USPTO Examiner COBB MATTHEW - Art Unit 3698

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17256605DIGITAL CURRENCY SETTLEMENT SYSTEM AND SETTLEMENT METHOD AND PAYMENT DEVICEDecember 2020June 2023Abandon3020NoNo
17254152SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ISSUING AND TRADING CATASTROPHE BONDSDecember 2020April 2024Abandon4040YesNo
17052944Controlling Transactions on a NetworkNovember 2020June 2023Allow3230YesNo
17081685TRANSACTION AUTHENTICATION, AUTHORIZATION, AND/OR AUDITING UTILIZING SUBSCRIBER-SPECIFIC BEHAVIORSOctober 2020March 2024Allow4140YesNo
17066234SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR USE IN FACILITATING NETWORK MESSAGINGOctober 2020April 2023Allow3020YesNo
17024332SYSTEM AND METHOD LINKING TO ACCOUNTS USING CREDENTIAL-LESS AUTHENTICATIONSeptember 2020August 2023Allow3520YesNo
16997987Systems and Methods For Preventing Fraudulent Credit Card And Debit Card TransactionsAugust 2020September 2022Allow2510YesNo
16991756SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CHIP-BASED IDENTITY VERIFICATION AND TRANSACTION AUTHENTICATIONAugust 2020March 2023Allow3110YesNo
16965545System and Method for Biometric Fallback AuthenticationJuly 2020October 2022Allow2720YesNo
16938742METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR FACILITATING RISK CONTROL OF AN ONLINE FINANCIAL PLATFORMJuly 2020August 2022Allow2500YesNo
16918490SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PARALLELLY VALIDATING A PLURALITY OF POLICIESJuly 2020July 2022Allow2420YesNo
16913693SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING MULTI-FACTOR AUTHENTICATION FOR VEHICLE TRANSACTIONSJune 2020July 2022Allow2520YesNo
16888130METHOD OF DETERMINING WHETHER OR HOW TO PRESENT LOAN OFFER TO USER, INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUS, AND NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUMMay 2020November 2022Abandon3040YesNo
16874181Systems and Methods For Obtaining Data AnnotationsMay 2020April 2022Allow2310YesNo
16851065Universal Intelligent Module For Communications, Transactions, and PaymentsApril 2020January 2022Abandon2120NoNo
16841768RECORDING MEDIUM RECORDED WITH INFORMATION PROCESSING PROGRAM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND INFORMATION PROCESSING APPARATUSApril 2020January 2022Allow2120YesNo
16837868SYSTEM AND METHODS FOR PROCESSING AND AUTHORIZATION OF REAL-TIME RESOURCE REQUESTSApril 2020December 2023Abandon4530NoNo
16806041METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF TERMINAL DEVICESMarch 2020April 2022Allow2610YesNo
16796569TRANSACTION SYSTEM DATA MANAGEMENTFebruary 2020July 2022Abandon2920YesNo
16796249System and Method of Providing and Recording Personalized Context-Specific Advice in the Form of an Artificial Intelligence View of a Hierarchical PortfolioFebruary 2020April 2022Allow2610YesNo
16791993ILLICIT PROCEEDS TRACKING SYSTEMFebruary 2020June 2022Allow2830YesNo
16789115COMPUTING SYSTEM FOR OPTIMIZING INVESTMENT OF LIQUID GUARANTEED INCOME ASSETSFebruary 2020October 2022Allow3231YesNo
16783713MINIMIZATION OF THE CONSUMPTION OF DATA PROCESSING RESOURCES IN AN ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION PROCESSING SYSTEM VIA DEFERRAL OF PHYSICAL DELIVERYFebruary 2020December 2021Allow2220NoNo
16635721BIOMETRIC AUTHENTICATION PAYMENT SYSTEM, PAYMENT SYSTEM, AND CASH REGISTER SYSTEMJanuary 2020June 2022Allow2920YesNo
16635375CREDIT INFORMATION PROVIDING SERVER DEVICE, CREDIT INFORMATION PROVIDING METHOD, AND RECORDING MEDIUMJanuary 2020October 2022Abandon3240YesNo
16775420Currency Exchange System and MethodologyJanuary 2020October 2023Allow4520YesNo
16731708RULE ENGINE OPTIMIZATION VIA PARALLEL EXECUTIONDecember 2019October 2022Allow3421YesNo
16716090CONNECTED HOME SYSTEM WITH RISK UNITSDecember 2019March 2022Allow2720NoNo
16714348UTILIZING SENSOR DATA FOR AUTOMATED USER IDENTIFICATIONDecember 2019April 2023Allow4020YesNo
16660350Dynamic Currency Conversion Selection and Control ProcessingOctober 2019April 2022Allow3021NoNo
16660642AUTHENTICATION AT ATM AND HANDSHAKE BETWEEN CUSTOMER AND DRIVEROctober 2019January 2022Allow2720YesNo
16656652INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, PROGRAM, AND CONTROL METHODOctober 2019February 2022Abandon2820NoNo
16598062METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR SUPPORTING QR CODE TRANSACTIONSOctober 2019January 2022Allow2720NoNo
16591715Gesture-Controlled Payment InstrumentOctober 2019May 2021Allow2000YesNo
16589229TRANSPORTATION AND FREIGHT CAPACITY UNITSOctober 2019January 2022Abandon2810NoNo
16589723User Definable Prioritization of Market InformationOctober 2019June 2021Allow2010YesNo
16585328ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR AUTOMATED USER IDENTIFICATIONSeptember 2019November 2023Allow5040YesNo
16584796TRIGGERING TRANSACTIONS BASED ON PREDEFINED EVENTSSeptember 2019August 2022Abandon3420YesNo
16583189SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE AND TRANSFERSeptember 2019July 2021Allow2220YesNo
16542931Entity Prioritization and Analysis SystemsAugust 2019July 2021Allow2320YesNo
16542799Systems for Generation of Liability Protection PoliciesAugust 2019July 2022Allow3540NoNo
16537466SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AN ONLINE MEDIA MARKETPLACEAugust 2019June 2021Abandon2210NoNo
16537518SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING AN APPLICATION PROGRAMMING PRIVATE DATA TRANSACTIONSAugust 2019March 2021Allow1910YesNo
16533095MERCHANT POINT OF SALE COLLABORATING WITH PAYMENT READER TERMINAL VIA SERVER APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACEAugust 2019August 2021Allow2420YesNo
16508619SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMBINING PRODUCT SPECIFIC DATA WITH CUSTOMER AND MERCHANT SPECIFIC DATAJuly 2019April 2022Allow3340YesNo
16453046VALUE TRANSFER BETWEEN DISPARATE SYSTEMSJune 2019April 2023Allow4620YesNo
16428785System and Method for Fraud Detection Using Event Driven ArchitectureMay 2019November 2021Allow3010YesNo
16428650PAYMENT PROCESSING METHOD AND APPARATUS USING AN INTERMEDIARY PLATFORMMay 2019January 2022Allow3220NoNo
16426505SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR BILLPAY USING CREDIT-BASED PRODUCTSMay 2019April 2023Allow4660YesNo
16424688Method and System for Detecting Use of Vehicle Safety SystemsMay 2019July 2021Allow2520YesNo
16424086Virtual Register Look Ahead EngineMay 2019July 2021Allow2620YesNo
16413245SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MANAGING INSURANCE PREMIUMS BASED UPON PEER-TO-PEER PROPERTY SHARINGMay 2019January 2022Allow3230YesNo
16411816SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERSONALIZING PAYMENT CARDSMay 2019February 2022Allow3321YesNo
16411555METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR PROVIDING SEAMLESS CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE TRANSACTIONSMay 2019March 2022Allow3440YesNo
16408141APP-INITIATED VOICE TRANSACTIONMay 2019August 2021Abandon2820YesNo
16370283BLOCKCHAIN LOAN TRANSACTION SYSTEMS AND METHODSMarch 2019June 2024Abandon6050YesNo
16365290SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING AND TRANSFERRING DIGITAL ASSETSMarch 2019January 2022Allow3430YesNo
16363216Equity Market Timing & Allocation SystemMarch 2019March 2021Abandon2411NoNo
16352550USER INTERFACE FOR INTERFACING WITH HUMAN USERSMarch 2019June 2021Allow2720YesNo
16297332AUTOMATIC VIRTUAL PURCHASE CARD CHARGE RECONCILIATION AGAINST REQUISITION IN AN ONLINE PROCUREMENT SYSTEMMarch 2019October 2021Allow3140YesNo
16296302System and Methodology for Designing and Implementing Strategic Trading OpportunitiesMarch 2019April 2022Abandon3730YesNo
16291595NACHA COMPLIANT SECURE FUND TRANSFERMarch 2019May 2021Abandon2720YesNo
16290526SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING REVERSE GIFT CARD TECHNOLOGYMarch 2019June 2021Abandon2820YesNo
16281163Systems and Methods for the Efficient Creation and Processing of Derivatives TradesFebruary 2019August 2021Abandon3020NoNo
16275581SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ISSUER-SPECIFIED DOMAIN CONTROLS ON A PAYMENT INSTRUMENTFebruary 2019July 2022Allow4141YesNo
16237208SYSTEMS AND METHODS FACILITATING ACCOUNT ACCESS DELEGATIONDecember 2018April 2021Allow2820YesNo
16231258Method of Providing Collateral Financed Premium for Insurance Policy and System ThereofDecember 2018April 2021Abandon2811NoNo
16178986LIMIT PURCHASE PRICE BY STOCK KEEPING UNIT (SKU)November 2018January 2023Allow5060YesNo
16170930FUNDS TRANSFER AUTHENTICATIONOctober 2018December 2021Allow3840YesNo
16167070VEHICLE BASED TRANSACTIONSOctober 2018November 2021Allow3740YesNo
16095580DOOR OPERATING SYSTEMOctober 2018May 2021Allow3020YesNo
16161812SECURE MOBILE CHECKOUT SYSTEMOctober 2018May 2021Allow3130YesNo
16147501Security Asset PacksSeptember 2018July 2021Allow3430YesNo
16121991DATABASE CONFIGURATION FOR ASSET TRANSFERSSeptember 2018July 2024Allow6060NoYes
16120388Configuration PlatformSeptember 2018June 2021Abandon3420NoNo
16119701Methods, System and Computer Program Product for Selectively Responding to Presentation of Payment Card InformationAugust 2018November 2022Allow5160YesNo
16117136Intelligent Dynamic Authentication and Event Processing SystemAugust 2018October 2021Allow3740YesNo
16118145ROUTING TRANSACTIONS TO A PRIORITY PROCESSING NETWORK BASED ON ROUTING RULESAugust 2018April 2021Allow3130YesNo
16041966DELAY-FREE MATCHING FOR DEEMPHASIZING EFFECTS OF SPEED DIFFERENTIALS AMONG PRICE-MAKERSJuly 2018August 2021Allow3620YesNo
15983630SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED CUSTOMER RECURRING PAYMENT PROCESSINGMay 2018July 2021Allow3820YesNo
15924408METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR VEHICLE VALUATION USING TELEMATICSMarch 2018July 2021Abandon4030NoNo
15917023SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IMPLEMENTING PAYMENT VIA QUICK RESPONSE (QR) CODEMarch 2018May 2021Allow3850YesNo
15915722System and Method for Processing and Adjudicating CouponsMarch 2018March 2024Abandon6040YesYes
15915900SUPPLEMENTAL DATA TRANSMISSION FOR NETWORK TRANSACTIONSMarch 2018June 2021Allow3950YesNo
15851117Systems and Methods for Providing Services to Network TrafficDecember 2017August 2021Abandon4420NoNo
15796334TRIP-SEGMENT PAYMENTS FOR VEHICLE INSURANCEOctober 2017March 2022Allow5231YesNo
15505652METHOD FOR PROCESSING A RECURRING TRANSACTION, CORRESPONDING DEVICE AND PROGRAMFebruary 2017June 2021Allow5130YesNo
14996415METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING PERSONALIZED USER EXPERIENCES IN COMPLIANCE WITH SERVICE PROVIDER BUSINESS RULESJanuary 2016March 2021Allow6021YesNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner COBB, MATTHEW.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
2
Examiner Affirmed
1
(50.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(50.0%)
Reversal Percentile
78.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 50.0% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
2
Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(50.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
1
(50.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
82.9%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 50.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner COBB, MATTHEW - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner COBB, MATTHEW works in Art Unit 3698 and has examined 88 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 73.9%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner COBB, MATTHEW's allowance rate of 73.9% places them in the 40% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by COBB, MATTHEW receive 2.57 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 71% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by COBB, MATTHEW is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +47.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by COBB, MATTHEW. This interview benefit is in the 91% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 32.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 70% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. Consider whether your amendments or new arguments are strong enough to warrant an RCE versus filing a continuation.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 9.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 33.3% of appeals filed. This is in the 6% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 90.9% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 89% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are frequently granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1002.02(c), various examiner actions are petitionable to the Technology Center Director, including prematureness of final rejection, refusal to enter amendments, and requirement for information. If you believe an examiner action is improper, consider filing a petition.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 40% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 47% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.