USPTO Examiner KHANDPUR JAY - Art Unit 3665

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
17139802PREDICTIVE CONTROL SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLEDecember 2020November 2023Allow3510NoNo
17257522METHOD FOR SENSING AND PROCESSING THE CARRIAGEWAY CONDITION OF A CARRIAGEWAY ON WHICH A VEHICLE IS DRIVENDecember 2020February 2023Allow2520NoNo
17121829ELECTRONIC DEVICE FOR PREDICTION USING RECURSIVE STRUCTURE AND OPERATING METHOD THEREOFDecember 2020October 2023Allow3420NoNo
16973495Vehicle Control Apparatus, Vehicle Control Method, and Vehicle Control SystemDecember 2020December 2022Allow2420YesNo
17114113SENSOR CONTROLLER, SENSOR CONTROL METHOD, SENSOR CONTROL PROGRAMDecember 2020July 2023Allow3110NoNo
17106666EVENT DETERMINATION FOR VEHICLES AND OCCUPANTS OF MOBILITY PROVIDER ON MAAS PLATFORMNovember 2020April 2023Allow2910NoNo
17095525METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING LANE-LEVEL ROUTING OR MAPPING BASED ON VEHICLE OR USER HEALTH STATUS DATANovember 2020July 2023Abandon3210NoNo
17054738Method, Apparatus, Computer Program and Computer Program Product for Determining a Quality Characteristic, a Vehicle-Specific Friction Coefficient and a Friction Coefficient MapNovember 2020March 2023Allow2811NoNo
17054422METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING A PATH FOR A VEHICLENovember 2020August 2022Allow2110NoNo
17087089METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR VERIFYING RAIN EVENT WARNINGSNovember 2020August 2022Allow2210NoNo
17068922METHOD, COMPUTER PROGRAM, APPARATUS, VEHICLE, AND TRAFFIC ENTITY FOR UPDATING AN ENVIRONMENTAL MODEL OF A VEHICLEOctober 2020May 2023Allow3110NoNo
17043056SIMULATION SIGNATURE KEYS FOR ROBOTIC SIMULATIONSSeptember 2020July 2024Allow4620NoNo
17029420VEHICLE AND REMOTE OPERATION SYSTEMSeptember 2020March 2023Allow2910NoNo
17030273SPACE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ARCHITECTURESeptember 2020June 2023Allow3210NoNo
16976900TURN PATH VISUALIZATION TO IMPROVE SPATIAL AND SITUATIONAL AWARENESS IN TURN MANEUVERSAugust 2020August 2023Allow3630NoNo
16969184ROBOT CONTROL DEVICE, ABNORMALITY DIAGNOSIS METHOD, AND NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUMAugust 2020January 2024Allow4120YesNo
16967535ELECTRONIC DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR VEHICULAR COMMUNICATIONAugust 2020September 2024Abandon4930NoNo
16967476METHOD FOR PROVIDING STEERING ASSISTANCE FOR AN ELECTROMECHANICAL STEERING SYSTEM OF A MOTOR VEHICLE COMPRISING A REDUNDANTLY DESIGNED CONTROL DEVICEAugust 2020January 2024Allow4210NoNo
16985689PLATOONING SYSTEMAugust 2020March 2023Allow3120NoNo
16967474CONTROL DEVICE FOR POWER STEERING DEVICEAugust 2020August 2023Allow3600NoNo
16960959Driver Assistance Device, Driver Assistance Method, and Driver Assistance SystemJuly 2020May 2022Allow2220NoNo
16914298TECHNOLOGY TO GENERALIZE SAFE DRIVING EXPERIENCES FOR AUTOMATED VEHICLE BEHAVIOR PREDICTIONJune 2020February 2023Allow3210YesNo
16772897OPTICAL DEVICE, RANGE SENSOR USING OPTICAL DEVICE, AND MOBILE OBJECTJune 2020July 2023Allow3720NoNo
16893630Asynchronous Processing for Autonomous Vehicle Computing SystemsJune 2020April 2023Allow3530YesNo
16883823UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE SYSTEM AND COMMUNICATION METHODMay 2020September 2022Abandon2810NoNo
16764932METHOD FOR ADJUSTING FULLY AUTOMATIC VEHICLE GUIDANCE FUNCTIONS IN A PREDEFINED NAVIGATION ENVIRONMENT AND MOTOR VEHICLEMay 2020December 2022Allow3140YesNo
16870355TRAJECTORIES WITH INTENTMay 2020May 2023Allow3620YesNo
16851933METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR GENERATING AN AERIAL NAVIGATION ROUTE BASED ON A PAYLOAD SURVIVABILITY ESTIMATEApril 2020August 2022Allow2810YesNo
16817180VEHICLE OPERATION ASSISTANCEMarch 2020January 2023Allow3420YesNo
16646132REVERSING-ASSISTANCE SYSTEM AND A METHOD FOR ASSISTING REVERSINGMarch 2020February 2023Allow3540NoNo
16798841WORK SUPPORT DEVICE AND WORK SUPPORT METHODFebruary 2020April 2024Allow5010NoNo
16792505RECOGNITION SENSOR AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF, AUTOMOBILE, AUTOMOTIVE LAMP, OBJECT RECOGNITION SYSTEM, AND OBJECT RECOGNITION METHODFebruary 2020April 2023Allow3820NoNo
16637218APPARATUS FOR PROVIDING MAPFebruary 2020April 2023Abandon3820NoNo
16774451GATEWAY RETRIEVAL ALERT DEVICE FOR AIRCRAFT PUSHBACK OPERATIONSJanuary 2020October 2022Allow3310NoNo
16632713EMITTING DEVICE FOR A SCANNING OPTICAL DETECTION SYSTEM OF A VEHICLE, DETECTION SYSTEM, DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM, AND METHOD FOR OPTICALLY SCANNING A MONITORING REGIONJanuary 2020January 2023Allow3610NoNo
16741032PASSENGER AUTHENTICATION SYSTEM FOR A VEHICLEJanuary 2020July 2022Allow3010NoNo
16620517LASER SCANNING DEVICE AND LASER RADARDecember 2019April 2023Allow4020NoNo
16695897PROCESS AND SYSTEM FOR SENSOR SHARING FOR AN AUTONOMOUS LANE CHANGENovember 2019August 2022Allow3310YesNo
16694770INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMSNovember 2019September 2022Allow3310YesNo
16692498ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOFNovember 2019August 2022Abandon3310NoNo
16668264METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR CALIBRATING VEHICLE SENSORSOctober 2019June 2023Allow4330NoNo
16662622DRIVING ASSISTANCE DEVICE, DRIVING ASSISTANCE METHOD, AND PROGRAMOctober 2019February 2023Allow4030YesNo
16607933LIGHT IRRADIATION CONTROL APPARATUS AND METHOD OF LIGHT IRRADIATION CONTROLOctober 2019January 2023Allow3910YesNo
16600641Control System for Operator Controlled Vehicle SubsystemsOctober 2019December 2022Allow3830YesYes
16598026SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING DEVIATION ASSISTANCE ON AN INTEGRATED FLIGHT MANAGEMENT DISPLAYOctober 2019August 2022Allow3420NoNo
16572755METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING AN EQUIPPED AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE TO A DESTINATIONSeptember 2019June 2022Allow3321YesNo
16571048PROACTIVE VEHICLE SAFETY SYSTEMSeptember 2019February 2022Allow2930YesNo
16492803TARGET ARRANGEMENT, METHOD, AND CONTROL UNIT FOR FOLLOWING A TARGET VEHICLESeptember 2019January 2023Allow4130NoNo
16561578SEAT DETERMINING APPARATUS, SEAT DETERMINING METHOD, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM FOR DETERMINING SEATSeptember 2019September 2022Allow3730NoNo
16488719DETERMINING A MAXIMUM FRICTIONAL-CONNECTION COEFFICIENTAugust 2019December 2021Allow2820NoNo
16551089ELECTRONIC APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION FOR A VEHICLEAugust 2019May 2022Abandon3210NoNo
16545856VEHICLE TERMINAL AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOFAugust 2019April 2022Abandon3210NoNo
16485285DEVICE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING A VEHICLE AND VEHICLEAugust 2019December 2021Abandon2810NoNo
16525973SENSOR FUSION TARGET PREDICTION DEVICE AND METHOD FOR VEHICLES AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE DEVICEJuly 2019April 2023Allow4530NoNo
16479380FEEDBACK FOR AN AUTONOMOUS VEHICLEJuly 2019January 2022Allow3020YesNo
16509525EVENT PREDICTION SYSTEM, EVENT PREDICTION METHOD, RECORDING MEDIA, AND MOVING BODYJuly 2019February 2023Abandon4340YesNo
16504297Method of remotely obtaining drone footage.July 2019July 2021Allow2410NoNo
16457796SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR ROUTING DECISIONS BASED ON DOOR USAGE DATAJune 2019December 2022Allow4110YesNo
16472633SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM, UNMANNED FLYING OBJECT, AND SURVEILLANCE METHODJune 2019March 2022Abandon3320NoNo
16431347CONTROL SYSTEM FOR PLATOONING OF VEHICLESJune 2019November 2021Allow2920YesNo
16431292APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR PERFORMING ON-BOARD SELF DIAGNOSTICS FOR A HEAVY-DUTY VEHICLEJune 2019October 2021Allow2910YesNo
16427174AUTONOMOUS DRIVING SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR VEHICLES AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAMEMay 2019November 2021Allow2920YesNo
16420553METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING TIRE-TO-ROAD FRICTION IN A VEHICLEMay 2019October 2021Allow2920NoNo
16419511BLOOM FILTER ROUTE DECODINGMay 2019June 2021Allow2520YesNo
16349048CONTROL OF FLIGHT INFORMATION RECORDER OPERATIONMay 2019January 2022Abandon3320NoNo
16406887FLIGHT PATH DETERMINATIONMay 2019October 2022Abandon4140YesNo
16404180UAV Operation Route Planning Method, UAV Pesticide Spreading Method and DeviceMay 2019June 2022Allow3730NoNo
16342740VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICEApril 2019October 2021Allow3020NoNo
16381566CAR CONTROL DEVICE WAKE UP FOR ELECTRICALLY CONTROLLED PNEUMATIC TRAIN BRAKING SYSTEMSApril 2019October 2021Allow3120NoNo
16375886SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR THE CLASSIFICATION OF GEOGRAPHIC LOCATIONS BASED ON VEHICLE TRIP LOGSApril 2019November 2021Allow3130NoNo
16374295ROUTE SAFETY DETERMINATION SYSTEMApril 2019January 2022Allow3430YesNo
16364406VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICEMarch 2019September 2021Allow3020YesNo
16361584VEHICLE AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAMEMarch 2019October 2021Allow3130NoNo
16295700VEHICLE-TO-EVERYTHING COMMUNICATION-BASED LANE CHANGE COLLISION AVOIDANCE WARNINGMarch 2019February 2023Allow4850NoNo
16291610Efficient Teleoperation of Mobile Robots via Online AdaptationMarch 2019November 2021Allow3220NoNo
16287084SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR A FAILSAFE SYSTEM FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLESFebruary 2019September 2021Abandon3010NoNo
16284040PARKING CONTROL DEVICE AND PARKING CONTROL METHODFebruary 2019April 2021Allow2510YesNo
16274535METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING A VEHICLE PATHFebruary 2019August 2022Allow4250YesNo
16268784SYSTEMS FOR INCORPORATING LIDAR SENSORS IN A HEADLAMP MODULE OF A VEHICLEFebruary 2019December 2022Allow4610YesNo
16254013INTEGRATED CONTROL SYSTEM FOR VEHICLEJanuary 2019October 2021Allow3330YesNo
16238376NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION USING UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLEJanuary 2019September 2021Allow3221YesNo
16314352OPTIMAL PLANNER SWITCH METHOD FOR THREE POINT TURN OF AUTONOMOUS DRIVING VEHICLESDecember 2018February 2022Allow3720NoNo
16208400System and Method for Detecting Driver Tampering of Vehicle Information SystemsDecember 2018July 2023Allow5520NoYes
16305106VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM, VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD, AND VEHICLE CONTROL PROGRAMNovember 2018September 2021Abandon3420NoNo
16166930Orbiting Actuated Three-Dimensional Spinning SensorOctober 2018April 2021Allow2910NoNo
15945491LAYERED ARCHITECTURE FOR CUSTOMER PAYLOAD SYSTEMSApril 2018May 2021Abandon3810NoNo

Appeals Overview

This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KHANDPUR, JAY.

Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Decisions

Total PTAB Decisions
1
Examiner Affirmed
0
(0.0%)
Examiner Reversed
1
(100.0%)
Reversal Percentile
98.2%
Higher than average

What This Means

With a 100.0% reversal rate, the PTAB has reversed the examiner's rejections more often than affirming them. This reversal rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that appeals are more successful here than in most other areas.

Strategic Value of Filing an Appeal

Total Appeal Filings
2
Allowed After Appeal Filing
2
(100.0%)
Not Allowed After Appeal Filing
0
(0.0%)
Filing Benefit Percentile
99.1%
Higher than average

Understanding Appeal Filing Strategy

Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.

In this dataset, 100.0% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is in the top 25% across the USPTO, indicating that filing appeals is particularly effective here. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Strategic Recommendations

Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.

Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.

Examiner KHANDPUR, JAY - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KHANDPUR, JAY works in Art Unit 3665 and has examined 86 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 82.6%, this examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 33 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KHANDPUR, JAY's allowance rate of 82.6% places them in the 57% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has an above-average tendency to allow applications.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KHANDPUR, JAY receive 1.93 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 43% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KHANDPUR, JAY is 33 months. This places the examiner in the 48% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly slower than average with this examiner.

Interview Effectiveness

Conducting an examiner interview provides a +16.5% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KHANDPUR, JAY. This interview benefit is in the 56% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide an above-average benefit with this examiner and are worth considering.

Request for Continued Examination (RCE) Effectiveness

When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 41.4% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 93% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. If you receive a final rejection, filing an RCE with substantive amendments or arguments has a strong likelihood of success.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 39.1% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 61% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner shows above-average receptiveness to after-final amendments. If your amendments clearly overcome the rejections and do not raise new issues, consider filing after-final amendments before resorting to an RCE.

Pre-Appeal Conference Effectiveness

When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 66.7% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 58% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences show above-average effectiveness with this examiner. If you have strong arguments, a PAC request may result in favorable reconsideration.

Appeal Withdrawal and Reconsideration

This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 66.7% of appeals filed. This is in the 51% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner shows above-average willingness to reconsider rejections during appeals. The mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) provides an opportunity for reconsideration.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 36% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 42% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • RCEs are effective: This examiner has a high allowance rate after RCE compared to others. If you receive a final rejection and have substantive amendments or arguments, an RCE is likely to be successful.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.