USPTO Examiner CARDWELL ERIC - Art Unit 2139

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18960366MEMORY DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MONITORING THE PERFORMANCES OF A MEMORY DEVICENovember 2024January 2026Allow1410NoNo
18915945DEALLOCATION OF A MEMORY DEVICE WITH A SEGMENTED MAPPING TABLEOctober 2024January 2026Allow1610YesNo
18892339HOSTS AND OPERATION METHODS THEREOF, MEMORY SYSTEMS AND OPERATION METHODS THEREOF, AND ELECTRONIC APPARATUSSeptember 2024March 2026Allow1810NoNo
18889766Page Status Management Method and Related DeviceSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
18886679INPUT/OUTPUT OPERATIONS PER SECOND (IOPS) RECOMMENDATION FOR DATA VOLUMESSeptember 2024January 2026Allow1610NoNo
18830460METHOD OF PERFORMING COPYBACK OPERATION IN NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE, AND NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND STORAGE DEVICE PERFORMING THE SAMESeptember 2024September 2025Allow1200NoNo
18817040Pipeline Optimization In Low Power Mode Using PMRAugust 2024August 2025Allow1200NoNo
18812256GLOBAL DE-DUPLICATION OF VIRTUAL DISKS IN A STORAGE PLATFORMAugust 2024November 2025Allow1510NoNo
18780361READ AMPLIFICATION REDUCTION IN A VIRTUAL STORAGE SYSTEM WHEN COMPRESSION IS ENABLED FOR A ZONED CHECKSUM SCHEMEJuly 2024October 2025Allow1510NoNo
18775754PREEMPTIVELY WARNING HOST OF BACKGROUND FOLDINGJuly 2024June 2025Allow1100NoNo
18723892DATA READ-WRITE CONTROL METHOD AND ELECTRONIC DEVICEJune 2024August 2025Allow1410YesNo
18731352MEMORY MANAGEMENT METHOD, MEMORY STORAGE DEVICE AND MEMORY CONTROL CIRCUIT UNITJune 2024March 2026Allow2120NoNo
18670243IN-SITU MEMORY COMPRESSIONMay 2024December 2025Allow1910YesNo
18663319HIGH CAPACITY, HIGH PERFORMANCE MEMORY SYSTEMMay 2024December 2024Allow700NoNo
18639536TECHNIQUES FOR OPERATING HYBRID BLOCKS IN A MEMORY DEVICEApril 2024January 2026Allow2120NoNo
18630776SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COLLECTING TRACE DATA VIA A MEMORY DEVICEApril 2024December 2025Allow2020YesNo
18627546Maintaining Multiple Redundancy Schemes Across Different Storage TypesApril 2024February 2025Allow1110NoNo
18608880STORAGE SYSTEMMarch 2024April 2025Allow1300NoNo
18588129STORAGE SYSTEM FOR REMOTE COPY AND PATH SELECTION METHOD FOR REMOTE COPYFebruary 2024November 2025Allow2110NoNo
18588808THREADING OF REPLICATION BASED ON DATA TYPEFebruary 2024September 2024Allow700YesNo
18441343Efficient Sequential Write Gap ProcessingFebruary 2024December 2025Allow2210YesNo
18431263PREVENTING DATA LOSS IN A FILESYSTEM BY CREATING DUPLICATES OF DATA IN PARALLEL, SUCH AS CHARGING DATA IN A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKFebruary 2024November 2024Allow910NoNo
18421744FAILURE RECOVERY OF SOLID STATE DISK (SSD) STORAGE FOR CLUSTER FILE SYSTEM SERVICEABILITYJanuary 2024April 2025Allow1510NoNo
18416801MEMORY SYSTEM, METHOD AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCTSJanuary 2024September 2025Abandon2010NoNo
18414915MEMORY MODULE INCLUDING STORAGE DEVICES AND COMPUTING SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAMEJanuary 2024March 2026Allow2530YesNo
18402306MANAGING ALLOCATION OF SUB-BLOCKS IN A MEMORY SUB-SYSTEMJanuary 2024September 2025Allow2020YesNo
18395222FOLDING OPERATIONS FOR IMPROVED SEQUENTIAL READ PERFORMANCEDecember 2023March 2026Allow2720NoNo
18526520MANAGING STORAGE EXTENTS USING WEAR LEVELSDecember 2023May 2025Allow1810YesNo
18519587METHODS FOR RESTRICTING READ ACCESS TO SUPPLY CHIPSNovember 2023December 2024Abandon1310NoNo
18517307STORAGE DEVICE AND DATA ACCESS METHOD THEREOFNovember 2023January 2025Allow1410YesNo
18511670METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR IMPLEMENTING STREAM DATA UPDATESNovember 2023August 2025Allow2120YesNo
18383239METHOD AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM AND APPARATUS FOR EXECUTING HOST WRITE COMMANDSOctober 2023February 2025Allow1610NoNo
18487426TASK ADJUSTMENT FOR UNIFORM PERFORMANCE OF DRIVESOctober 2023February 2025Allow1610YesNo
18375563DATA MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR SOLID STATE STORAGE DEVICEOctober 2023September 2024Allow1200NoNo
18368292MEMORY SYSTEM HAVING PLANES WITH MULTIBIT STATUSSeptember 2023December 2024Allow1500NoNo
18238283STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD USING MULTIPLE MAP TABLESAugust 2023September 2025Allow2521YesNo
18237296METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DATA CONSISTENCY ACROSS FAILURE AND RECOVERY OF INFRASTRUCTUREAugust 2023June 2025Allow2230YesNo
18452310TRANSLATION SUPPORT FOR A VIRTUAL CACHEAugust 2023September 2024Allow1220YesNo
18276212IO PATH DETERMINATION METHOD AND APPARATUS, DEVICE AND READABLE STORAGE MEDIUMAugust 2023March 2024Allow710NoNo
18229311STORAGE DEVICE POOL MANAGEMENT BASED ON STORAGE DEVICE QUEUE USAGEAugust 2023January 2025Allow1710YesNo
18273141Method and System for Distributed LVMJuly 2023August 2025Allow2520NoNo
18355124EFFICIENT CONSOLIDATION FOR TWO LAYER FTLJuly 2023August 2025Allow2410YesNo
18216098LOCALITY-BASED DATA PROCESSINGJune 2023March 2025Allow2120YesNo
18259050VEHICLE-MOUNTED COMPUTER, COMPUTER EXECUTION METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAMJune 2023February 2026Allow3210YesNo
18337441INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUMJune 2023November 2025Abandon2940NoNo
18205448GLOBAL DE-DUPLICATION OF VIRTUAL DISKS IN A STORAGE PLATFORMJune 2023May 2024Allow1210NoNo
18322798MEMORY DEVICE AND SCHEDULING METHOD THEREOFMay 2023November 2024Allow1810YesNo
18321526ORCHESTRATION OF QUBO JOBS BETWEEN GATE-BASED QUANTUM COMPUTERS AND QUANTUM ANNEALERSMay 2023January 2026Allow3210NoNo
18037631VIRTUAL INDEXING IN A MEMORY DEVICEMay 2023September 2024Allow1600NoNo
18139236SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MEMORY REPRESENTATION AND TRACKINGApril 2023May 2025Allow2520YesNo
18297006VALID NODE MANAGEMENT METHOD, MEMORY STORAGE DEVICE AND MEMORY CONTROL CIRCUIT UNITApril 2023August 2024Allow1710NoNo
18128244CONTROL METHOD OF MEMORY DEVICE AND ASSOCIATED FLASH MEMORY CONTROLLERMarch 2023January 2026Allow3340NoNo
18192237SYSTEM-ON-CHIP INCORPORATING A DIRECT MEMORY ACCESS CIRCUIT AND CORRESPONDING METHODMarch 2023March 2025Allow2410NoNo
18186799Tiering Valid Data after a Disaster Recovery OperationMarch 2023July 2025Allow2860YesNo
18121231HIGH CAPACITY, HIGH PERFORMANCE MEMORY SYSTEMMarch 2023February 2024Allow1110NoNo
18175232Utilizing Multiple Redundancy Schemes Within A Unified Storage ElementFebruary 2023December 2023Allow1010YesNo
18172562MEMORY SYSTEMFebruary 2023June 2025Allow2810NoNo
18166834Synchronous Replication Of High Throughput Streaming DataFebruary 2023February 2025Allow2440NoNo
18159394JUST-IN-TIME FILESYSTEM-BASED RANSOMWARE BACKUPJanuary 2023April 2025Allow2630NoNo
18158957MAINTAINING THE BENEFIT OF PARALLEL SPLITTING OF OPS BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STORAGE CLUSTERS IN SYNCHRONOUS REPLICATION WHILE ADDING SUPPORT FOR OP LOGGING AND EARLY ENGAGEMENT OF OP LOGGINGJanuary 2023August 2023Allow700NoNo
18158947MAINTAINING THE BENEFIT OF PARALLEL SPLITTING OF OPS BETWEEN PRIMARY AND SECONDARY STORAGE CLUSTERS IN SYNCHRONOUS REPLICATION WHILE ADDING SUPPORT FOR OP LOGGING AND EARLY ENGAGEMENT OF OP LOGGINGJanuary 2023June 2023Allow520YesNo
18148784OPERATING METHODS, MEMORY CONTROLLERS, AND MEMORY SYSTEMSDecember 2022May 2025Allow2810YesNo
18146715Protocol Agnostic Control of NAND FlashDecember 2022March 2025Allow2620YesNo
18069725REPLICATING STORAGE DATA AND METADATA IN SEPARATE STORAGE LAYERS OF A DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEMDecember 2022August 2024Allow2010YesNo
18077534THREADING OF REPLICATION BASED ON DATA TYPEDecember 2022December 2023Allow1210NoNo
18075890ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR EMULATING EEPROM AND METHOD OF OPERATING THE SAMEDecember 2022August 2024Allow2010YesNo
18073971METHOD AND DEVICE WITH MEMORY ACCESS REQUEST PROCESSINGDecember 2022April 2025Allow2820YesNo
18072136Method And System For Automated Orchestration Of Container Application Backup For Container-Based EcosystemsNovember 2022May 2024Allow1720YesNo
17987345METHODS FOR RESTRICTING READ ACCESS TO SUPPLY CHIPSNovember 2022November 2023Abandon1210NoNo
17984536REMOTELY REPLICATING DUPLICATED DATANovember 2022July 2023Allow810YesNo
17983455STORAGE DEVICE AND OPERATING METHODNovember 2022March 2025Allow2810YesNo
17969875MULTIPLE-INSTANCE WRITE CACHE FOR A STORAGE SYSTEMOctober 2022August 2024Allow2210YesNo
17966450CONFIGURABLE FLASH MEMORY PHYSICAL INTERFACE IN A HOST DEVICEOctober 2022April 2024Allow1810NoNo
17964514SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR REVISING PERMANENT ROM-BASED PROGRAMMINGOctober 2022April 2024Allow1920NoNo
17957358APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR THROTTLING PREFETCHERS TO PREVENT TRAINING ON IRREGULAR MEMORY ACCESSESSeptember 2022July 2024Allow2220YesNo
17929962WRITE BOOSTER PINNINGSeptember 2022April 2025Allow3111NoNo
17899547MEMORY SYSTEM AND INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEMAugust 2022April 2024Allow2000NoNo
17891150MEMORY CONTROLLER AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING ACCESS TO A MEMORY MODULEAugust 2022December 2023Allow1600NoNo
17887258WRITE QUALITY IN MEMORY SYSTEMSAugust 2022June 2025Allow3421NoNo
17887366MEMORY SUB-SYSTEM TRANSFER QUEUE RETENTIONAugust 2022March 2025Allow3120YesNo
17878589Managing Overwrite Data Within Solid State DrivesAugust 2022August 2023Allow1210YesNo
17866312Network-Ready Storage Products with Cryptography based Access ControlJuly 2022March 2025Allow3240NoNo
17851595STORAGE DEVICE POOL MANAGEMENT BASED ON FRAGMENTATION LEVELSJune 2022February 2024Allow2010YesNo
17844559SOLID-STATE DRIVE WITH INITIATOR MODEJune 2022December 2022Allow600NoNo
17840512STORAGE SYSTEMJune 2022August 2023Allow1420YesNo
17777868CONTROLLER, MEMORY SYSTEM, AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING MEMORYMay 2022February 2024Allow2100NoNo
17732854DATA PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUSApril 2022November 2024Abandon3120NoNo
17731628STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING A CONTROLLER CONFIGURED TO DETERMINE IF USER DATA IS COLD DATA BASED ON A RECLAIM COUNTApril 2022January 2025Allow3330YesNo
17730288HOST PATH SELECTION UTILIZING ADDRESS RANGE DISTRIBUTION OBTAINED FROM STORAGE NODES FOR DISTRIBUTED LOGICAL VOLUMEApril 2022February 2024Allow2220NoNo
17725874TECHNIQUES FOR CREATING IDENTICAL SNAPSHOTS ON SYSTEMS DURING SYNCHRONOUS REPLICATIONApril 2022March 2024Allow2310NoNo
17708271READ AMPLIFICATION REDUCTION IN A VIRTUAL STORAGE SYSTEM WHEN COMPRESSION IS ENABLED FOR A ZONED CHECKSUM SCHEMEMarch 2022November 2023Allow2010YesNo
17707077GLOBAL DE-DUPLICATION OF VIRTUAL DISKS IN A STORAGE PLATFORMMarch 2022January 2023Allow1010NoNo
17705426CROSS-PLATFORM REPLICATION OF LOGICAL UNITSMarch 2022March 2024Allow2310YesNo
17653556COPY FROM LTFS TO DISKMarch 2022December 2023Allow2120NoNo
17684436MIGRATION OF VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING INSTANCE WITH MULTIPLE DISK CHAINS IN VIRTUALIZED COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTMarch 2022June 2023Allow1500NoNo
17684496STORAGE SYSTEM CONTROL METHOD AND STORAGE SYSTEMMarch 2022February 2024Abandon2420NoNo
17653035MEMORY SYSTEMMarch 2022January 2024Allow2210YesNo
17680185Host Defined Zone Group Configuration At A Memory Sub-SystemFebruary 2022May 2024Allow2720YesNo
17678459USING INCOMPLETE SUPER BLOCKS FOR INCREASED WRITE PERFORMANCEFebruary 2022July 2023Allow1700NoNo
17673510PREVENTING DATA LOSS IN A FILESYSTEM BY CREATING DUPLICATES OF DATA IN PARALLEL, SUCH AS CHARGING DATA IN A WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS NETWORKFebruary 2022November 2023Allow2110NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner CARDWELL, ERIC.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
7
Examiner Affirmed
6
(85.7%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(14.3%)
Reversal Percentile
25.8%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 14.3% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is below the USPTO average, indicating that appeals face more challenges here than typical.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
10
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(20.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(80.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
24.9%
Lower than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 20.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.

Examiner CARDWELL, ERIC - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CARDWELL, ERIC works in Art Unit 2139 and has examined 161 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 91.9%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 23 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CARDWELL, ERIC's allowance rate of 91.9% places them in the 77% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CARDWELL, ERIC receive 2.02 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 52% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CARDWELL, ERIC is 23 months. This places the examiner in the 85% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +3.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by CARDWELL, ERIC. This interview benefit is in the 25% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 31.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 62% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 52.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 78% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 36.4% of appeals filed. This is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 36.4% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 24% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 1.9% of allowed cases (in the 74% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments more often than average to place applications in condition for allowance (MPEP § 1302.04).

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 11% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.