Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18816756 | PADDING DATA FOR A NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE | August 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18544144 | BUFFERING DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF | December 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 21 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18534192 | STORAGE DEVICE, OPERATION METHOD OF STORAGE DEVICE, AND OPERATION METHOD OF HOST DEVICE | December 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18530915 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DATA SERVER CHANGE MANAGEMENT | December 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18530074 | Universal Flash Storage Shared Write Booster Buffer Enhancements | December 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 24 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18522403 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DEALLOCATING DYNAMICALLY ALLOCATED MEMORY AREA | November 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18513198 | STRUCTURED DATA FILTERING IN MEMORY DEVICES | November 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18510608 | SERVICE LIFETIME MONITORING AND EARLY WARNING METHOD, MEMORY STORAGE DEVICE AND MEMORY CONTROL CIRCUIT UNIT | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18502147 | SOLID-STATE DISKS WEAR LEVELING WITH PREDICTIVE MIGRATION OF DATA DEVICES IN A RAID CONTAINER SYSTEM | November 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 21 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18488426 | Write Protect HW Acceleration | October 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 20 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18461261 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INDEXING A DATA ITEM IN A DATA STORAGE SYSTEM | September 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 22 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18238301 | STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING NONVOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND OPERATING METHOD OF STORAGE DEVICE | August 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 30 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18237033 | EFFICIENT USAGE OF REDUNDANT COLUMNS IN FLASH MEMORY | August 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 18235678 | NON-VOLATILE MEMORY DEVICE AND STORAGE DEVICE | August 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 25 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18364277 | UNMAPPING A WRITE BUFFER PORTION FOR ACCESS DURING A WRITE TO A MEMORY DEVICE | August 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 26 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 18273230 | Shared Drive Storage Stack Monitoring And Recovery Method And System | July 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 23 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18310800 | OPTIMIZING INPUT/OUTPUT OPERATIONS PER SECTION OF REMOTE PERSISTENT STORAGE | May 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18140492 | Backend Replication of Data in a Distributed Storage System | April 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18134359 | OPERATING METHOD OF MEMORY DEVICE FOR MANAGING MAP DATA OF EACH OF PLURALITY OF STORAGE DEVICES, COMPUTING SYSTEM INCLUDING MEMORY DEVICE, AND OPERATING METHOD OF COMPUTING SYSTEM | April 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 28 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18193921 | DATA REGENERATION AND STORAGE IN A RAID STORAGE SYSTEM | March 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 23 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17875198 | DATA STREAMING ACCELERATOR | July 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17711928 | SCALABLE ACCESS CONTROL CHECKING FOR CROSS-ADDRESS-SPACE DATA MOVEMENT | April 2022 | July 2025 | Allow | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17484634 | GRAPHICS PROCESSOR MEMORY ACCESS ARCHITECTURE WITH ADDRESS SORTING | September 2021 | January 2026 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner CHOWDHURY, SUBIR KUMAR works in Art Unit 2132 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 52 months.
Examiner CHOWDHURY, SUBIR KUMAR's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by CHOWDHURY, SUBIR KUMAR receive 3.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 86% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CHOWDHURY, SUBIR KUMAR is 52 months. This places the examiner in the 3% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 97% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 10% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.