Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19260222 | MEMORY ACCESS DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOF | July 2025 | February 2026 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18928526 | STORAGE DEVICE WITH ERASE UNIT LEVEL ADDRESS MAPPING | October 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18925984 | Pattern Match Prefetcher with Supplemental Program-Counter-Based Learning | October 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 13 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18911509 | METHOD, DEVICE, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PERFORMING FILE SYSTEM CHECK | October 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18903011 | Remote memory cache replacement | October 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18814197 | CACHE BASED MEMORY ACCESS TRACKING | August 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18808590 | MEMORY DEVICE, MEMORY SYSTEM, AND PROGRAM OPERATION METHOD THEREOF | August 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18806549 | TECHNIQUES FOR STORING DATA AND TAGS IN DIFFERENT MEMORY ARRAYS | August 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18792843 | ACTIVATE INFORMATION ON PRECEDING COMMAND | August 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18788695 | MEMORY STORAGE WITH SELECTED PERFORMANCE MODE | July 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18781185 | CACHING TECHNIQUES USING A MAPPING CACHE AND MAINTAINING CACHE COHERENCY USING PHYSICAL TO LOGICAL ADDRESS MAPPING | July 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18779137 | STORAGE DEVICE AND STORAGE SYSTEM INCLUDING THE SAME | July 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18768493 | DYNAMIC CACHE SLOT PRE-ALLOCATION | July 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18761148 | Charge Domain Compute-in-DRAM for Binary Neural Network | July 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18747414 | STORE-TO-LOAD FORWARDING FOR PROCESSOR PIPELINES | June 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 16 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18734006 | COHERENT HIERARCHICAL CACHE LINE TRACKING | June 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18670523 | MEMORY SYSTEM WITH CONTENT-ADDRESSABLE ENTRIES SUPPORTING SCALABLE, LOW OVERHEAD, IN-FLIGHT ESTABLISHMENT AND RETIREMENT OF RESOURCE-BASED LINKED LISTS, AND RELATED METHODS AND COMPUTER-READABLE MEDIA | May 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18640166 | Data Storage Device and Method for Data Processing Optimization for Computational Storage | April 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18634643 | DATA TRANSFER TECHNIQUE | April 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18590721 | MNAND FIELD TO PREDICT DEVICE PERFORMANCE | February 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18441775 | APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR SETTINGS FOR ADJUSTABLE WRITE TIMING | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18431544 | BUFFER EXPANSION FOR RANDOM WRITE OPERATIONS | February 2024 | September 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18408322 | PRIORITY-BASED CACHE EVICTION POLICY GOVERNED BY LATENCY CRITICAL CENTRAL PROCESSING UNIT (CPU) CORES | January 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 24 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18032392 | NETWORK NODES AND METHODS THEREIN FOR PROVIDING BACKUP NETWORK FUNCTION | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18145332 | Selective Memory Duplication Control | December 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18078487 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | December 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18058840 | CONFIDENTIAL TUNING OF PRE-TRAINED MACHINE LEARNING MODELS | November 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17974857 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, INPUT CONTROL METHOD AND PROGRAM | October 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17734994 | DYNAMICALY ADJUSTED CACHE POLICY AND COMPRESSION SCHEME FOR GRAPHS PROCESSED BY GRAPH NEURAL NETWORKS | May 2022 | June 2025 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 17707010 | CACHE LINE INVALIDATION TECHNOLOGIES | March 2022 | March 2026 | Allow | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17550998 | Automated Participation of Solid State Drives in Activities Involving Proof of Space | December 2021 | November 2025 | Allow | 47 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17316050 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TRANSFORMING LARGE DATA INTO A SMALLER REPRESENTATION AND FOR RE-TRANSFORMING THE SMALLER REPRESENTATION BACK TO THE ORIGINAL LARGE DATA | May 2021 | July 2023 | Abandon | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16599355 | INITIALIZING A DATA STRUCTURE FOR USE IN PREDICTING TABLE OF CONTENTS POINTER VALUES | October 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16542830 | SET TABLE OF CONTENTS (TOC) REGISTER INSTRUCTION | August 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16512237 | FAST LOCATE USING IMITATION READS ON TAPE DRIVES | July 2019 | April 2021 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 16370919 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REPLACEMENT IN ASSOCIATIVE MEMORIES USING WEIGHTED PLRU TREES | March 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16203775 | DYNAMIC WRITE CREDIT BUFFER MANAGEMENT OF NON-VOLATILE DUAL INLINE MEMORY MODULE | November 2018 | September 2020 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16058816 | CONSIDERATION OF CONFIGURATION-BASED INPUT/OUTPUT PREDICTIONS IN MULTI-TIERED DATA STORAGE SYSTEM MANAGEMENT | August 2018 | February 2020 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15942686 | POWER SAVINGS IN COLD STORAGE | April 2018 | October 2018 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15921375 | Storage System and Method for Determining Ecosystem Bottlenecks and Suggesting Improvements | March 2018 | July 2021 | Allow | 40 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15894797 | REDUCING DEFRAGMENTATION IN A MULTI-GRAINED WRITEBACK CACHE | February 2018 | December 2019 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15829706 | REDUCING A RATE AT WHICH DATA IS MIRRORED FROM A PRIMARY SERVER TO A SECONDARY SERVER | December 2017 | September 2019 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15823877 | IDENTIFYING ADDITIONAL RESOURCES TO ACCELERATE REBUILDLING | November 2017 | February 2020 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15824410 | FAST LOCATE USING IMITATION READS ON TAPE DRIVES | November 2017 | May 2019 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15814646 | DRAM Bank Activation Management | November 2017 | July 2019 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15400973 | DEMOTE INSTRUCTION FOR RELINQUISHING CACHE LINE OWNERSHIP | January 2017 | November 2017 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15394271 | NMONITOR INSTRUCTION FOR MONITORING A PLURALITY OF ADDRESSES | December 2016 | December 2018 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15393998 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PAGE MANAGEMENT USING LOCAL PAGE INFORMATION | December 2016 | September 2018 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15175465 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING CONTENT VARIATIONS IN CONTENT DELIVERY CACHE | June 2016 | April 2017 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 15146803 | METHOD AND DEVICE OF HEAP SORTING BASED ON A MEMORY DEVICE | May 2016 | September 2017 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15041448 | DEMOTE INSTRUCTION FOR RELINQUISHING CACHE LINE OWNERSHIP | February 2016 | June 2016 | Allow | 5 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15003214 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS | January 2016 | June 2017 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15002560 | Power Savings In Cold Storage | January 2016 | December 2017 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14924287 | METHOD FOR ACHIEVING SEQUENTIAL I/O PERFORMANCE FROM A RANDOM WORKLOAD | October 2015 | October 2016 | Allow | 12 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14919174 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR SYNCHING PORTABLE MEDIA PLAYER CONTENT WITH STORAGE SPACE OPTIMIZATION | October 2015 | August 2016 | Allow | 10 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14874511 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR TRANSFERRING MULTIPLE HIGH BANDWIDTH STREAMS OF DATA BETWEEN MULTIPLE STORAGE UNITS AND MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS IN A SCALABLE AND RELIABLE MANNER | October 2015 | April 2016 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14863590 | EFFICIENT CONFIGURATION OF MEMORY COMPONENTS | September 2015 | June 2018 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14841525 | TRANSPARENT HYBRID DATA STORAGE | August 2015 | July 2017 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14788533 | RESTORING DELETED OBJECTS IN A WEB APPLICATION | June 2015 | March 2018 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14788539 | USING INACTIVE COPY RELATIONSHIPS TO RESYNCHRONIZE DATA BETWEEN STORAGES | June 2015 | March 2017 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14788756 | STATISTIC-BASED ISOLATION OF LETHARGIC DRIVES | June 2015 | April 2017 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14661010 | PROGRAMMABLE MEMORY MAPPING SCHEME WITH INTERLEAVE PROPERTIES | March 2015 | October 2016 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14639442 | PROCESSING DATA STORAGE COMMANDS FOR ENCLOSURE SERVICES | March 2015 | March 2017 | Allow | 24 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14477227 | STORAGE CONTROL DEVICE AND STORAGE CONTROL METHOD | September 2014 | August 2017 | Allow | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14477728 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR MANAGING PAGE VARIATIONS IN A PAGE DELIVERY CACHE | September 2014 | February 2015 | Allow | 6 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14447082 | EVENT-DRIVEN INVALIDATION OF PAGES FOR WEB-BASED APPLICATIONS | July 2014 | March 2015 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14302397 | UPDATING USER DEVICE CONTENT DATA USING A DISPERSED STORAGE NETWORK | June 2014 | February 2015 | Allow | 9 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14264365 | SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY CARD ACCESS APPARATUS, A COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM, AN INITIALIZATION METHOD, AND A SEMICONDUCTOR MEMORY CARD | April 2014 | December 2014 | Allow | 8 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14227593 | ALLOCATING MEMORY ADDRESS SPACE BETWEEN DIMMS USING MEMORY CONTROLLERS | March 2014 | January 2016 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14227940 | METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM TO CACHE SETS OF TAGS OF AN OFF-DIE CACHE MEMORY | March 2014 | September 2016 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14180053 | SPECULATIVE READ IN A CACHE COHERENT MICROPROCESSOR | February 2014 | September 2014 | Allow | 7 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14170205 | Moving Checkpoint-Based High-Availability Log and Data Directly From a Producer Cache to a Consumer Cache | January 2014 | November 2015 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14119770 | COMPUTER AND COMPUTER CONTROL METHOD | November 2013 | June 2015 | Allow | 18 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 14051067 | CHIP STACK CACHE EXTENSION WITH COHERENCY | October 2013 | September 2015 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14110786 | SEMICONDUCTOR INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR OPERATING SAME | October 2013 | February 2016 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 14048474 | Techniques for Moving Checkpoint-Based High-Availability Log and Data Directly From a Producer Cache to a Consumer Cache | October 2013 | November 2015 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14035349 | COHERENT ATTACHED PROCESSOR PROXY HAVING HYBRID DIRECTORY | September 2013 | July 2015 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13932225 | COMPUTER SYSTEM AND PROCESS FOR TRANSFERRING MULTIPLE HIGH BANDWIDTH STREAMS OF DATA BETWEEN MULTIPLE STORAGE UNITS AND MULTIPLE APPLICATIONS IN A SCALABLE AND RELIABLE MANNER | July 2013 | January 2015 | Allow | 19 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13996525 | GENERATION OF FAR MEMORY ACCESS SIGNALS BASED ON USAGE STATISTIC TRACKING | June 2013 | June 2016 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13996012 | SHORT CIRCUIT OF PROBES IN A CHAIN | June 2013 | July 2015 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13996438 | EFFICIENT LOCKING OF MEMORY PAGES | June 2013 | November 2015 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13921844 | COHERENT ATTACHED PROCESSOR PROXY HAVING HYBRID DIRECTORY | June 2013 | July 2015 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13866358 | PATCH MECHANISM IN EMBEDDED CONTROLLER FOR MEMORY ACCESS | April 2013 | July 2020 | Allow | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13760144 | Performance Improvement in Flash Memory Accesses | February 2013 | September 2014 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13730223 | DISPERSED STORAGE UNIT AND METHOD FOR CONFIGURATION THEREOF | December 2012 | January 2015 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13610834 | METHOD OF REDUCING SYSTEM POWER WITH MIXED CELL MEMORY ARRAY | September 2012 | May 2015 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13401022 | METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR REUSING SNOOP RESPONSES AND DATA PHASE RESULTS IN A BUS CONTROLLER | February 2012 | September 2014 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13400212 | LOW ACCESS TIME INDIRECT MEMORY ACCESSES | February 2012 | August 2014 | Allow | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12111997 | SYSTEM AND STORAGE MEDIUM FOR MEMORY MANAGEMENT | April 2008 | April 2010 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 12029304 | STRATEGIES FOR READING INFORMATION FROM A MASS STORAGE MEDIUM USING A CACHE MEMORY | February 2008 | March 2010 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11875407 | DIRECT DEPOSIT USING LOCKING CACHE | October 2007 | May 2009 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11874513 | MECHANISM FOR A PROCESSOR TO USE LOCKING CACHE AS PART OF SYSTEM MEMORY | October 2007 | May 2009 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 11849548 | HANDLING OF THE TRANSMIT ENABLE SIGNAL IN A DYNAMIC RANDOM ACCESS MEMORY CONTROLLER | September 2007 | June 2009 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11680695 | DATA BUS BANDWIDTH SCHEDULING IN AN FBDIMM MEMORY SYSTEM OPERATING IN VARIABLE LATENCY MODE | March 2007 | September 2009 | Allow | 31 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 11680751 | MEMORY COMMAND AND ADDRESS CONVERSION BETWEEN AN XDR INTERFACE AND A DOUBLE DATA RATE INTERFACE | March 2007 | February 2010 | Allow | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 11599222 | METHOD OF CONTROLLING STORAGE DEVICE CONTROLLING APPARATUS, AND STORAGE DEVICE CONTROLLING APPARATUS | November 2006 | April 2009 | Allow | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11530936 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR MAGNETIC HEAD CONTROL IN STORAGE ACCESSES | September 2006 | June 2009 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11159288 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD | June 2005 | March 2008 | Allow | 33 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11116756 | HIGH-SPEED LOW-POWER CAM-BASED SEARCH ENGINE | April 2005 | October 2008 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 11090343 | MEMORY SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TWO STEP MEMORY WRITE OPERATIONS | March 2005 | January 2006 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner BATAILLE, PIERRE MICHE.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner BATAILLE, PIERRE MICHE works in Art Unit 2138 and has examined 87 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 98.9%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 24 months.
Examiner BATAILLE, PIERRE MICHE's allowance rate of 98.9% places them in the 92% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BATAILLE, PIERRE MICHE receive 1.70 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BATAILLE, PIERRE MICHE is 24 months. This places the examiner in the 82% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +1.4% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BATAILLE, PIERRE MICHE. This interview benefit is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 37.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 85% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 68.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 100.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 66.7% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 72% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 4.6% of allowed cases (in the 85% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 2.3% of allowed cases (in the 70% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.