Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18803324 | COMPOSITION COMPRISING CELL ORIGINATION BARCODES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF BOTH GENOMIC DNA AND CDNA FROM THE SAME CELL | August 2024 | October 2024 | Allow | 2 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18542373 | SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 21240438 | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18534677 | PLANTS AND SEEDS OF HYBRID CORN VARIETY CH010492 | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18519126 | SOYBEAN VARIETY 01098329 | November 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18513379 | SOYBEAN VARIETY 01098336 | November 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18497224 | VARIETY CORN LINE TPFX7814 | October 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18493979 | MATERIALS AND METHODS FOR INHIBITING A VIRAL INFECTION, INCLUDING A CORONAVIRUS INFECTION | October 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18492628 | SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 22080703 | October 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18467021 | HYBRID TOMATO VARIETY 72-CK0621 RZ | September 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17311521 | Methods for Preparing CDNA Samples for RNA Sequencing, and CDNA Samples and Uses Thereof | June 2021 | September 2025 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 14098519 | METHODS AND KITS USING EXTENDED RHODAMINE DYES | December 2013 | July 2015 | Allow | 19 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 12466565 | PURIFIED LINEAR EPITOPES FROM CASHEW NUTS, NUCLEIC ACIDS ENDCODING THEREFOR AND ASSOCIATED METHODS | May 2009 | January 2012 | Allow | 33 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 11299124 | DNA POLYMERASES HAVING IMPROVED LABELED NUCLEOTIDE INCORPORATION PROPERTIES | December 2005 | March 2010 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 09802358 | METHOD FOR 3' END-LABELING RIBONUCLEIC ACIDS | March 2001 | November 2003 | Allow | 32 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner BENZION, GARY works in Art Unit 1681 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.
Examiner BENZION, GARY's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BENZION, GARY receive 2.40 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 69% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BENZION, GARY is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 46% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by BENZION, GARY. This interview benefit is in the 12% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 50.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 75.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 94% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 0% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 3% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 40.0% of allowed cases (in the 96% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.