Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18653513 | Embedding Privacy Measures Into A Distributed Ledger | May 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18693136 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EFFICIENTLY MANAGING CALLOUTS | March 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18433292 | AUTOMATED CHANNEL MANAGEMENT FOR A SECOND-LAYER PAYMENT PROTOCOL NETWORK VIA DISCRETE OPTIMIZATION AND SIMULATION | February 2024 | January 2026 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18430580 | DEVICES, METHODS AND SYSTEMS OF BLOCKCHAIN APPLICATIONS COMPLETING REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS | February 2024 | January 2026 | Abandon | 23 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18407937 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VALIDATING TRANSACTIONS | January 2024 | February 2026 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18402547 | Managing Smart Contracts Using a Distributed Ledger | January 2024 | May 2025 | Allow | 17 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18395578 | Dynamic Multi-Party Computation for Securely Utilizing and Storing a Secret Data-Item | December 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18530588 | DIGITAL TRANSACTION APPARATUS, SYSTEM, AND METHOD WITH A VIRTUAL COMPANION CARD | December 2023 | October 2025 | Abandon | 23 | 0 | 1 | No | No |
| 18244607 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR NETWORK MODELLED DATA | September 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 28 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18273721 | PAYMENT SERVICE IMPLEMENTATION METHODS AND APPARATUSES | July 2023 | June 2025 | Allow | 23 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18343276 | NETWORK-LEVEL EXCHANGE MODIFICATION FOR NETWORK-BASED EXCHANGES | June 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18341557 | TOKEN TRANSFER VIA MESSAGING SERVICE OF WALLET APPLICATION | June 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 27 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18213762 | USING A CONVERSATION INTERFACE TO TRANSFER DIGITAL ASSETS | June 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18325030 | CONTINGENT PAYMENTS FOR VIRTUAL CURRENCIES | May 2023 | May 2025 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18201420 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR AUTHENTICATION OF RESOURCE TRANSFERS USING TOKENIZATION AS INDICATOR OF AUTHORIZED RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION | May 2023 | April 2025 | Allow | 23 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18199145 | Methods, Devices, and Systems for Creating and Managing Web3 App Credentials | May 2023 | March 2025 | Allow | 22 | 0 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18143901 | INCREASED NETWORK SECURITY USING A SECURE TOKEN EXCHANGE | May 2023 | July 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 18141871 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR A MULTI-LAYER, MULTI-CHANNEL APPROACH TO AUTHENTICATE USERS AND TRANSACTIONS IN PUBLIC AND PRIVATE NETWORK SETTINGS | May 2023 | June 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18141561 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ENHANCED NON-FUNGIBLE TOKENS | May 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 18134981 | AUTOMATICALLY PAIRING PHYSICAL ASSETS TO A NON-FUNGIBLE TOKEN OR DIGITAL ASSET | April 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18126037 | STORAGE AND CONSUMPTION OF SOFTWARE BILL OF MATERIALS ON PUBLIC BLOCKCHAIN | March 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17721042 | SYSTEM, METHOD AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR GENERATING AND UTILIZING STABLE VALUE DIGITAL ASSETS | April 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 41 | 1 | 1 | Yes | No |
| 17669373 | DIGITAL CHECKS | February 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17554349 | PAYMENT VERIFICATION METHOD AND PAYMENT VERIFICATION SYSTEM | December 2021 | September 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17365094 | APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING AND/OR FOR FACILITATING SECURED AND/OR ON-LINE CAMPAIGNS, ELECTIONS, AND/OR VOTING ACTIVITIES | July 2021 | February 2025 | Allow | 43 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17282738 | ELECTRONIC VOTING ASSISTANT | April 2021 | May 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner SAX, TIMOTHY PAUL works in Art Unit 3698 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 33.3%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 45 months.
Examiner SAX, TIMOTHY PAUL's allowance rate of 33.3% places them in the 5% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by SAX, TIMOTHY PAUL receive 3.67 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SAX, TIMOTHY PAUL is 45 months. This places the examiner in the 13% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 20.0% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 100.0% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 45% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.