USPTO Examiner SUNDARESAN RANJANI MARI - Art Unit 3792

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17117855ILLUMINATING DEVICE IMPLANTABLE IN A LIVING BEINGDecember 2020February 2024Allow3940NoNo
17113443DEVICE AND METHOD FOR STIMULATING PHOTO BIOCHEMICAL SYNTHESIS OF VITAMIN D3-CHOLECALCIFEROLDecember 2020December 2022Abandon2520NoNo
17111530METHOD OF TREATMENT OR PREVENTION OF KELOIDS AND HYPERTROPHIC SCARS USING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATIONDecember 2020October 2024Abandon4640YesNo
16953831PHOTOTHERAPY APPARATUS PREVENTING EYE EXPOSURE AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOFNovember 2020June 2022Abandon1910NoNo
16951403BEAM PROFILE CONVERTER, CATHETER DEVICE, AND LASER ABLATION DEVICENovember 2020March 2024Allow3920NoNo
17089863Ophthalmological Device For Intra-Capsular Fragmentation of a Lens NucleusNovember 2020December 2024Allow4940YesNo
17061212PORTABLE DEVICE FOR TREATING A PATIENT WITH LIGHT AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE PORTABLE DEVICEOctober 2020November 2023Abandon3840YesNo
17031746SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MODULATING CYTOKINE ACTIVITYSeptember 2020January 2025Abandon5240NoYes
17029466BIOINFORMATION ACQUIRING APPARATUS, BIOINFORMATION ACQUIRING METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUMSeptember 2020December 2023Allow3930YesNo
17040264OPTICAL STIMULATION SYSTEM WITH AUTOMATED MONITORING AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USINGSeptember 2020March 2023Abandon3020NoNo
16979223PHOTOTHERAPY DEVICE INCLUDE TWO OR MORE LIGHT PADS AND A FLEXIBLE GARMENTSeptember 2020May 2024Allow4430YesNo
17014201MYOPIA-PREVENTING ILLUMINATION APPARATUS FOR ILLUMINATING EYEBALLS AND SURROUNDING TISSUES VIA LIGHT THAT PENETRATING PERIORBITAL SKIN, SUBCUTANEOUS TISSUE,THEN PASS THROUGH CORNEA, IRIS, UVEA, SCLERA AND CHOROIDSeptember 2020November 2022Abandon2620NoNo
17008440CANCER TREATMENT SYSTEMAugust 2020July 2023Abandon3430YesNo
17002552Bolus Stimulation in a Neurostimulation Device Particularly Useful in Providing Sub-Perception StimulationAugust 2020March 2024Allow4240NoYes
16975150DARK FIELD REFLECTOMETRYAugust 2020May 2024Abandon4550YesNo
16995272METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN EYE SURGICAL LASER AND TREATMENT DEVICEAugust 2020February 2024Allow4230YesNo
16993287Sleep Quality Monitoring System for the Middle-aged and the ElderlyAugust 2020December 2023Abandon4010NoNo
16987400INPUT DEVICE OF SURGICAL MANIPULATOR, ROBOT-ASSISTED SURGICAL SYSTEM, AND CONTROLLERAugust 2020December 2024Allow5250YesNo
16964966System for Performing Laser Therapy and Method ThereforJuly 2020December 2023Allow4140NoYes
16964829PHOTODYNAMIC THERAPY DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODSJuly 2020September 2023Allow3850YesNo
16964234APPARATUS FOR CUTTING A HUMAN OR ANIMAL TISSUE COMPRISING AN OPTICAL COUPLERJuly 2020August 2024Abandon4950NoYes
16926653WEARABLE DEVICE FOR NON-INVASIVE THERAPY OF MAMMARY GLANDSJuly 2020January 2023Abandon3020NoNo
16961316DEVICE FOR REMOTELY MONITORING A PATIENT WITH CHRONIC HEART FAILURE, AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEM AND METHODJuly 2020July 2023Abandon3610NoNo
16922732Lumbar Laser Traction and Lumbar Laser Decompression TherapyJuly 2020October 2022Abandon2720NoNo
16920263INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAMJuly 2020October 2024Abandon5240NoNo
16769436MICROLENS ARRAY, AND LASER BEAM HAND PIECE AND THERAPEUTIC LASER DEVICE COMPRISING SAMEJune 2020February 2024Abandon4450YesNo
16767277MODULATING NEURAL ACTIVITY IN BRAINSTEM CIRCUITRY WITH LIGHTMay 2020June 2023Allow3640NoNo
16765150ILLUMINATION VARIABILITY REDUCTION IN LASER TREATMENT SYSTEMSMay 2020June 2024Abandon4930YesNo
16758832SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR REPOSITIONING INPUT CONTROL DEVICESApril 2020May 2024Allow4950YesNo
16849774CUSTOMIZABLE PATCHESApril 2020July 2024Abandon5140YesNo
16841073STRAIN GAUGE ASSEMBLY FORMED OF COMPONENTS HAVING TWO DIFFERENT STIFFNESSESApril 2020October 2023Abandon4220NoNo
16753706PATIENT INTERFACE SYSTEM, METHOD FOR COUPLING A PATIENT INTERFACE TO A PATIENT INTERFACE HOLDER, PATIENT INTERFACE, AND PATIENT INTERFACE HOLDERApril 2020May 2023Allow3830YesNo
16753340GLASSES PROVIDED WITH A PHOTON SOURCE, SYSTEM COMPRISING SUCH GLASSES AND USE OF SUCH GLASSES IN PHOTOTHERAPYApril 2020December 2021Abandon2010YesNo
16829978SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETECTING AND PREDICTING AN OCCURRENCE OF CARDIAC EVENTS FROM ELECTROCARDIOGRAMSMarch 2020December 2022Abandon3310NoNo
16644553ROBOTIC SYSTEM FOR MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERYMarch 2020September 2024Allow5450YesNo
16779368SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PAIN MANAGEMENTJanuary 2020October 2023Abandon4420NoNo
16741258Prescribed Neuromodulation Dose DeliveryJanuary 2020January 2024Abandon4840YesNo
16741196Spinal Cord Stimulation Occurring Using Monophasic Pulses of Alternating Polarities and Passive Charge RecoveryJanuary 2020July 2023Allow4330YesNo
16741242Tools To Assist Spinal Cord Stimulation Self-ReprogrammingJanuary 2020December 2023Allow4840YesYes
16741171Spinal Cord Stimulation for Dorsal Column Recruitment or Suppression Using Anodic and Cathodic PulsesJanuary 2020May 2024Allow5260YesNo
16741214Therapy Implemented Using Different Sub-Perception Neuromodulation TypesJanuary 2020October 2023Allow4530NoYes
16738786Fitting Algorithm to Determine Best Stimulation Parameter from a Patient Model in a Spinal Cord Stimulation SystemJanuary 2020December 2023Allow4740YesYes
16627425FACE-WEARABLE RHINITIS TREATMENT DEVICE USING LIGHT THERAPYDecember 2019March 2022Abandon2710NoNo
16711052SHIELDING FOR WRISTED INSTRUMENTSDecember 2019January 2024Allow4940YesNo
16687133PROBE UNIT AND ACOUSTIC WAVE RECEIVING SYSTEMNovember 2019December 2021Abandon2510NoNo
16687156TRUE ONSET IDENTIFICATIONNovember 2019July 2023Allow4440YesNo
16614640SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR TREATING SKINNovember 2019January 2024Allow5040YesNo
16609916PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION TRANSMISSION SYSTEM, PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION DETECTION SENSOR, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND PHYSIOLOGICAL INFORMATION TRANSMISSION METHODOctober 2019February 2024Allow5160NoNo
16596911METHOD OF TRANSMISSION BY A WATCH OF AN INFORMATION MESSAGE RELATING TO AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SLEEP QUALITY OF A USER OF SAID WATCHOctober 2019January 2025Allow6070YesNo
16582062PHOTOTHERAPY DEVICE AND PHOTOTHERAPY METHODSeptember 2019October 2024Abandon6060YesNo
16486136IMPROVED LIGHT THERAPY SYSTEM AND METHODS OF USEAugust 2019June 2023Allow4630YesYes
16527962SYSTEMS, DEVICES, AND RELATED METHODS FOR LASER LITHOTRIPSYJuly 2019March 2024Allow5550YesNo
16477798UVB LIGHT THERAPY FOR IMMUNE DISORDERSJuly 2019October 2021Abandon2710NoNo
16506415Interchangeable Tool HandleJuly 2019March 2024Allow5640YesNo
16505680Smart Surgical Laser Tissue Sealing And Cutting Apparatus With Optical Fiber Guided SensorsJuly 2019November 2021Abandon2810NoNo
16503892DIRECTIONAL ELECTRICAL STIMULATION LEADS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPINAL CORD STIMULATIONJuly 2019April 2023Abandon4541YesNo
16502973Methods, Systems, and Devices that Estimate Remaining Longevity of an Implanted Medical Device with Improved AccuracyJuly 2019June 2023Allow4740YesNo
16502084HEADER HAVING RADIOGRAPHIC MARKERJuly 2019December 2023Allow5460NoYes
16460569SUPERVISED CARDIAC EVENT DETECTIONJuly 2019June 2023Allow4850YesNo
16460275STRESS BIOMARKER AND HEALTH INDICATOR SYSTEMJuly 2019September 2024Allow6061YesYes
16460858VENOUS ABLATION CATHETER AND METHODJuly 2019July 2024Abandon6050NoNo
16438433UPCONVERSION FLUORESCENCE-BASED PHOTOBIOMODULATIONJune 2019March 2023Abandon4510NoNo
16463925SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND FLEXIBLE OPTICAL WAVEGUIDES FOR SCLERAL CROSSLINKINGMay 2019July 2023Abandon5040NoNo
16338880A HAIR CUTTING DEVICE USING PULSED RADIATIONApril 2019March 2022Abandon3610NoNo
16179003DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR NOTIFYING OF VARIANCESNovember 2018October 2024Abandon6040YesNo
15757765THERAPEUTIC SUBSTANCE DELIVERY DEVICE AND THERAPEUTIC SUBSTANCE DELIVERY KITMarch 2018May 2023Allow6040YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner SUNDARESAN, RANJANI MARI.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
13
Allowed After Appeal Filing
6
(46.2%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
7
(53.8%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
75.0%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 46.2% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner SUNDARESAN, RANJANI MARI - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SUNDARESAN, RANJANI MARI works in Art Unit 3792 and has examined 66 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 48.5%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SUNDARESAN, RANJANI MARI's allowance rate of 48.5% places them in the 12% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SUNDARESAN, RANJANI MARI receive 3.47 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 91% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SUNDARESAN, RANJANI MARI is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 14% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +40.0% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by SUNDARESAN, RANJANI MARI. This interview benefit is in the 86% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 19.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 22% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 12.2% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 14% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 200.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 55.6% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 200.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 47% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 53% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions more often than average when claims are allowable but formal matters remain (MPEP § 714.14).

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prepare for rigorous examination: With a below-average allowance rate, ensure your application has strong written description and enablement support. Consider filing a continuation if you need to add new matter.
  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.
  • Request pre-appeal conferences: PACs are highly effective with this examiner. Before filing a full appeal brief, request a PAC to potentially resolve issues without full PTAB review.
  • Appeal filing as negotiation tool: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.