Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19002590 | METHOD FOR PLACE RE-RECOGNITION OF MOBILE ROBOT BASED ON LIDAR ESTIMABLE POSE | December 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 15 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18887216 | HYBRID ELECTRIC VEHICLE | September 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18716392 | METHOD FOR CLASSIFYING THE MANOEUVRES PERFORMED BY AN AIRCRAFT BY SEGMENTATION OF TIME SERIES OF MEASUREMENTS ACQUIRED DURING A FLIGHT OF THE AIRCRAFT | June 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 22 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18658093 | INTELLIGENT SETTINGS OF ONBOARD SENSORS ON A VEHICLE | May 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 19 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18705345 | DATA COLLECTION FOR VEHICLE SENSOR DATA | April 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18612053 | AUTOMATIC DRIVING CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD THEREOF | March 2024 | March 2026 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18593983 | BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE | March 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18426669 | INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD | January 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 21 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18508993 | AIRCRAFT ENGINE STARTER HAVING AN INTEGRATED DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM | November 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18491230 | VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR AUTOMATED VEHICLE PLATOON DRIVING | October 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18546844 | METHOD FOR ASSISTIVE OR AUTOMATED VEHICLE CONTROL | August 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18450572 | MOBILE UNIT MANAGEMENT DEVICE, MANAGEMENT METHOD, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | August 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 27 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18222426 | APPARATUS FOR DRIVER ASSISTANCE AND METHOD FOR DRIVER ASSISTANCE | July 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18222384 | PREDICTION OF ROAD GRADE FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE NAVIGATION | July 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18270549 | CONTROL DEVICE AND CONTROL METHOD | June 2023 | December 2025 | Abandon | 30 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18343839 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF DETECTING FLUID RELEASE | June 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18335457 | ADVANCED DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEMS SENSOR RING NETWORK | June 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 33 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18193119 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IDENTIFYING INTERSECTIONS AND CONTROLLING VEHICLES AT INTERSECTIONS | March 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18183040 | YIELD PREDICTION MODEL TO COMPUTE AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TRAJECTORIES | March 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 35 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18041882 | METHOD FOR ADJUSTING THE SPEED OF A VEHICLE | February 2023 | November 2025 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18097478 | DRIVING MODIFICATION TO DECREASE CARBON | January 2023 | October 2025 | Allow | 33 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18154252 | HARVESTER IMPLEMENT WITH AUTOMATED OPERATING MODE INITIALIZATION | January 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18053073 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR SENSOR DATA ANALYSIS | November 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 36 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17908926 | Object Location Information Provisioning for Autonomous Vehicle Maneuvering | September 2022 | December 2025 | Abandon | 39 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17874923 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SPRINKLER HEAD DETECTION | July 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17811957 | BATTERY TEMPERATURE CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES | July 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 40 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 16963198 | Work Vehicle with Antenna Devices for Autonomous Travel | July 2020 | October 2025 | Allow | 60 | 4 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16390723 | AUTOMATIC TILTING VEHICLE | April 2019 | May 2021 | Allow | 25 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner PEKO, BRITTANY RENEE.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 0.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the bottom 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is less effective here than in most other areas.
⚠ Filing a Notice of Appeal shows limited benefit. Consider other strategies like interviews or amendments before appealing.
Examiner PEKO, BRITTANY RENEE works in Art Unit 3665 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.
Examiner PEKO, BRITTANY RENEE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by PEKO, BRITTANY RENEE receive 2.50 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 73% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PEKO, BRITTANY RENEE is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 100.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 98% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: This examiner frequently reconsiders rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 1207.01, all appeals must go through a mandatory appeal conference. Filing a Notice of Appeal may prompt favorable reconsideration even before you file an Appeal Brief.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.