USPTO Examiner MARTIN RACHEL E - Art Unit 1657

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
18919965LACTOBACILLUS ACIDOPHILUS GOLDGUT-LA100 HAVING FUNCTIONS OF LIPID LOWERING, BLOOD GLUCOSE LOWERING AND WEIGHT LOSS AND APPLICATION THEREOFOctober 2024June 2025Allow820NoNo
18915656EVOLVED INTEGRASES AND METHODS OF USING THE SAME FOR GENOME EDITINGOctober 2024June 2025Allow821YesNo
18756561ANTI-FATIGUE LACTOBACILLUS COMPOSITION AND METHOD OF PROMOTING ANTI-FATIGUE PERFORMANCE AFTER AEROBIC EXERCISE OF SUBJECT IN NEED THEREOF BY USING THE SAMEJune 2024October 2025Allow1620NoNo
18722480SPINOSAD HIGH-YIELD STRAIN AND USE THEREOFJune 2024July 2025Allow1320YesNo
18713690METHOD FOR INHIBITING BIOGENIC HYDROGEN SULFIDE IN OILFIELDSMay 2024July 2025Allow1320NoNo
18588041CUPRIAVIDUS METALLIDURANS CML2, ITS PREPARATION, AND ITS BIOREMEDIATION METHOD FOR HEAVY METAL-CONTAMINATED ENVIRONMENTFebruary 2024September 2025Abandon1820NoNo
18681293COMPOSITION FOR THE TREATMENT AND PREVENTION OF THE ESCA DISEASEFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2430NoNo
18426195ESCHERICHIA COLI K-12 MG1655 BLBYZT6 AND APPLICATION THEREOFJanuary 2024March 2025Allow1440YesNo
18450812Anti-Fatigue Lactobacillus Composition and Use ThereofAugust 2023September 2024Abandon1311NoNo
18001257SEMAGLUTIDE DERIVATIVE, AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND APPLICATION THEREOFJune 2023March 2026Abandon3901NoNo
18339218CUTINASE HAVING IMPROVED ENZYMATIC ACTIVITYJune 2023December 2023Allow600NoNo
18333468COENZYME Q10 OILING AGENT, PREPARATION METHOD AND USE THEREOFJune 2023February 2026Abandon3241NoNo
18324416CELLULOSE SACCHARIFICATION METHODMay 2023October 2024Abandon1620NoNo
18035430FOKI NUCLEASE DOMAIN MUTANTMay 2023February 2026Allow3310NoNo
18135116METHOD OF PREPARING PROCOLLAGEN FROM FRESHWATER FISHApril 2023June 2025Abandon2630NoNo
18031556ENGINEERED MICROORGANISMS EXPRESSING ACETOACETYL- COA REDUCTASE VARIANTS AND METHODS FOR INCREASING PROPORTION OF 3-HYDROXYHEXANOIC ACID IN PHAApril 2023December 2024Allow2011YesNo
18186488LAMBDA-CARRAGEENASE MUTANT OUC-CGLA-DPQQ AND APPLICATION THEREOFMarch 2023January 2025Abandon2221NoNo
18172946GUIDE NUCLEIC ACID IDENTIFICATION AND METHODS OF USEFebruary 2023March 2026Abandon3610NoNo
18163866BACILLUS VELEZENSIS, FERMENTATION METHOD, FERMENTATION PRODUCT AND ITS APPLICATIONFebruary 2023September 2025Abandon3210NoNo
17907864KLEBSIELLA PNEUMONIAE AND USE THEREOFJanuary 2023November 2025Allow3920NoNo
18001243PROBIOTIC COMPOSITION FOR TREATMENT OF ORAL CANDIDA INFECTIONSDecember 2022March 2026Allow3920YesNo
17972906HYPOOSMOTIC STABILIZER FOR GENOMIC DNA OF GUT MICROBIOTA, AND PREPARATION METHOD AND USE THEREOFOctober 2022May 2025Abandon3140NoNo
17919762A chimeric endolysin polypeptideOctober 2022October 2024Abandon2301NoNo
17904939LACTOBACILLUS HELVETICUS STRAIN AND COMPOSITION CONTAINING SAME FOR PREVENTION OR TREATMENT OF INFLAMMATORY DISEASESAugust 2022July 2025Allow3520YesNo
17801604BACTERIAL CULTURES FOR INCREASING VITAMIN B12 IN PLANTSAugust 2022September 2025Allow3720YesNo
17758676ANTI-TUMOR FUSION PROTEIN, PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR AND APPLICATION THEREOFJuly 2022December 2025Allow4120NoNo
17781500SPLIT DEAMINASE BASE EDITORSJune 2022March 2026Abandon4621NoNo
17780712A METHOD FOR THE TRANSFORMATION OF A LIQUID SUBSTRATE COMPRISING MICROORGANISMS, INTO A SUBSTANCE IN SOLID STATE AND RELATIVE SUBSTANCEMay 2022January 2026Abandon4301NoNo
17773533METHOD OF TREATING INFECTIONS BY BACTERIOLYTIC ENZYMES AND MANUFACTURE THEREOFApril 2022September 2025Allow4021YesNo
17770591RECOMBINANT NEURAMINIDASE AND USES THEREOFApril 2022February 2026Allow4621NoNo
17769596MICROBIAL COMPOSITIONS, STRAINS AND METHODSApril 2022March 2026Allow4730NoNo
17762570MANNANASE FOR FORMULATIONS HAVING PH 5-12March 2022September 2025Abandon4120NoNo
17640187COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR REDUCING CHROMATIN CONTENT OF BIOLOGICAL PREPARATIONSMarch 2022November 2025Abandon4520NoNo
17753367ESCHERICHIA COLI-BASED RECOMBINANT STRAIN, CONSTRUCTION METHOD THEREFOR AND USE THEREOFFebruary 2022May 2025Allow3920YesNo
17638340DETERGENT COMPOSITIONFebruary 2022February 2025Abandon3610NoNo
17638118Recombinant Chorionic Gonadotropin, Procedure for Preparation, Pharmaceutical Compositions and Uses of the SameFebruary 2022April 2025Allow3820NoNo
17633991OPTIMIZED CULTURE MEDIA FOR CLOSTRIDIA BACTERIAFebruary 2022September 2024Abandon3110NoNo
17633192METHOD FOR PREPARING PURE PLANT-BASED MICROBIAL CULTUREFebruary 2022August 2025Abandon4310NoNo
17586930PROTEINS FOR STABILIZATION OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIALJanuary 2022May 2025Allow3921YesNo
17625602PHARMACEUTICAL COMPOSITION CONTAINING LYSOZYME AND USE THEREOFJanuary 2022July 2025Abandon4220YesNo
17568085PLANT PROTEIN-FURFURYL ALCOHOL WOOD ADHESIVE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOFJanuary 2022January 2025Abandon3730YesNo
17565813CANDIDA UTILIS DOUBLE GENE CO-EXPRESSION STRAIN FOR HYDROLYZING PROTEIN COMPONENTS IN KITCHEN WASTE AND CONSTRUCTION METHOD THEREOFDecember 2021December 2024Abandon3610NoNo
17562081Multifunctional lactobacillus capable of relieving pfoa toxic effects and application thereofDecember 2021May 2025Allow4021YesNo
17418653GENE EXPRESSION CASSETTE FOR EXPRESSING N-TERMINAL METHIONINE-TRUNCATED PROTEIN OF INTEREST AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING N-TERMINAL METHIONINE-TRUNCATED PROTEIN OF INTEREST BY USING SAMEDecember 2021December 2024Abandon4110NoNo
17620648BIFIDOBACTERIUM BIFIDUM BACTERIAL STRAIN, THE COMPOSITIONS THEREOF AND RELATED USESDecember 2021October 2025Abandon4640NoNo
17552103NAD(P) DEPOT FOR NAD(P)-DEPENDENT ENZYME-BASED SENSORSDecember 2021June 2025Allow4221YesNo
17596514COMPOSITION FOR AMELIORATION OF ANXIETY AND/OR STRESSDecember 2021October 2025Allow4630YesNo
17616842OLIVETOLIC ACID CYCLASE VARIANTS AND METHODS FOR THEIR USEDecember 2021May 2025Abandon4101NoNo
17616547ASPARAGINASE-BASED CANCER THERAPYDecember 2021March 2026Allow5140NoNo
17615556PROBIOTICS TO INHIBIT ENTERIC PATHOGENSNovember 2021August 2024Abandon3301NoNo
17595422ENZYMATIC PRODUCTION OF GLUCARIC ACID FROM GLUCURONIC ACIDNovember 2021February 2026Allow6030YesNo
17610352COMPOSITION FOR PRODUCING GLUCOSYLATED STEVIOL GLYCOSIDE INCLUDING GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASE AND METHOD OF PRODUCING GLUCOSYLATED STEVIOL GLYCOSIDE USING THE SAMENovember 2021May 2025Allow4220YesNo
17608437KAURENOIC ACID 13-HYDROXYLASE (KAH) VARIANTS AND USES THEREOFNovember 2021March 2025Allow4111YesNo
17604630EXTREME THERMOPHILIC BACTERIA OF THE GENUS CALDICELLULOSIRUPTOR SUITABLE FOR THE CONVERSION OF CELLULOSIC AND STARCHY BIOMASSOctober 2021March 2025Allow4110YesNo
17603627METHOD AND PROCESS LINE FOR PRODUCING A DEWATERED GLUTEN-CONTAINING FRACTIONOctober 2021December 2024Abandon3801NoNo
17440303MODIFIED AGROBACTERIUM STRAINS AND USE THEREOF FOR PLANT TRANSFORMATIONSeptember 2021May 2025Allow4431YesNo
17432201RING NUCLEASEAugust 2021May 2025Abandon4520NoNo
17429111PIC1 VARIANTS WITH IMPROVED SOLUBILITY AND METHODS OF USING THE SAMEAugust 2021September 2024Abandon3701NoNo
17426299RECOMBINANT DEAMIDATED GLIADIN POLYPEPTIDE ANTIGEN, RECOMBINANT ANTIGEN-EXPRESSING GENE, RECOMBINANT EXPRESSION VECTOR, AND PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOFJuly 2021February 2026Abandon5420NoNo
17424761STRAIN FOR PRODUCING NATTOKINASE AND PRODUCTION METHOD THEREFORJuly 2021July 2024Allow3610YesNo
17376613USE OF GALACTURONATE AND OR GALACTURONATE POLYMERS IN CONJUNCTION WITH CARBOHYDRATES TO CONTROL METABOLIC STATE OF ORGANISMSJuly 2021November 2024Allow4020YesYes
17418072E. COLI VARIANT STRAIN OR CORYNEBACTERIUM GLUTAMICUM VARIANT STRAIN PRODUCING L-AMINO ACIDS, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING L-AMINO ACIDS USING SAMEJune 2021November 2025Abandon5230NoNo
17297850UOX-ALBUMIN CONJUGATE WITH CERTAIN NUMBERS OF ALBUMIN CONJUGATED THERETO, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOFMay 2021October 2024Abandon4111NoNo
17297931PURIFICATION METHOD FOR RECOMBINANT PROTEINS AND NANOPARTICLESMay 2021August 2024Abandon3810NoNo
17295847MICROBIAL CYTOMETRIC MOCK COMMUNITIES AND USE THEREOF AS STANDARD IN FLOW CYTOMETRYMay 2021July 2024Abandon3801NoNo
17323383HUMAN DNASE FOR LUNG DISEASEMay 2021January 2025Abandon4420NoNo
13582372MASS SPECTROMETRIC MEASUREMENT OF B-LACTAMASE RESISTANCESDecember 2012September 2020Abandon60131YesYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner MARTIN, RACHEL E.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
1
(100.0%)
Examiner Reversed
0
(0.0%)
Reversal Percentile
1.0%
Lower than average

What This Means

With a 0.0% reversal rate, the PTAB affirms the examiner's rejections in the vast majority of cases. This reversal rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals face significant challenges here.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
3
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(66.7%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(33.3%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
91.3%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 66.7% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB face challenges. Ensure your case has strong merit before committing to full Board review.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner MARTIN, RACHEL E - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner MARTIN, RACHEL E works in Art Unit 1657 and has examined 26 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 42.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 41 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner MARTIN, RACHEL E's allowance rate of 42.3% places them in the 8% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by MARTIN, RACHEL E receive 2.08 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 55% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by MARTIN, RACHEL E is 41 months. This places the examiner in the 20% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +84.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by MARTIN, RACHEL E. This interview benefit is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 19.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 19% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 22.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 28% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows below-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. You may need to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 47% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 90% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 2% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.