Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17050325 | AUTONOMOUS GARDENING APPARATUS | January 2021 | April 2025 | Abandon | 54 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17080267 | AGRICULTURAL MACHINE WITH SYSTEM FOR CALCULATING A TERRAIN RELIEF AND METHOD FOR OPERATING AN AGRICULTURAL MACHINE | October 2020 | January 2024 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17076028 | VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE | October 2020 | March 2025 | Allow | 52 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17075950 | DISPLAY CONTROL UNIT AND NON-TRANSITORY TANGIBLE COMPUTER READABLE STORAGE MEDIUM | October 2020 | September 2024 | Abandon | 47 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17064698 | DEEP-LEARNING-BASED DRIVING ASSISTANCE SYSTEM AND METHOD THEREOF | October 2020 | June 2024 | Abandon | 44 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17029668 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR REDUCING THE ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION DUE TO A TRANSPORT ROUTE | September 2020 | October 2023 | Abandon | 37 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17020938 | SYSTEM FOR COOPERATIVE MOVEMENT CONTROL AND/OR MOVEMENT SUPERVISION OF MOBILE MEDICAL COMPONENTS | September 2020 | November 2023 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16966590 | WORK MACHINE CONTROL DEVICE AND WORK MACHINE CONTROL METHOD | August 2020 | April 2025 | Abandon | 57 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 16967012 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING WORK OF WORK VEHICLE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING TRAINED MODEL | August 2020 | February 2025 | Abandon | 55 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner STRYKER, NICHOLAS F works in Art Unit 3665 and has examined 9 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 22.2%, this examiner allows applications at a lower rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 47 months.
Examiner STRYKER, NICHOLAS F's allowance rate of 22.2% places them in the 3% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is less likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by STRYKER, NICHOLAS F receive 2.67 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 74% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by STRYKER, NICHOLAS F is 47 months. This places the examiner in the 11% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +16.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by STRYKER, NICHOLAS F. This interview benefit is in the 57% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 12.5% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 9% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 0.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 4% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 42% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.