTITIONSOctober 2023May 2025Allow1810YesNo
18556468TECHNIQUE FOR CONSTRAINING ACCESS TO MEMORY USING CAPABILITIESOctober 2023March 2026Allow2910NoNo
18490884System and Method for Hybrid Capacity Expansion of Virtual Storage Appliances Deployed on Cloud Storage DevicesOctober 2023March 2025Allow1720YesNo
18490673TECHNIQUES FOR MEMORY RESOURCE CONTROL USING MEMORY RESOURCE PARTITIONING AND MONITORINGOctober 2023July 2025Allow2120YesNo
18486702OPTIMAL ENVIRONMENT SIZING FOR PERFORMING ASSET BACKUP OPERATIONSOctober 2023August 2025Allow2200NoNo
18478952APPENDING DATA TO A TAPE CARTRIDGE DURING RECALL OPERATIONSSeptember 2023July 2024Allow1010YesNo
18471680ORCHESTRATION OF UNMAP REQUESTS RECEIVED FROM WRITE CACHE INSTANCES OF A DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEMSeptember 2023June 2025Allow2100NoNo
18468742APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY MANAGING HOST PERFORMANCE BOOSTER CONTROL MODESeptember 2023January 2025Allow1610YesNo
18468918DYNAMIC CACHE LOADING AND VERIFICATIONSeptember 2023November 2025Allow2640YesNo
18464797System and Method for Managing Metadata Access Locking in CacheSeptember 2023April 2025Allow1920NoNo
18461661MEMORY SYSTEM, CONTROL DEVICE, AND METHOD FOR COMBINING/DIVIDING OF DATA IN DATA TRANSFERSeptember 2023March 2026Abandon3040YesNo
18454693COMBINED ON-PACKAGE AND OFF-PACKAGE MEMORY SYSTEMAugust 2023April 2024Allow810YesNo
18227899SOLVING SUBMISSION QUEUE ENTRY OVERFLOW WITH SHADOW SUBMISSION QUEUEJuly 2023October 2025Allow2611YesNo
18355771Redundant Storage Across Namespaces with Dynamically Allocated Capacity in Data Storage DevicesJuly 2023January 2025Allow1810YesNo
18220355Data Storage Device and Method for Swap DefragmentationJuly 2023July 2024Allow1300NoNo
18217736UNIVERSAL FLASH STORAGE (UFS) DEVICE AND METHOD OF WRITING DATA TO A REPLAY PROTECTED MEMORY BLOCK (RPMB) REGION OF A UFSJuly 2023June 2024Allow1110YesNo
18298384ERROR CORRECTING MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAMEApril 2023January 2026Allow3350YesNo
18189982Reducing Translation Lookaside Buffer Searches for Splintered PagesMarch 2023April 2024Allow1320YesNo
18126232METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MEMORY MANAGEMENT IN MEMORY DISAGGREGATION ENVIRONMENTMarch 2023October 2024Allow1810YesNo
18125218METHODS, DEVICES, AND SYSTEMS FOR ALLOCATING MEMORY SPACEMarch 2023January 2025Allow2210YesNo
18116740RECOVERY OF CLUSTERED STORAGE SYSTEMSMarch 2023January 2025Allow2330YesNo
17993618MANAGEMENT OF A MEMORY FIREWALL IN A SYSTEM ON CHIPNovember 2022June 2025Allow3120NoNo
17977144ACTIVE-ACTIVE STORAGE SYSTEM AND ADDRESS ASSIGNMENT METHODOctober 2022March 2023Allow500YesNo
17970674Pseudo-First In, First Out (FIFO) Tag Line ReplacementOctober 2022February 2024Allow1620YesNo
17898667TRANSLATING VIRTUAL ADDRESSES IN A VIRTUAL MEMORY BASED SYSTEMAugust 2022December 2022Allow400YesNo
17879967METHOD OF OPERATING A STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING DETECTING AN ABNORMAL AREA, WHERE AN ACCESS TIME EXCEEDS A REFERENCE LATENCY, AS AN OPTIONAL AREA IN THE NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND STORING OPTIONAL DATA IN THE OPTIONAL AREA, AND A STORAGE DEVICE FOR PERFORMING THE METHODAugust 2022December 2024Allow2810YesNo
17877240WORDLINE LEAKAGE TEST MANAGEMENTJuly 2022March 2024Allow2020YesNo
17877023SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING COUNTERFEIT MEMORYJuly 2022April 2024Allow2110NoNo
17815366CLIENT ALLOCATION OF MEMORY ACROSS MEMORY SERVERSJuly 2022December 2024Allow2910YesNo
17860293DATA BLOCK TRANSFER WITH EXTENDED READ BUFFERINGJuly 2022May 2023Allow1000NoNo
17856637ADAPTIVE RAS PLATFORM BASED ON CORRELATIVE PREDICTIONJuly 2022January 2026Allow4210YesNo
17855549EXTENDING SSD LONGEVITYJune 2022October 2023Abandon1610NoNo
17839429SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A CROSS-LAYER KEY-VALUE STORE WITH A COMPUTATIONAL STORAGE DEVICEJune 2022March 2025Allow3330YesNo
17836912CACHE WITH SET ASSOCIATIVITY HAVING DATA DEFINED CACHE SETSJune 2022February 2024Allow2030NoNo
17744617MULTI-VALUE MAPPING FOR OBJECT STOREMay 2022December 2024Allow3130YesNo
17739379ZERO COPY MESSAGE RECEPTION FOR APPLICATIONSMay 2022January 2023Allow910NoNo
17657498ACCESSING ENCODED BLOCKS OF DATAMarch 2022January 2024Allow2220YesNo
17701777FINAL CACHE DIRECTORY STATE INDICATIONMarch 2022December 2023Allow2020YesNo
17675533HINT-BASED FAST DATA OPERATIONS WITH REPLICATION IN OBJECT-BASED STORAGEFebruary 2022September 2024Allow3130YesNo
17597985PERFORMANCE BENCHMARK FOR HOST PERFORMANCE BOOSTERJanuary 2022March 2025Allow3840YesNo
17575869FLEXIBLE DEPROVISIONING OF DISTRIBUTED STORAGEJanuary 2022September 2022Allow800YesNo
17644085Optimizing Data Placement Based on Data Temperature and Lifetime PredictionDecember 2021July 2025Allow4340YesYes
17544240SECURING SENSITIVE DATA IN MEMORYDecember 2021September 2024Abandon3320YesNo
17457829MANAGING SINGLE-LEVEL AND MULTI-LEVEL PROGRAMMING OPERATIONSDecember 2021April 2024Allow2820YesNo
17534283STORAGE DEVICES INCLUDING A CONTROLLER FOR HANDLING COMMAND SEQUENCES AND METHODS OF OPERATING THE SAMENovember 2021April 2024Allow2920YesNo
17528030SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR WORKLOAD DISTRIBUTION ACROSS PROCESSING UNITSNovember 2021February 2025Allow3930YesNo
17516915SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SRAM LESS ELECTRONIC DEVICE BOOTUP USING CACHENovember 2021March 2025Allow4150YesNo
17450124CACHE OPERATIONS IN A HYBRID DUAL IN-LINE MEMORY MODULEOctober 2021September 2022Allow1100NoNo
17491058STACKED COMMAND QUEUESeptember 2021May 2024Allow3140YesNo
17486970APPENDING DATA TO A TAPE CARTRIDGE DURING RECALL OPERATIONSSeptember 2021August 2023Allow2210YesNo
17478000RECALLING FILES FROM TAPESeptember 2021January 2023Allow1610YesNo
17478040Programmable Memory Controller Circuits And MethodsSeptember 2021May 2025Allow4420NoNo
17468880MEMORY SYSTEM IN WHICH INFORMATION ON A TIME IN WHICH INTEGRITY OF A STORED DATA PIECE IS CONFIRMED LASTSeptember 2021July 2023Allow2220NoNo
17465237HASH FUNCTION WITH PRE-SCRAMBLERSeptember 2021January 2024Allow2820YesNo
17464576MEMORY CHANNEL CONTROLLER OPERATION BASED ON DATA TYPESSeptember 2021December 2023Allow2710YesNo
17407396QOS TRAFFIC CLASS LATENCY MODEL FOR JUST-IN-TIME (JIT) SCHEDULERSAugust 2021January 2024Abandon2940YesNo
17407927MEMORY ACCESS CONTROL USING A RESIDENT CONTROL CIRCUITRY IN A MEMORY DEVICEAugust 2021June 2023Allow2210YesNo
17394709IN-LINE DATA FLOW FOR COMPUTATIONAL STORAGEAugust 2021January 2023Allow1810YesNo
17394018Pseudo-First In, First Out (FIFO) Tag Line ReplacementAugust 2021July 2022Allow1110NoNo
17384382PREPOPULATING PAGE TABLES FOR MEMORY OF WORKLOADS DURING LIVE MIGRATIONSJuly 2021December 2022Allow1610YesNo
17375159NUMA-AWARE GARBAGE COLLECTIONJuly 2021May 2023Allow2200NoNo
17375328OPERATING METHOD OF HOST DEVICE AND STORAGE DEVICE USING CREDITJuly 2021October 2022Allow1510YesNo
17375872ARRAY ACCESS WITH RECEIVER MASKINGJuly 2021September 2023Allow2720YesNo
17358367SYSTEM, DEVICE AND METHOD FOR WRITING DATA TO PROTECTED REGIONJune 2021March 2023Allow2020YesNo
17358861Cache with Set Associativity Having Data Defined Cache SetsJune 2021March 2022Allow900YesNo
17357004Efficient Handling of Background Operations for Improving Sustained Performance of Host Reads and WritesJune 2021May 2023Allow2230YesNo
17304450HOST ACCESS TRACKING IN A MEMORY SUB-SYSTEMJune 2021December 2023Abandon3040YesNo
17303674DYNAMIC PERMISSION MANAGEMENT OF STORAGE BLOCKSJune 2021October 2023Allow2950YesNo
17323628COMMAND SCHEDULING IN A MEMORY SUBSYSTEM ACCORDING TO A SELECTED SCHEDULING ORDERINGMay 2021September 2022Allow1610YesNo
17322822ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-BASED HYBRID RAID CONTROLLER DEVICEMay 2021September 2024Abandon4050YesNo
17314476MEMORY DEVICE FOR PERFORMING IN-MEMORY PROCESSINGMay 2021May 2024Allow3750YesNo
17313685MEMORY SYSTEM AND MEMORY SYSTEM DISCARD METHODMay 2021August 2022Allow1610NoNo
17237165COMBINED ON-PACKAGE AND OFF-PACKAGE MEMORY SYSTEMApril 2021August 2023Allow2750YesNo
17232888Command Queue Order Adjustment in a Data Storage DeviceApril 2021January 2024Allow3350YesNo
17222048METHOD AND APPARATUS TO REDUCE NAND DIE COLLISIONS IN A SOLID STATE DRIVEApril 2021November 2025Abandon5540NoNo
17170781ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ELECTRONIC DEVICEFebruary 2021February 2023Abandon2410NoNo
17161518FREE SPACE MANAGEMENT IN A BLOCK STOREJanuary 2021November 2022Allow2110YesNo
17156677INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD TO CONTROL MEMORY ACCESS AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM HAVING STORED THEREIN CONTROL PROGRAM TO CONTROL MEMORY ACCESSJanuary 2021October 2022Allow2120NoNo
17152115SYSTEM AND METHOD OF UTILIZING MEMORY MEDIUM FAULT RESILIENCY WITH SECURE MEMORY MEDIUM PORTIONSJanuary 2021September 2023Allow3240YesNo
17133503ADDRESS TRANSLATION TECHNOLOGIESDecember 2020December 2024Abandon4820YesNo
17103129EXTENDING SSD LONGEVITYNovember 2020March 2022Allow1620NoNo
17054083INTERLEAVED DATA CONVERSION TO CHANGE DATA FORMATSNovember 2020October 2023Allow3510YesNo
17033212SCALABLE REGION-BASED DIRECTORYSeptember 2020July 2022Allow2210YesNo
17016229Reducing Translation Lookaside Buffer Searches for Splintered PagesSeptember 2020November 2022Allow2610NoNo
16991075DETERMINING PAGE SIZE VIA PAGE TABLE CACHEAugust 2020May 2022Allow2120YesNo
16989245FLEXIBLE DEPROVISIONING OF DISTRIBUTED STORAGEAugust 2020September 2021Allow1300YesNo
16985328HASH TABLES IN FLASH MEMORYAugust 2020August 2021Allow1300YesNo
16933183Upgrading On-Disk Format Without Service InterruptionJuly 2020May 2024Abandon4660YesNo
16925185BOUNDED LATENCY AND COMMAND NON SERVICE METHODS AND APPARATUSJuly 2020September 2021Allow1400YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HO, AARON D.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
3
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
3
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
92.5%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
7
Allowed After Appeal Filing
4
(57.1%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
3
(42.9%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
87.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 57.1% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner HO, AARON D - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HO, AARON D works in Art Unit 2139 and has examined 231 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 74.0%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HO, AARON D's allowance rate of 74.0% places them in the 38% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HO, AARON D receive 2.32 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 66% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HO, AARON D is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.6% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HO, AARON D. This interview benefit is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 18.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 30.3% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 16.7% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 26.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 10.5% of allowed cases (in the 89% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

    Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

    • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
    • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
    • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
    • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
    • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
    • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

    Important Disclaimer

    Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

    No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

    Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

    Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.