USPTO Examiner WILDER CYNTHIA B - Art Unit 1681

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19306722METHOD OF RAPID EXTRACTION OF DNA FROM SALIVA AND QPCR AMPLIFICATION OF GROUP A STREPTOCOCCUS DNAAugust 2025February 2026Allow610NoNo
19212398CHROMATIN PROFILING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODSMay 2025November 2025Allow610NoNo
19172703Nucleic Acid Reporter Molecules for Massively Parallel DNA SequencingApril 2025October 2025Allow611YesNo
18559322SPATIOTEMPORALLY RESOLVED TRANSCRIPTOMICS AT SUBCELLULAR RESOLUTIONNovember 2023February 2026Allow2700NoNo
18296699FOOD CERTIFICATION SYSTEMApril 2023September 2025Allow3000NoNo
18129274METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS RELATING TO DETECTION OF RECOMBINATION AND REARRANGEMENT EVENTSMarch 2023February 2026Allow3410NoNo
18188927Multiplex Isotype-Specific Antibody DetectionMarch 2023October 2025Allow3100NoNo
18166986METHODS FOR ANALYZING NUCLEIC ACIDSFebruary 2023January 2026Allow3610YesNo
18097990METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR IMPROVED PROBE SPECIFICITYJanuary 2023March 2026Allow3810NoNo
18016290METHODS FOR THE DETECTION OF A NUCLEIC ACIDJanuary 2023January 2026Allow3610NoNo
18003456PROTECTION METHOD, PROTECTION SEQUENCE, COMPOSITION AND KIT FOR PREVENTING RNA DEGREADATION, AND USE THEREOFDecember 2022January 2026Allow3710NoNo
18047063DIRECT RNA NANOPORE SEQUENCING WITH HELP OF A STEM-LOOP REVERSE POLYNUCLEOTIDEOctober 2022July 2025Allow3300YesNo
17914815Compositions and Methods for Nucleic Acid Quality DeterminationSeptember 2022January 2026Allow4011NoNo
17952414POLYNUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCINGSeptember 2022August 2025Allow3401YesNo
17913352DNA REPAIR SITE DETECTION FOR PERSONAL GENOMICS, EPIGENOMICS, AND GENE THERAPYSeptember 2022December 2025Allow3910NoNo
17941758Automated Cell Sorting Stage and Methods For Using SameSeptember 2022September 2025Allow3610YesNo
17898112METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING TISSUE CONDITIONSAugust 2022March 2026Allow4210YesNo
17820856METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS RELATING TO COVALENTLY CLOSED NUCLEIC ACIDSAugust 2022October 2025Allow3810NoNo
17820289COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING GROUP B STREPTOCOCCUS NUCLEIC ACIDAugust 2022March 2026Allow4311NoNo
17760195Nucleic Acid Detection Kit For Novel Coronavirus 2019-nCoVAugust 2022September 2025Allow3810NoNo
17817516IN SITU READOUT OF DNA BARCODESAugust 2022September 2025Allow3711NoNo
17867393DISEASE DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEM AND METHODJuly 2022October 2025Allow3910NoNo
17793159METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR TREATING MELANOMAJuly 2022February 2026Abandon4301NoNo
17758511IMAGE DIFFERENTIATED MULTIPLEX ASSAYS FOR DETECTION OF DNA MUTATIONS IN LUNG CANCERJuly 2022August 2025Allow3801YesNo
17790490A fluorescent quantitative PCR technology-based method for distinguishing human DNAJune 2022January 2026Abandon4210NoNo
17839014LAMP PRIMER SET AND METHOD FOR AMPLIFYING NUCLEIC ACIDS USING THE SAMEJune 2022December 2025Allow4211NoNo
17715894METHODS FOR ASYMMETRIC SEMI-NESTED ISOTHERMAL NUCLEOTIDE AMPLIFICATIONApril 2022January 2026Allow4520YesNo
17642887Adapter Molecule, Biomolecule-Adapter Molecule Complex in Which Said Adapter Molecule and Biomolecule Are Bound, Biomolecule Analysis Apparatus, and Biomolecule Analysis MethodMarch 2022March 2026Allow4821YesNo
17667334METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATIONFebruary 2022November 2025Allow4510NoNo
17521350STABILIZATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS IN URINENovember 2021November 2025Allow4921YesNo
17471932METHODS AND DEVICES FOR AMPLIFICATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDSeptember 2021February 2026Abandon5310NoNo
17378267DETECTING COLORECTAL NEOPLASMJuly 2021November 2023Allow2810NoNo
17282424CRISPR EFFECTOR SYSTEM BASED DIAGNOSTICS FOR HEMORRHAGIC FEVER DETECTIONApril 2021July 2025Allow5121YesNo
17279534TUMOR HLA MUTATION VERSUS MATCHED NORMAL HLAMarch 2021September 2025Allow5431YesNo
17174799OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBE FOR THE SPECIFIC DETECTION OF MICROORGANISMS, CORRESPONDING METHOD AND USEFebruary 2021May 2025Allow5141YesNo
17048311Positionally Assisted Negative particle Rejection (PANR) to sort and enrich target cells of interestOctober 2020February 2024Allow4010NoNo
16975678MOLECULAR TARGETS FOR FETAL NUCLEIC ACID ANALYSISAugust 2020May 2025Abandon5730NoNo
16032183APPARATUS AND METHODS FOR INTEGRATED SAMPLE PREPARATION, REACTION AND DETECTIONJuly 2018January 2020Allow1810NoNo
15589392BACTERIAL PATHOGEN IDENTIFICATION BY HIGH RESOLUTION MELTING ANALYSISMay 2017November 2019Allow3021YesNo
15326604ISOTHERMAL METHODS FOR AMPLIFYING NUCLEIC ACID SAMPLESJanuary 2017June 2019Allow2910NoNo
15293387METHODS FOR MULTIPLEXING AMPLIFICATION REACTIONSOctober 2016June 2018Allow2010YesNo
15252555METHODS AND REAGENTS THAT SPECIFICALLY DETECT, DISTINGUISH AND QUANTIFY IFN-LAMBDA2 mRNA FROM IFN-LAMBDA3 mRNA IN HUMANSAugust 2016July 2018Allow2300NoNo
15250259RAPID WHOLE GENOME AMPLIFICATIONAugust 2016October 2017Allow1410NoNo
15235959RAPID SOLID PHASE EXTRACTION DEVICE AND METHODSAugust 2016August 2019Allow3611YesNo
15102685NUCLEIC ACID DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATIONJune 2016August 2019Allow3821NoNo
15156352METHODS OF DIAGNOSING BIPOLAR DISORDERS AND SCREENING FOR THERAPEUTIC COMPOUNDSMay 2016April 2019Allow3421NoNo
15085456METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR REPAIR OF DNA ENDS BY MULTIPLE ENZYMATIC ACTIVITIESMarch 2016March 2019Allow3611NoNo
14851837DETECTION OF DNA SEQUENCES AS RISK FACTORS FOR HIV INFECTIONSeptember 2015October 2018Allow3721YesNo
14774648Massively Multiplexed RNA SequencingSeptember 2015November 2019Allow5041YesNo
14841015METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR DETECTING CONTAMINATED FOOD PRODUCTSAugust 2015March 2016Allow610NoNo
14832248THERMAL CYCLER AND THERMAL CYCLE METHODAugust 2015June 2016Allow1010NoNo
14810388METHODS FOR DETECTION AND QUANTIFICATION OF NUCLEIC ACID OR PROTEIN TARGETS IN A SAMPLEJuly 2015February 2017Allow1810NoNo
14746437MULTIPLEX QUANTITATIVE PCRJune 2015December 2017Allow2911YesNo
14746272COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR IN-SYSTEM PRIMING MICROFLUIDIC DEVICESJune 2015January 2017Allow1910NoNo
14648678PRIMER MIDDLE SEQUENCE INTERFERENCE PCR TECHNOLOGYMay 2015March 2018Allow3411YesNo
14697036SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING THE AMPLIFICATION OF DNAApril 2015May 2017Allow2511YesNo
14589864METHODS FOR MULTIPLEXING AMPLIFICATION REACTIONSJanuary 2015July 2015Allow610NoNo
14498827COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE-POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (RT-PCR)September 2014September 2017Allow3530NoNo
14372692METHODS TO MUTATE CIRCULAR DEOXYRIBONUCLEOTIDESJuly 2014August 2016Allow2511YesNo
14331886METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR APPLYING CONTINUOUS FLOW AND UNIFORM TEMPERATURE TO GENERATE THERMAL MELTING CURVES IN A MICROFLUIDIC DEVICEJuly 2014October 2016Allow2720YesNo
14330707Phased Genome SequencingJuly 2014August 2015Allow1320YesNo
14172295METHOD FOR DETECTING A TARGET PARTICLEFebruary 2014February 2016Allow2420NoNo
14090167METHODS AND MATERIALS FOR DETECTING CONTAMINATED FOOD PRODUCTSNovember 2013February 2015Allow1510NoNo
14017764HUMAN EXHALED AEROSOL DROPLET BIOMARKER SYSTEM AND METHODSeptember 2013November 2016Allow3921NoNo
13960121DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINSAugust 2013February 2015Allow1920YesNo
13977411OLIGONUCLEOTIDE PROBE FOR THE DETECTION OF ADENOVIRUSJuly 2013July 2016Allow3721YesNo
13899284Ribosomal Polynucleotides and Related Expression SystemsMay 2013January 2016Allow3211YesNo
13868666DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINSApril 2013May 2014Allow1310NoNo
13880224THERMAL CYCLER AND THERMAL CYCLE METHODApril 2013May 2015Allow2510NoNo
13771700CHIMERIC DNA IDENTIFIERFebruary 2013August 2016Allow4241NoNo
13768794DETECTION OF HPVFebruary 2013February 2014Allow1210NoNo
13764754COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE-POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION (RT-PCR)February 2013January 2014Allow1242NoNo
13752003DETECTION OF DNA SEQUENCES AS RISK FACTORS FOR HIV INFECTIONJanuary 2013May 2015Allow2821YesNo
13682344SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR RAPID DETECTION AND IDENTIFICATION OF NUCLEIC ACID LABELED TAGSNovember 2012August 2015Allow3311YesNo
13681574DUAL OLIGONUCLEOTIDE METHOD OF NUCLEIC ACID DETECTIONNovember 2012September 2013Allow1001YesNo
13520383Assembly of High Fidelity PolynucleotidesOctober 2012October 2015Allow4030NoNo
13619436METHODS FOR MULTIPLEXING AMPLIFICATION REACTIONSSeptember 2012March 2014Allow1820NoNo
13505598SEQUENCE-SPECIFIC METHODS FOR HOMOGENEOUS, REAL-TIME DETECTION OF LAMP PRODUCTSJuly 2012December 2015Allow4321YesNo
13505872REACTIVITY-DEPENDENT AND INTERACTION-DEPENDENT PCRJuly 2012June 2015Allow3711NoNo
13488748Method of Manufacturing Nanoparticle ChainJune 2012August 2014Allow2710NoNo
13489209DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINSJune 2012May 2014Allow2420NoNo
13472209PRIMERS FOR ANALYZING METHYLATED SEQUENCES AND METHODS OF USE THEREOFMay 2012December 2012Allow710YesNo
13384712OLIGONUCLEOTIDES FOR DETECTING CHICKEN ASTROVIRUSFebruary 2012August 2013Allow1910NoNo
13340572SAMPLE ANALYSIS METHOD AND ASSAY KIT USED THEREINDecember 2011October 2013Allow2212YesNo
13339633RAPID WHOLE GENOME AMPLIFICATIONDecember 2011April 2016Allow5250YesNo
13379499DNA-BASED METHODS FOR CLONE-SPECIFIC IDENTIFICATION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUSDecember 2011November 2015Allow4740NoNo
13299126HIGH SPEED, HIGH FIDELITY, HIGH SENSITIVITY NUCLEIC ACID DETECTIONNovember 2011April 2013Allow1620YesNo
13297062Phased Genome SequencingNovember 2011March 2014Allow2830YesNo
13296557METHOD FOR DETERMINING PREDISPOSITION TO PULMONARY INFECTIONNovember 2011May 2015Allow4241YesNo
12305742Method for the Detection and Diagnosis of Cancer Involving Primers and Probes for the Specific Detection of the MAGE-A3-MarkerOctober 2011September 2014Allow6020NoNo
13221948COMPOSITION AND METHOD FOR IN-SYSTEM PRIMING MICROFLUIDIC DEVICESAugust 2011March 2015Allow4211YesNo
13199380Methods and compositions related thereto for detecting and identifying distinct species of nucleic acids from causative agentsAugust 2011September 2014Allow3640NoYes
13214547NUCLEIC ACID ISOTHERMAL AMPLIFICATION METHODAugust 2011September 2013Allow2520NoNo
13195116PHYSIOGENOMIC METHOD FOR PREDICTING DIABETES AND METABOLIC SYNDROMES INDUCED BY PSYCHOTROPIC DRUGSAugust 2011December 2012Allow1611NoNo
13190317PRIMERS FOR NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION IN DETECTING BETA-ACTIN AND TEST METHOD USING THESE PRIMERSJuly 2011February 2012Allow600YesNo
13135022COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING CRYPTOCOCCUS NEOFORMANSJune 2011October 2012Allow1610NoNo
13123524MICROFLUIDIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR DNA EXTRACTION, AMPLIFICATION AND ANALYSISJune 2011March 2015Allow4831YesNo
13161074DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINSJune 2011February 2013Allow2000YesNo
13098613GEL HAVING BIOSUBSTANCE FIXED THERETO AND MICROARRAY UTILIZING THE GELMay 2011April 2014Allow3540YesYes
13018553DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINSFebruary 2011March 2013Allow2520YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner WILDER, CYNTHIA B.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
22
Allowed After Appeal Filing
9
(40.9%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
13
(59.1%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
68.2%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 40.9% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner WILDER, CYNTHIA B - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner WILDER, CYNTHIA B works in Art Unit 1681 and has examined 228 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 97.8%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 36 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner WILDER, CYNTHIA B's allowance rate of 97.8% places them in the 89% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by WILDER, CYNTHIA B receive 2.39 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by WILDER, CYNTHIA B is 36 months. This places the examiner in the 35% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +1.3% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by WILDER, CYNTHIA B. This interview benefit is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 29.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 44.4% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 68% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 87% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 90.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 64.8% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 22.4% of allowed cases (in the 98% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 3.6% of allowed cases (in the 76% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.