USPTO Examiner HORLICK KENNETH R - Art Unit 1681

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
19070259METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING GENETIC VARIANTSMarch 2025April 2025Allow210NoNo
18958854SEQUENCING A TARGET SEQUENCE IN A CELLNovember 2024June 2025Allow610NoNo
18930072METHODS FOR MONITORING RESIDUAL DISEASEOctober 2024February 2025Allow1310YesNo
18900948METHOD, KIT AND SYSTEM FOR END LABELING OF NUCLEIC ACIDSSeptember 2024June 2025Allow811YesNo
18813477METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING GENETIC VARIANTSAugust 2024February 2025Allow610NoNo
18812385METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETECTING GENETIC VARIANTSAugust 2024February 2025Allow510NoNo
18776193DEVICES AND METHODS FOR ANALYZING BIOLOGICAL SAMPLESJuly 2024January 2025Allow610YesNo
18770298METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANALYZING NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULESJuly 2024March 2025Allow810NoNo
18770271METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANALYZING NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULESJuly 2024December 2024Allow510NoNo
18737828PROBE-BASED ANALYSIS OF NUCLEIC ACIDS AND PROTEINSJune 2024March 2025Abandon910NoNo
18737230SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEQUENCING ERROR CORRECTION VIA DOUBLE STRAND PRESERVATIONJune 2024September 2024Allow410NoNo
18677090SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DETECT RARE MUTATIONS AND COPY NUMBER VARIATIONMay 2024February 2025Allow910NoNo
18672154Adenosine triphosphatase sarcoplasmic/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ transporting 2 (ATP2A2) gene-based molecular marker for identifying chicken feed efficiency trait, and identification method and use thereofMay 2024March 2025Allow1010NoNo
18655106METHODS FOR PROCESSING NUCLEIC ACID SAMPLESMay 2024June 2025Abandon1320NoNo
18625882METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ANALYZING NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULESApril 2024April 2025Allow1220NoNo
18593787METHODS FOR ANALYZING BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES IN A FLUIDIC DEVICE COMPRISING GENERATING A POLYMER MATRIX FROM PRECURSORS AT SPECIFIC LOCATIONS COMPRISING BIOLOGICAL COMPONENTSMarch 2024July 2024Allow410YesNo
18426665SYSTEMS AND METHODS TO DETECT RARE MUTATIONS AND COPY NUMBER VARIATIONJanuary 2024January 2025Allow1110NoNo
18392743METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR NUCLEIC ACID ANALYSISDecember 2023April 2025Abandon1620NoNo
18569594SPATIAL ANALYSIS OF A PLANAR BIOLOGICAL SAMPLEDecember 2023December 2024Allow1210NoNo
18460755SINGLE CELL SEQUENCINGSeptember 2023February 2025Allow1710NoNo
18350601IMMUNE PROFILING USING SMALL VOLUME BLOOD SAMPLESJuly 2023July 2025Allow2410NoNo
18345676METHOD OF DETECTING AND QUANTIFYING GENOMIC AND GENE EXPRESSION ALTERATIONS USING RNAJune 2023June 2025Allow2410NoNo
18343858MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR LOCALIZED DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS IN A TISSUE SAMPLEJune 2023February 2025Allow1910NoNo
18341446METHODS, COMPOSITIONS, AND KITS FOR PREPARING NUCLEIC ACID LIBRARIESJune 2023January 2025Allow1910NoNo
18205795DIAGNOSIS OF PROSTATE CANCERJune 2023May 2025Allow2420NoNo
18320122METHODS AND ARRAYS FOR PRODUCING AND SEQUENCING MONOCLONAL CLUSTERS OF NUCLEIC ACIDMay 2023January 2025Allow2010NoNo
18313277METHODS OF LABELLING NUCLEIC ACIDS USING VARIABLE LENGTH OLIGONUCLEOTIDESMay 2023May 2025Allow2410NoNo
18142512MULTIPLEXED METHOD FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND QUANTITATION OF MINOR ALLELES AND POLYMORPHISMSMay 2023July 2025Allow2620NoNo
18303536COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR ISOLATION OF CELL-FREE DNAApril 2023October 2024Allow1810NoNo
18131675DNA SEQUENCING REACTION ADDITIVEApril 2023April 2025Abandon2410NoNo
18129747CONFORMATIONAL PROBES AND METHODS FOR SEQUENCING NUCLEIC ACIDSMarch 2023January 2025Allow2210NoNo
18125041LOADING NUCLEIC ACIDS ONTO SUBSTRATESMarch 2023November 2024Allow2010NoNo
18184928METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR SEQUENCING DOUBLE STRANDED NUCLEIC ACIDSMarch 2023June 2025Allow2720NoNo
18111791Colorimetric Detection of Nucleic Acid AmplificationFebruary 2023March 2025Allow2520NoNo
18106566PURIFICATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDS USING TITANIUM OXIDESFebruary 2023October 2024Allow2010NoNo
18164531DEVICE FOR EXTRACTING A NUCLEIC ACID FROM A SAMPLE LIQUIDFebruary 2023February 2025Allow2510NoNo
18053603ERROR CORRECTION IN AMPLIFICATION OF SAMPLESNovember 2022March 2025Allow2830NoNo
18050382SEQUENCE TAG DIRECTED SUBASSEMBLY OF SHORT SEQUENCING READS INTO LONG SEQUENCING READSOctober 2022July 2024Allow2110NoNo
18046058PRIMER EXTENSION TARGET ENRIGHMENT AND IMPROVEMENTS THERETO INCLUDING SIMULTANEOUS ENRICHMENT OF DNA AND RNAOctober 2022January 2025Allow2711NoNo
17934407METHODS OF SEQUENCING CIRCULAR TEMPLATE POLYNUCLEOTIDESSeptember 2022September 2024Allow2430NoNo
17820011METHOD OF NUCLEIC ACID ENRICHMENT USING SITE-SPECIFIC NUCLEASES FOLLOWED BY CAPTUREAugust 2022August 2024Allow2411NoNo
17819397SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING-NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULES FROM A SINGLE CELL USING SEQUENTIAL CO-PARTITIONING AND COMPOSITE BARCODESAugust 2022July 2024Allow2310NoNo
17886769TCR/BCR Profiling Using Enrichment with Pools of Capture ProbesAugust 2022May 2024Allow2210NoNo
17816662Sequencing Output Determination and Analysis with Target-Associated Molecules in Quantification Associated with Biological TargetsAugust 2022August 2024Allow2520NoNo
17828686DNA CONSTRUCT FOR SEQUENCING AND METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAMEMay 2022March 2025Allow3410YesNo
17749050SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DIFFERENTIALLY TAGGING NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULESMay 2022July 2024Allow2610NoNo
17502526METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR CAPPING NUCLEIC ACIDSOctober 2021September 2024Allow3510YesNo
17497090Methods for Categorizing and Treating Subjects Having Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and at Risk for Severe Pulmonary ExacerbationOctober 2021July 2024Allow3330NoNo
17602643COMPOSITION FOR DIAGNOSIS OR PROGNOSIS PREDICTION OF GLIOMA, AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION RELATED THERETOOctober 2021March 2025Abandon4201NoNo
17492318Systems and Methods for Rapid Nucleic Acid Extraction, Purification and Analysis from SemenOctober 2021April 2025Allow4211YesNo
17600526IMMOBILIZATION IN FLOW CELLSSeptember 2021April 2025Allow4201NoNo
17448736DETERMINING THE SEQUENCE OF A DOUBLE-STRANDED TARGET NUCLEIC ACID BY EMPLOYING A TERMINAL TRANSFERASE, FORMING A LINEAR JOINT MOLECULE, AND SEQUENCING IN ONE DIRECTIONSeptember 2021November 2024Allow3810NoNo
17483274AFFINITY-OLIGONUCLEOTIDE CONJUGATES AND USES THEREOFSeptember 2021October 2024Abandon3710NoNo
17447794METHODS FOR PREPARING A SAMPLE FOR NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION USING TAGMENTATIONSeptember 2021August 2024Allow3511YesNo
17399339METHOD FOR QUANTIFICATION OF PD-L1 EXPRESSIONAugust 2021January 2025Allow4230YesNo
17392531ISOTHERMAL METHODS FOR AMPLIFYING NUCLEIC ACID SAMPLESAugust 2021May 2025Allow4610NoNo
17392865SINGLE CELL BAR-CODING FOR ANTIBODY DISCOVERYAugust 2021May 2024Allow3411NoNo
17384635XENONUCLEIC ACID-MEDIATED MULTIPLEX QPCR CLAMPING TECHNOLOGY FOR LUNG CANCER MUTATION DETECTIONJuly 2021February 2025Abandon4320YesNo
17345011METHOD COMBINING SINGLE CELL GENE EXPRESSION MAPPING AND TARGETED RNA OR c-DNA SEQUENCING USING PADLOCK OLIGONUCLEOTIDES COMPRISING A BARCODE REGIONJune 2021August 2024Allow3820NoNo
17293578SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHARACTERIZING AND TREATING BREAST CANCERMay 2021July 2024Allow3811YesNo
17281269FULL-LENGTH RNA SEQUENCINGMarch 2021December 2024Allow4510NoNo
17217797Analytical Toilet for Detecting Viruses in UrineMarch 2021December 2024Abandon4501NoNo
17218121METHODS FOR NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCINGMarch 2021October 2024Abandon4371YesNo
17206701METHODS FOR HAPLOTYPING WITH SHORT READ SEQUENCE TECHNOLOGYMarch 2021January 2025Abandon4610NoNo
17181103METHODS AND KITS FOR EXTRACTION OF DNAFebruary 2021July 2024Allow4021NoNo
17257370Methods for Detecting and Treating a Tumorigenic Phenotype of the LiverDecember 2020May 2025Allow5321NoYes
16328141PROCESS FOR THE ENZYMATIC SYNTHESIS AND AMPLIFICATION OF NUCLEIC ACIDSFebruary 2019November 2019Allow910NoNo
16007795COLORECTAL CANCER ASSOCIATED CIRCULATING NUCLEIC ACID BIOMARKERSJune 2018March 2025Allow6031NoYes
15577093KIT FOR PREDICTING TREATMENT WITH GLUCOCORTICOIDS AND METHOD COMPRISING THE SAMENovember 2017February 2020Allow2710NoNo
15730608METHODS OF ASSAYING NUCLEIC ACIDS OF LOW QUANTITIES USING A BUFFER NUCLEIC ACIDOctober 2017February 2020Allow2811YesNo
15276912NOVEL PCR PRIMERS AND METHODS THEREOF FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF BACILLUS COAGULANSSeptember 2016January 2019Allow2820NoNo
15032983Method for Analyzing Body Fluid SamplesApril 2016October 2018Allow3010NoNo
14909840NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION DEVICE, NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION APPARATUS, AND NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION METHOD FOR TRANSPORTING REACTION SOLUTION INCLUDING TARGET NUCLEIC ACID VIA CAPILLARY FORCE TO AMPLIFY TARGET NUCLEIC ACIDFebruary 2016September 2018Allow3210NoNo
14903416DNA AMPLIFICATION VIA SCISSOR-LIKE STRUCTURES (DASL)January 2016July 2018Allow3010NoNo
14834710METHODS, COMPOSITIONS AND KITS FOR ENRICHING FOR A MINOR TEMPLATE AMPLIFICATION PRODUCT IN A MIXED TEMPLATE AMPLIFICATION REACTIONAugust 2015March 2016Allow720NoNo
14762454QUANTIFICATION METHOD FOR EXPRESSION LEVEL OF WT1 mRNAJuly 2015December 2018Allow4120YesNo
14743901METHOD OF EXTENDING DNA WITH TELOMERASE AND METHOD OF MEASURING TELOMERASE ACTIVITYJune 2015January 2019Allow4340YesNo
14679647SOYBEAN EVENT 127 AND METHODS RELATED THERETOApril 2015January 2018Allow3411NoNo
14613849METHOD FOR GENOME SEQUENCING USING A SEQUENCE-BASED PHYSICAL MAPFebruary 2015November 2015Allow910NoNo
14610915Recombinase Polymerase AmplificationJanuary 2015December 2015Allow1010NoNo
14404964ASSEMBLY AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCES BY WAY OF SO-CALLED SEQUENCING-BY-SYNTHESISDecember 2014May 2017Allow3010YesNo
14522505NUCLEIC ACID-FREE THERMOSTABLE ENZYMES AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION THEREOFOctober 2014July 2016Allow2020YesNo
14382142METHOD OF IDENTIFYING VDJ RECOMBINATION PRODUCTSAugust 2014August 2017Allow3611NoNo
14304543KIT COMPRISING PRIMERS FOR AMPLIFYING ALK KINASE DOMAIN NUCLEIC ACIDSJune 2014June 2015Allow1221YesNo
14343511A PRIMER SET FOR ISOTHERMAL AMPLICATION OF A TARGET NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE.June 2014December 2016Allow3310NoNo
14274168METHODS TO REDUCE REPEATS OF IDENTICAL NUCLEOTIDES IN COPIES OF A TARGET DNA MOLECULE INCLUDING SUCH REPEATSMay 2014March 2017Allow3411NoNo
14219931METHOD FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE CLONAL SOURCE OF A RESTRICTION FRAGMENTMarch 2014November 2014Allow820NoNo
14172793A Method for Detection of High Risk Human PapillomavirusFebruary 2014August 2016Allow3020NoNo
14062228NUCLEIC ACID EXTRACTION DEVICE, AND NUCLEIC ACID EXTRACTION METHOD, NUCLEIC ACID EXTRACTION KIT, AND NUCLEIC ACID EXTRACTION APPARATUS, EACH USING THE SAMEOctober 2013January 2016Allow2711YesNo
13948928NUCLEIC ACID-FREE THERMOSTABLE ENZYMES AND METHODS OF PRODUCTION THEREOFJuly 2013July 2014Allow1220YesNo
13922146COMPOSITIONS FOR AMPLIFICATION OF RNA SEQUENCES USING COMPOSITE PRIMERSJune 2013July 2015Allow2520NoNo
13911268COMPOSITIONS FOR RECOMBINASE POLYMERASE AMPLIFICATIONJune 2013February 2016Allow3220NoNo
13874697DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE DIFFERENCES USING COUPLED LIGASE DETECTION AND POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTIONSMay 2013March 2014Allow1110NoNo
13783601METHOD FOR THE IDENTIFICATION OF THE CLONAL SOURCE OF A RESTRICTION FRAGMENTMarch 2013November 2013Allow810NoNo
13779459METHODS FOR PREPARING AMPLIFIABLE DNA MOLECULESFebruary 2013March 2014Allow1210NoNo
13648415PRESERVATION OF CELL-FREE RNA IN BLOOD SAMPLESOctober 2012July 2013Allow910NoNo
13543432DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE DIFFERENCES USING COUPLED POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTIONSJuly 2012June 2013Allow1110NoNo
13543365DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE DIFFERENCES USING COUPLED LIGASE DETECTION AND POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTIONSJuly 2012February 2013Allow810NoNo
13523252DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID SEQUENCE DIFFERENCES USING COUPLED LIGASE DETECTION AND POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTIONSJune 2012February 2013Allow810NoNo
13505694GENOTYPING OF N LOCI IN A TARGET NUCLEIC ACID MOLECULEMay 2012January 2016Allow4411YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner HORLICK, KENNETH R.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
2
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
91.7%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
29
Allowed After Appeal Filing
10
(34.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
19
(65.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
53.7%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 34.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner HORLICK, KENNETH R - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner HORLICK, KENNETH R works in Art Unit 1681 and has examined 325 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 96.6%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 30 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner HORLICK, KENNETH R's allowance rate of 96.6% places them in the 90% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by HORLICK, KENNETH R receive 1.78 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 53% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by HORLICK, KENNETH R is 30 months. This places the examiner in the 39% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.1% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by HORLICK, KENNETH R. This interview benefit is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 33.6% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 67% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 64.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 92.6% of appeals filed. This is in the 82% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 84.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 58.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 74% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions show above-average success regarding this examiner's actions. Petitionable matters include restriction requirements (MPEP § 1002.02(c)(2)) and various procedural issues.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 24.0% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 1302.04, examiner's amendments are used to place applications in condition for allowance when only minor changes are needed. This examiner frequently uses this tool compared to other examiners, indicating a cooperative approach to getting applications allowed. Strategic Insight: If you are close to allowance but minor claim amendments are needed, this examiner may be willing to make an examiner's amendment rather than requiring another round of prosecution.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.6% of allowed cases (in the 51% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Examiner cooperation: This examiner frequently makes examiner's amendments to place applications in condition for allowance. If you are close to allowance, the examiner may help finalize the claims.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.