Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15902264 | CONTROL PLANE FOR SENSOR COMMUNICATION | February 2018 | November 2019 | Allow | 20 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15750466 | SYSTEM INFORMATION BLOCK ENHANCEMENTS | February 2018 | August 2019 | Allow | 18 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15750366 | SOLUTION TEST METHOD AND SERVER | February 2018 | November 2019 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15523364 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS AND INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | April 2017 | April 2020 | Allow | 35 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 15466167 | FTM PROTOCOL ENHANCEMENTS FOR CHANNEL DELAY SPREAD | March 2017 | August 2018 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 15294842 | MONITORING CONNECTIONS FOR DATA COMMUNICATIONS | October 2016 | October 2018 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 15152971 | ADAPTING CONTROL PLANE POLICING PARAMETERS DYNAMICALLY | May 2016 | August 2018 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15054045 | VARIABLE RATE CODING FOR ENABLING HIGH PERFORMANCE COMMUNICATION | February 2016 | November 2017 | Allow | 21 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 14882498 | COMMUNICATION APPARATUS, COMMUNICATION METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | October 2015 | January 2018 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14766514 | Antenna Selection in Coordinated Multipoint Communications | August 2015 | October 2017 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14815487 | GLOBAL VLAN SERVICES | July 2015 | November 2016 | Allow | 15 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14763725 | PREDICTING CHANNEL STATE | July 2015 | December 2017 | Allow | 29 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14599452 | METHOD OF BEAMFORMING AND 3D ANTENNA ARRAY | January 2015 | June 2016 | Allow | 17 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14375317 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING PACKET IN BROADCASTING SYSTEM | July 2014 | November 2016 | Allow | 28 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 14374934 | Peer, Application and Method for Detecting Faulty Peer in Peer-To-Peer Network | July 2014 | October 2015 | Allow | 15 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14372975 | ROUTING GENERATION FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF FIBER CHANNEL OVER ETHERNET | July 2014 | May 2015 | Allow | 10 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14355928 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR RECEIVING DATA USING EXTENSION CARRIER IN WIRELESS ACCESS SYSTEM | May 2014 | January 2016 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 14355933 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING TDD DOWNLINK DATA IN AN LTE SYSTEM | May 2014 | September 2015 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 13825800 | UPLINK CHANNEL ESTIMATION FOR A SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO | June 2013 | May 2015 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13859254 | VARIABLE RATE CODING FOR ENABLING HIGH PERFORMANCE COMMUNICATION | April 2013 | November 2015 | Allow | 31 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13789256 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR EXCLUDING GUARANTEED BIT RATE TRAFFIC BEARERS FROM LTE UL FLOW CONTROL | March 2013 | August 2015 | Allow | 30 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13789155 | UPLINK FEEDBACK CHANNEL REPORTING MECHANISM IN WIRELESS SYSTEMS | March 2013 | December 2014 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13716742 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR POWER CONTROL IN A RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | December 2012 | December 2015 | Allow | 36 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13717121 | INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, CONGESTION CONTROL METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE RECORDING MEDIUM | December 2012 | November 2014 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13714380 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REDUCING POWER CONSUMPTION IN A WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM | December 2012 | October 2015 | Allow | 34 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13712310 | WIRELESS COMMUNICATIONS METHOD AND APPARATUS | December 2012 | April 2015 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13638585 | METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE EFFICIENT TRANSMISSION OF CONTROL INFORMATION FOR SUPPORTING UPLINK TRANSMISSION USING MULTIPLE ANTENNAS | December 2012 | December 2014 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13711183 | RADIO COMMUNICATION SYSTEM CHANNEL STATE INFORMATION FEEDBACK METHOD AND DEVICE | December 2012 | August 2014 | Allow | 20 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13638184 | PARAMETER PREDICTION FOR AUTONOMOUS DSL SYSTEM CONFIGURATION PROFILE SELECTION | November 2012 | January 2015 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13609983 | PACKET COMMUNICATION METHOD AND EQUIPMENT THEREFOR | September 2012 | February 2015 | Allow | 29 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13610087 | ROUTE DETERMINATION DEVICE, NODE DEVICE, AND ROUTE DETERMINATION METHOD | September 2012 | October 2014 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 13529032 | POWER CONTROL FOR LTE DEPLOYMENT IN UNLICENSED BAND | June 2012 | March 2015 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 13528956 | Sharing Excess Committed Network Appliance Resources | June 2012 | September 2015 | Allow | 39 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 13528949 | Transmission Method of Femtocell | June 2012 | June 2014 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 13528756 | DISTRIBUTED ROUTING MECHANISMS FOR A VIRTUAL SWITCH ENABLED BY A TRILL-BASED FABRIC | June 2012 | January 2015 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SONG, REBECCA E works in Art Unit 2417 and has examined 35 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 25 months.
Examiner SONG, REBECCA E's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 94% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by SONG, REBECCA E receive 1.86 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 40% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SONG, REBECCA E is 25 months. This places the examiner in the 77% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications move through prosecution relatively quickly with this examiner.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +0.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SONG, REBECCA E. This interview benefit is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Note: Interviews show limited statistical benefit with this examiner compared to others, though they may still be valuable for clarifying issues.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 46.9% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 96% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 37.5% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 0.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 2% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 14% percentile). This examiner rarely makes examiner's amendments compared to other examiners. You should expect to make all necessary claim amendments yourself through formal amendment practice.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 17% percentile). This examiner rarely issues Quayle actions compared to other examiners. Allowances typically come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.