USPTO Examiner ANDERSON JOHN A - Art Unit 3698

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17128887DETERMINING STATUS OF BUILDING MODIFICATIONS USING INFORMATICS SENSOR DATADecember 2020April 2022Allow1610YesNo
17129894PEER-TO-PEER SCHOLARSHIP, MENTORSHIP, AND APPRENTICESHIP DISTRIBUTED APPLICATION, METHOD, AND SYSTEM USING A BLOCKCHAINDecember 2020September 2022Abandon2110NoNo
17113280AUTHORIZING USES OF GOODS OR SERVICES USING BONDING AGREEMENTDecember 2020November 2022Allow2420YesNo
17098823METHOD AND APPARATUS OF OBTAINING LOCATION INFORMATIONNovember 2020November 2021Allow1220YesYes
16949413METHOD FOR IMPROVING THE ENVIRONMENT BY PROVIDING INCENTIVES FOR PURCHASE, LEASE, RE-LEASE, RENTAL, OR SUBSCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY ZERO EMISSION, LOW EMISSION AND BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLESOctober 2020May 2022Abandon1810NoNo
17071823PROVIDING DIAGNOSTICS REGARDING DIFFERENCES BETWEEN TRUSTED RESOURCE VALUES AND HISTORICAL RESOURCE VALUESOctober 2020December 2022Allow2610NoNo
17031660METHOD, APPARATUS AND SYSTEM FOR PROCRSSING PAYMENT REQUEST FOR VIRTUAL COMMODITIES ON OPEN NETWORK PLATFORMSeptember 2020December 2021Allow1400NoNo
17030260SHARING AND USING PASSES OR ACCOUNTSSeptember 2020April 2023Allow3140YesNo
17016193SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING PRIMARY AND SECONDARY MOVEMENT USING SPECTRAL DOMAIN ANALYSISSeptember 2020April 2022Allow1910YesNo
16977814PAYMENT SERVICE APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING PRODUCT INFORMATION TO OFFLINE MERCHANT ON BASIS OF LOCATION INFORMATION AND SUPPORTING PAYMENT PROCESSING BASED ON VIRTUAL CURRENCY AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFSeptember 2020June 2022Allow2110NoNo
16947828MONITORED ALERTSAugust 2020September 2022Allow2530YesNo
16969345ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MAKING PAYMENT BY USING AUDIO MODULEAugust 2020October 2022Allow2620YesNo
16990834COST - ADJUSTING ORDER/QUOTE ENGINEAugust 2020May 2022Allow2220NoNo
16934173USE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR MOVING BODYJuly 2020October 2022Allow2620YesNo
16918159METHOD, APPARATUS AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR CONDUCTING A MULTI-STAGE VERIFICATIONJuly 2020April 2023Allow3440YesNo
16958235METHOD FOR SHARING, COLLECTING AND PROCESSING DATA AND RELATED SYSTEMJune 2020October 2022Abandon2710NoNo
16913884ANONYMOUS TRANSACTION SYSTEMJune 2020February 2023Abandon3220NoNo
16877650SPECIALIZED KEYPAD FOR PRE-STAGING COMPLEX TRANSACTIONSMay 2020July 2022Allow2621NoNo
16877251COMMERCE SYSTEMS HAVING INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC DELIVERY FEATURESMay 2020August 2022Allow2720YesNo
16864041Systems and Methods of Permanent Life Insurance Policy Side-by-side Comparison and Automated UnderwritingApril 2020June 2021Abandon1320YesNo
16758503METHOD FOR SERVICE RECORDING IN CONNECTION WITH MOBILE SERVICESApril 2020January 2022Allow2110YesNo
16856840Search Space Minimization for Computerized Time-Series Data Forecasting SystemApril 2020September 2022Allow2921YesNo
16857077BIOMETRIC IDENTIFICATION FOR PAYLOAD ASSOCIATION AND RETRIEVALApril 2020April 2023Allow3540YesNo
16827800NEURAL NETWORK BASED PREDICTION OF COMPETITION BEHAVIOUR IN ENERGY MARKETSMarch 2020November 2022Allow3220YesNo
16801517SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR INDICATING SECTIONS OF ELECTRONIC TAX FORMS FOR WHICH NARRATIVE EXPLANATIONS CAN BE PRESENTEDFebruary 2020August 2021Allow1810YesNo
16793821SYSTEMS, METHODS, DEVICES, AND COMPUTER READABLE MEDIA FOR ENABLING DIRECT ELECTRONIC PAYMENT TRANSFERSFebruary 2020July 2021Allow1720NoNo
16788768SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR EFFECTING APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACES FOR PERSONAL PAYMENT TRANSACTIONSFebruary 2020December 2021Abandon2310YesNo
16730644Adaptive System for Detecting Abusive AccountsDecember 2019April 2022Allow2720YesNo
16718884INSURANCE RISK SCORING BASED ON CREDIT UTILIZATION RATIODecember 2019June 2021Allow1800YesNo
16713958SYSTEM FOR INVOICE PROCESSING FOR OVERSEAS VENDORS AND CARRIERSDecember 2019February 2022Allow2610YesNo
16680463TOKENIZED DATA HAVING SPLIT PAYMENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR MULTIPLE ACCOUNTS IN A CHAIN TRANSACTIONNovember 2019December 2021Allow2610YesNo
16679787GUARANTEE FUND CALCULATION WITH ALLOCATION FOR SELF-REFERENCING RISKNovember 2019July 2021Allow2020NoNo
16677025MANAGEMENT OF PAYMENT PLAN DATA IN A DISTRIBUTED ENVIRONMENTNovember 2019June 2022Allow3150YesNo
16676067Computer-Implemented Apparatus and Method for Providing Information Concerning a Financial InstrumentNovember 2019February 2021Allow1620YesNo
16581614USER INTERFACES FOR MANAGING AN ACCOUNTSeptember 2019January 2023Allow4040YesYes
16496659METHOD FOR INSTANT ISSUANCE CARD PRODUCTIONSeptember 2019January 2022Allow2820YesNo
16578020SYSTEM FOR RESOURCE DISTRIBUTION WITHIN AN OFFLINE ENVIRONMENTSeptember 2019May 2021Allow2010NoNo
16532425METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING FINANCIAL CONTROL VALIDATION PROCESSESAugust 2019September 2021Abandon2620YesNo
16507981ELECTRONIC MONEY PAYMENT SYSTEM AND METHODJuly 2019June 2021Abandon2311NoNo
16388237GENERATING WEIGHTED INDICATIONS OF ENTITY PERFORMANCE PATTERNS AND CREDIBILITY DETERMINATIONS TO ENHANCE SECURITY AND CONTEXTUAL AWARENESS IN A TRANSACTION PLATFORMApril 2019July 2022Abandon3910NoNo
16235311PREPAID CARD FUNDING FOR SINGLE TRANSACTIONDecember 2018September 2022Allow4460YesNo
16206401GLOBAL CACHE TOOL SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ADDING NEW PAYEESNovember 2018May 2022Allow4140YesNo
16206842PROFILE GENERATION AND ASSOCIATION WITH MULTIPLE TRANSACTION CARDS CONTEMPORANEOUSLYNovember 2018December 2021Allow3731YesNo
16201096GEOLOCATION AND PHYSIOLOGICAL SIGNALS FOR TRANSACTION INITIATIONNovember 2018December 2021Allow3730YesNo
16195600SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PAYMENT INFORMATION ACCESS MANAGEMENTNovember 2018March 2021Allow2820YesNo
16302465METHOD AND SYSTEM OF USING VEHICLE DIAGNOSIS EQUIPMENT, AND VEHICLE DIAGNOSIS EQUIPMENTNovember 2018August 2023Abandon5721NoNo
16190673PEER-TO-PEER SCHOLARSHIP, MENTORSHIP, AND APPRENTICESHIP DISTRIBUTED APPLICATION, METHOD, AND SYSTEM USING A BLOCKCHAINNovember 2018April 2021Abandon2920NoNo
16188591ELECTRONIC DISCLOSURE DELIVERY SYSTEM AND METHODNovember 2018December 2021Allow3730YesNo
16185584METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OBTAINING CREDITNovember 2018April 2021Allow2920YesYes
16184007System, Method, and Computer Program Product for Event-Based Communication and MessagingNovember 2018May 2021Allow3020YesNo
16177249SECURE CONTAINER MUTUAL AUTHENTICATIONOctober 2018July 2021Allow3330YesNo
16141316Computer System and Computer-Implemented Method for Processing a Payment TransactionSeptember 2018April 2021Abandon3120NoNo
16029156SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ELECTRONIC FUNDS TRANSFER (EFT) SECURITYJuly 2018April 2021Allow3320YesNo
15953045SECURE CHECK CLEARANCE SYSTEMApril 2018September 2021Allow4140YesNo
15900433TOKENIZATION FOR PAYMENT DEVICESFebruary 2018September 2023Allow6061YesYes
15695568Method of Performing Transactions with Contactless Payment Devices Using Pre-Tap and Two-Tap OperationsSeptember 2017September 2021Allow4840YesNo
15583850TEMPLATE-DRIVEN DISTRIBUTED ELECTRONIC TRANSACTION DATA VALIDATORMay 2017July 2022Abandon6060YesNo
15464557REAL-TIME INTERBANK TRANSACTIONS SYSTEMS AND METHODSMarch 2017December 2021Allow5640YesNo
15457705System and Method for Obtaining and/or Maintaining Insurance CoverageMarch 2017June 2021Abandon5140YesNo
15387862SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SENDING AND RECEIVING MATH-BASED CURRENCY VIA A FIAT CURRENCY ACCOUNTDecember 2016April 2022Allow6060YesNo
15343073SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR TARGETED MARKETING AND CONSUMER RESOURCE MANAGEMENTNovember 2016January 2023Allow6080NoNo
15217218VIDEO-VOICE PREPARATION OF ELECTRONIC TAX RETURN SUMMARYJuly 2016January 2024Abandon6060YesYes
15146390FULL BALANCE SHEET ADVISORMay 2016April 2021Allow5940YesNo
15146376SOCIAL PAYMENTS RECIPIENT CAPTUREMay 2016July 2021Allow6040YesYes
15145253System for Monitoring and Using Data Indicative of Driver Characteristics Based on SensorsMay 2016March 2021Allow5840YesNo
14840337METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MATCHING BUYERS WITH SELLERS IN A MARKETPLACE TO FACILITATE TRADEAugust 2015February 2021Allow6040NoNo
14814385PREPARATION OF ELECTRONIC TAX RETURN WHEN ELECTRONIC TAX RETURN DATA IS REQUESTED BUT NOT PROVIDED BY TAXPAYERJuly 2015March 2021Allow6030YesYes
14576658CONTEXTUAL AUTHENTICATION SYSTEMDecember 2014October 2021Allow6080YesNo
14243536SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COLLATERAL MANAGEMENTApril 2014September 2021Abandon6080YesYes
14032841METHOD OF TRADING A BIDDABLE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENT WITH A VARIABLE MATURITY DATESeptember 2013August 2021Allow6061YesYes
12566452METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MANAGING REVISIONS AND TRACKING OF INSURANCE POLICY ELEMENTSSeptember 2009March 2021Allow6090YesYes
12388320MODIFYING CONTAINERIZED PROCESSING LOGIC FOR USE IN INSURANCE CLAIM PROCESSINGFebruary 2009April 2014Allow6040NoNo
12030046METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING FINANCIAL SERVICESFebruary 2008September 2013Allow6040YesNo
11487110METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETECTING DISTRIBUTED INTERNET CRIMEJuly 2006June 2013Allow6040NoYes
10492387BILLING METHOD AND DEVICE IN A CELLULAR PACKET RADIOCOMMUNICATION NETWORKApril 2004May 2009Abandon6070NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner ANDERSON, JOHN A.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
7
Examiner Affirmed
2
(28.6%)
Examiner Reversed
5
(71.4%)
Reversal Percentile
88.6%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 71.4% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
13
Allowed After Appeal Filing
5
(38.5%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
8
(61.5%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
63.8%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 38.5% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner ANDERSON, JOHN A - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner ANDERSON, JOHN A works in Art Unit 3698 and has examined 75 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 77.3%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 31 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner ANDERSON, JOHN A's allowance rate of 77.3% places them in the 46% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by ANDERSON, JOHN A receive 3.01 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 84% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by ANDERSON, JOHN A is 31 months. This places the examiner in the 57% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +32.2% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by ANDERSON, JOHN A. This interview benefit is in the 79% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner and should be strongly considered as a prosecution strategy. Per MPEP § 713.10, interviews are available at any time before the Notice of Allowance is mailed or jurisdiction transfers to the PTAB.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 26.8% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 48% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show below-average effectiveness with this examiner. Carefully evaluate whether an RCE or continuation is the better strategy.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 1.8% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 5% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 0.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 21% percentile among all examiners. Note: Pre-appeal conferences show limited success with this examiner compared to others. While still worth considering, be prepared to proceed with a full appeal brief if the PAC does not result in favorable action.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 56.2% of appeals filed. This is in the 29% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 11.1% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows below-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. Be prepared to fully prosecute appeals if filed.

Petition Practice

When applicants file petitions regarding this examiner's actions, 22.2% are granted (fully or in part). This grant rate is in the 11% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Note: Petitions are rarely granted regarding this examiner's actions compared to other examiners. Ensure you have a strong procedural basis before filing a petition, as the Technology Center Director typically upholds this examiner's decisions.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 40% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 47% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Prioritize examiner interviews: Interviews are highly effective with this examiner. Request an interview after the first office action to clarify issues and potentially expedite allowance.
  • Plan for RCE after final rejection: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments. Budget for an RCE in your prosecution strategy if you receive a final rejection.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.