USPTO Art Unit 2417 Prosecution Statistics

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
15902264CONTROL PLANE FOR SENSOR COMMUNICATIONFebruary 2018November 2019Allow2000YesNo
15750466SYSTEM INFORMATION BLOCK ENHANCEMENTSFebruary 2018August 2019Allow1810NoNo
15750366SOLUTION TEST METHOD AND SERVERFebruary 2018November 2019Allow2110NoNo
15523364INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHODApril 2017April 2020Allow3540NoNo
15466167FTM PROTOCOL ENHANCEMENTS FOR CHANNEL DELAY SPREADMarch 2017August 2018Allow1700NoNo
15294842MONITORING CONNECTIONS FOR DATA COMMUNICATIONSOctober 2016October 2018Allow2410NoNo
15152971ADAPTING CONTROL PLANE POLICING PARAMETERS DYNAMICALLYMay 2016August 2018Allow2720YesNo
15054045VARIABLE RATE CODING FOR ENABLING HIGH PERFORMANCE COMMUNICATIONFebruary 2016November 2017Allow2130NoNo
14882498COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMOctober 2015January 2018Allow2710NoNo
14869353METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RELATING TO QUALITY OF SERVICE IN WIRELESS NETWORKSSeptember 2015March 2016Allow610NoNo
14766514Antenna Selection in Coordinated Multipoint CommunicationsAugust 2015October 2017Allow2620YesNo
14815487GLOBAL VLAN SERVICESJuly 2015November 2016Allow1520YesNo
14763725PREDICTING CHANNEL STATEJuly 2015December 2017Allow2920YesNo
14599452METHOD OF BEAMFORMING AND 3D ANTENNA ARRAYJanuary 2015June 2016Allow1710YesNo
14375317METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING PACKET IN BROADCASTING SYSTEMJuly 2014November 2016Allow2830YesNo
14374934Peer, Application and Method for Detecting Faulty Peer in Peer-To-Peer NetworkJuly 2014October 2015Allow1510NoNo
14372975ROUTING GENERATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF FIBER CHANNEL OVER ETHERNETJuly 2014May 2015Allow1010NoNo
14355928METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING DATA USING EXTENSION CARRIER IN WIRELESS ACCESS SYSTEMMay 2014January 2016Allow2010NoNo
14355933DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING TDD DOWNLINK DATA IN AN LTE SYSTEMMay 2014September 2015Allow1700NoNo
13825800UPLINK CHANNEL ESTIMATION FOR A SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIOJune 2013May 2015Allow2520NoNo
13859254VARIABLE RATE CODING FOR ENABLING HIGH PERFORMANCE COMMUNICATIONApril 2013November 2015Allow3120NoNo
13789256METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EXCLUDING GUARANTEED BIT RATE TRAFFIC BEARERS FROM LTE UL FLOW CONTROLMarch 2013August 2015Allow3030NoNo
13789155UPLINK FEEDBACK CHANNEL REPORTING MECHANISM IN WIRELESS SYSTEMSMarch 2013December 2014Allow2110NoNo
13716742METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR POWER CONTROL IN A RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEMDecember 2012December 2015Allow3640YesNo
13717121INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONGESTION CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUMDecember 2012November 2014Allow2310NoNo
13714380SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMDecember 2012October 2015Allow3430NoNo
13712310WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS METHOD AND APPARATUSDecember 2012April 2015Allow2930NoNo
13638585METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE EFFICIENT TRANSMISSION OF CONTROL INFORMATION FOR SUPPORTING UPLINK TRANSMISSION USING MULTIPLE ANTENNASDecember 2012December 2014Allow2720NoNo
13711183RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION FEEDBACK METHOD AND DEVICEDecember 2012August 2014Allow2010NoNo
13685223PACKET RELAY APPARATUS AND MEASUREMENT METHOD FOR MEASURING DISCARD NUMBER OF DATA PACKETSNovember 2012June 2015Allow3120NoNo
13638184PARAMETER PREDICTION FOR AUTONOMOUS DSL SYSTEM CONFIGURATION PROFILE SELECTIONNovember 2012January 2015Allow2820NoNo
13609983PACKET COMMUNICATION METHOD AND EQUIPMENT THEREFORSeptember 2012February 2015Allow2930NoNo
13610087ROUTE DETERMINATION DEVICE, NODE DEVICE, AND ROUTE DETERMINATION METHODSeptember 2012October 2014Allow2520NoNo
13529032POWER CONTROL FOR LTE DEPLOYMENT IN UNLICENSED BANDJune 2012March 2015Allow3330NoNo
13528956Sharing Excess Committed Network Appliance ResourcesJune 2012September 2015Allow3930YesNo
13528949Transmission Method of FemtocellJune 2012June 2014Allow2410NoNo
13528756DISTRIBUTED ROUTING MECHANISMS FOR A VIRTUAL SWITCH ENABLED BY A TRILL-BASED FABRICJune 2012January 2015Allow3130YesNo
13424187UNREGISTERED MULTICAST (MC) PACKET FORWARDING TO MULTICAST ROUTER PORTSMarch 2012June 2014Allow2710YesNo
13172137ACTIVE-AVOIDANCE-BASED ROUTING IN A WIRELESS AD HOC NETWORKJune 2011June 2013Allow2310NoNo
12876548METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RELATING TO QUALITY OF SERVICE IN WIRELESS NETWORKSSeptember 2010June 2012Allow2110NoNo
12835168TRANSMISSION RATE CONTROL METHOD AND COMMUNICATION DEVICEJuly 2010September 2012Allow2610NoNo
12225399METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DATA PACKET ASSEMBLYApril 2010June 2012Allow4510NoNo
12519757METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING A ROUTE METRICNovember 2009August 2012Allow3810NoNo
12087327SELF-ADAPTING MECHANISM FOR MANAGING DATA STREAMS IN A MULTIPLE ACCESS SHARED NETWORKFebruary 2009March 2012Allow4430NoNo
12319690METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LINK LAYER SCHEDULING IN A MULTIPLE ACCESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMJanuary 2009January 2012Allow3630YesNo
12091445METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING SELECTED INTERLACE ACKNOWLEDGEMENT MESSAGES IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMSOctober 2008May 2011Allow3730NoNo
11957905METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RELATING TO QUALITY OF SERVICE IN WIRELESS NETWORKSDecember 2007May 2010Allow2910YesNo
11947408TRANSMISSION DEVICE AND HOME SERVER SYSTEMNovember 2007March 2010Allow2800YesNo
11278175GENERATING A PATH INVENTORY FOR A COMMUNICATION NETWORKMarch 2006December 2009Allow4520YesNo
11365446METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR COLLECTING SURVEY DATA VIA THE INTERNETMarch 2006September 2011Allow6060YesYes

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for art-unit 2417.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
1
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(100.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
99.5%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Art Unit 2417 - Prosecution Statistics Summary

Executive Summary

Art Unit 2417 is part of Group 2410 in Technology Center 2400. This art unit has examined 50 patent applications in our dataset, with an overall allowance rate of 100.0%. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Comparative Analysis

Art Unit 2417's allowance rate of 100.0% places it in the 99% percentile among all USPTO art units. This art unit has a significantly higher allowance rate than most art units at the USPTO.

Prosecution Patterns

Applications in Art Unit 2417 receive an average of 1.84 office actions before reaching final disposition (in the 45% percentile). The median prosecution time is 27 months (in the 66% percentile).

Strategic Considerations

When prosecuting applications in this art unit, consider the following:

  • The art unit's allowance rate suggests a more favorable examination environment compared to the USPTO average.
  • With fewer office actions than average, plan for relatively streamlined prosecution.
  • The median prosecution time is shorter than average and should be factored into your continuation and client communication strategies.
  • Review individual examiner statistics within this art unit to identify examiners with particularly favorable or challenging prosecution patterns.

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.