Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18744525 | VEHICLE DIAGNOSTIC DATA | June 2024 | July 2025 | Abandon | 13 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18419029 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR CAPTURING INFORMATION OF A DRIVER ASSISTANCE SYSTEM | January 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 24 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18528387 | INDEPENDENT STEERING CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD | December 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 25 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18523919 | NAVIGATION PLANNING SYSTEM AND NAVIGATION PLANNING METHOD | November 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 26 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18462758 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING INFORMATION TO FIRST RESPONDERS AFTER A VEHICLE COLLISION | September 2023 | March 2026 | Allow | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18270774 | SPRINKLING VEHICLE CONTROL SYSTEM, SPRINKLING VEHICLE, AND SPRINKLING VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD | July 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18341344 | AUTOMATIC WATERCRAFT PILOTING SYSTEM AND AUTOMATIC WATERCRAFT PILOTING ASSIST METHOD | June 2023 | February 2026 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18203447 | Positional Load Door Monitoring System | May 2023 | August 2025 | Allow | 27 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 18301743 | PARKING ASSIST SYSTEM | April 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 32 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18296180 | WIRELESS ROADSIDE DEVICE, TRAFFIC COMMUNICATION SYSTEM, AND TRAFFIC COMMUNICATION METHOD | April 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 35 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18191007 | OPERATION MANAGEMENT APPARATUS | March 2023 | September 2025 | Allow | 29 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 18183455 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR IMPLEMENTING CONDITION-BASED ACTIONS IN AN AIRCRAFT | March 2023 | July 2025 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18180351 | OBJECTION DETECTION SYSTEM DEFINING A DYNAMIC REGION OF INTEREST | March 2023 | March 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18021534 | Navigation Using Computer System | February 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 35 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18160050 | DYNAMIC MODIFICATION OF PRE-DEFINED OPERATIONAL PLAN FOR AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE | January 2023 | September 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18156392 | BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM, CONTROL SYSTEM AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE HAVING BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM | January 2023 | March 2025 | Abandon | 26 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18154732 | SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING ANOMALOUS AIRCRAFT FLIGHTS FROM SURVEILLANCE DATA | January 2023 | January 2026 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18153722 | OBJECT CHARACTERISTIC DETERMINING DEVICE | January 2023 | November 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18096199 | VEHICLE CONTROL DEVICE, AUTONOMOUS DISTRIBUTED TRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEM, AND VEHICLE CONTROL METHOD | January 2023 | August 2025 | Abandon | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 18076790 | SERVER, VEHICLE, AND COMMUNICATION CONTROL METHOD | December 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 18008120 | ROUTE PROVISION DEVICE AND ROUTE PROVISION METHOD THEREOF | December 2022 | February 2026 | Abandon | 38 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 18072125 | Low Latency Vector Map Updates | November 2022 | September 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17919922 | Method For Determining At Least One Itinerary Between At Least Two Points According To A Personalized Exposome And Associated Application | October 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 28 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17956159 | CONTROL METHOD, CONTROL DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM | September 2022 | July 2025 | Abandon | 34 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17880909 | SYSTEM AND METHOD TO MEASURE AN ABSOLUTE WORKING HEIGHT OF A PLURALITY OF AGRICULTURAL ATTACHMENTS | August 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17787327 | DEVICE AND METHOD FOR AUTOMATIC PROPOSAL OF AIR-CONFLICT RESOLUTION | June 2022 | December 2025 | Allow | 42 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17787231 | INFORMATION PROCESSING DEVICE, MOBILE APPARATUS, INFORMATION PROCESSING SYSTEM, INFORMATION PROCESSING METHOD, AND PROGRAM | June 2022 | February 2025 | Abandon | 32 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17833729 | HYBRID VEHICLE FRONT END ACCESSORY DRIVE CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD | June 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17736762 | AUTO PARKING PLANNING SYSTEM AND METHOD | May 2022 | November 2024 | Abandon | 30 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17771213 | CONTROL METHOD FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE AND CONTROL DEVICE FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLE | April 2022 | November 2024 | Allow | 31 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17657753 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HOVERING CONTROL OF UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE IN TUNNEL | April 2022 | August 2025 | Allow | 41 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17655455 | Predictive Modeling of Aircraft Dynamics | March 2022 | November 2025 | Allow | 44 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17627005 | MODEL-BASED DESIGN OF TRAJECTORY PLANNING AND CONTROL FOR AUTOMATED MOTOR-VEHICLES IN A DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENT | January 2022 | October 2025 | Abandon | 45 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17572966 | ASSISTING REVERSE DRIVING OF A COMBINATION | January 2022 | December 2024 | Allow | 35 | 3 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17573436 | INPUT DEVICE | January 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17625280 | Method and Communication System for Supporting at Least Partially Automatic Vehicle Control | January 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 45 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 17597334 | IMPLEMENT HITCH CONTROL SYSTEM | January 2022 | February 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17622356 | WORK MACHINE | December 2021 | December 2024 | Abandon | 36 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17457614 | Air Vehicle Mission Deconfliction | December 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 31 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17531588 | SYNCHRONOUS IN-VEHICLE COMMUNICATION | November 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 45 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17601844 | MONITORING MODULE | October 2021 | August 2025 | Allow | 46 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17601601 | DRIVE CONTROL DEVICE AND DRIVE DEVICE FOR RAILWAY VEHICLE | October 2021 | October 2025 | Allow | 48 | 2 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17469155 | METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING MULTI-UNMANNED SURFACE VESSEL COLLABORATIVE SEARCH | September 2021 | November 2024 | Allow | 39 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17305984 | METHOD AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING WHETHER SHIP ENTERS TYPHOON CIRCLE AND ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT | July 2021 | September 2024 | Allow | 38 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17423224 | Method for Monitoring a Steering Device | July 2021 | January 2025 | Allow | 43 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 17154793 | Systems and Methods for Verifying Railcar Location | January 2021 | June 2025 | Allow | 53 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 17143729 | SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR DYNAMICALLY AUGMENTING RASTER CHARTS DISPLAYED ON A COCKPIT DISPLAY | January 2021 | July 2024 | Allow | 42 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 17140275 | FLIGHT LEG TERMINATION VISUALIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR FLIGHT LEG TERMINATION VISUALIZATION | January 2021 | February 2025 | Abandon | 49 | 2 | 1 | No | No |
| 17119896 | GUIDED INSPECTION WITH OBJECT RECOGNITION MODELS AND NAVIGATION PLANNING | December 2020 | August 2025 | Abandon | 56 | 6 | 0 | No | No |
| 17110538 | METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DETERMINING AN INITIAL EGO-POSE FOR INITIALIZATION OF SELF-LOCALIZATION | December 2020 | December 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 6 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 15734953 | METHOD AND VEHICLE MANAGER FOR MANAGING REMOTE-CONTROLLED VEHICLE | December 2020 | September 2024 | Allow | 45 | 4 | 0 | No | No |
| 17075356 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND SYSTEM FOR MACHINE LEARNING-BASED PERSISTENCE FILTERING | October 2020 | August 2024 | Allow | 46 | 3 | 0 | No | No |
| 17045414 | Bicycle with Bicycle Alarm and Method | October 2020 | September 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 4 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16967001 | METHOD FOR ESTIMATING THE POSITION OF A VEHICLE ON A MAP | August 2020 | July 2024 | Allow | 48 | 5 | 0 | No | No |
| 16942438 | IMAGE SENSOR FOR PROCESSING SENSOR DATA TO REDUCE DATA TRAFFIC TO HOST SYSTEM | July 2020 | November 2024 | Allow | 51 | 5 | 0 | Yes | No |
| 16915682 | DEEP LEARNING-BASED DETECTION OF GROUND FEATURES USING A HIGH DEFINITION MAP | June 2020 | October 2025 | Allow | 60 | 8 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16664452 | METHOD, SYSTEM, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR GENERATING MAP UPDATE DATA | October 2019 | January 2026 | Allow | 60 | 5 | 0 | Yes | Yes |
| 16590777 | METHOD FOR LOCATING A VEHICLE | October 2019 | January 2026 | Abandon | 60 | 5 | 0 | No | Yes |
| 16419128 | METHOD, APPARATUS, AND COMPUTER PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR IDENTIFYING BUILDING ACCESSORS | May 2019 | April 2025 | Abandon | 60 | 3 | 0 | No | Yes |
This analysis examines appeal outcomes and the strategic value of filing appeals for examiner KAZIMI, MAHMOUD M.
With a 33.3% reversal rate, the PTAB reverses the examiner's rejections in a meaningful percentage of cases. This reversal rate is above the USPTO average, indicating that appeals have better success here than typical.
Filing a Notice of Appeal can sometimes lead to allowance even before the appeal is fully briefed or decided by the PTAB. This occurs when the examiner or their supervisor reconsiders the rejection during the mandatory appeal conference (MPEP § 1207.01) after the appeal is filed.
In this dataset, 33.3% of applications that filed an appeal were subsequently allowed. This appeal filing benefit rate is above the USPTO average, suggesting that filing an appeal can be an effective strategy for prompting reconsideration.
✓ Appeals to PTAB show good success rates. If you have a strong case on the merits, consider fully prosecuting the appeal to a Board decision.
✓ Filing a Notice of Appeal is strategically valuable. The act of filing often prompts favorable reconsideration during the mandatory appeal conference.
Examiner KAZIMI, MAHMOUD M works in Art Unit 3665 and has examined 22 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 68.2%, this examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.
Examiner KAZIMI, MAHMOUD M's allowance rate of 68.2% places them in the 30% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner has a below-average tendency to allow applications.
On average, applications examined by KAZIMI, MAHMOUD M receive 3.55 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 94% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KAZIMI, MAHMOUD M is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Conducting an examiner interview provides a +10.7% benefit to allowance rate for applications examined by KAZIMI, MAHMOUD M. This interview benefit is in the 44% percentile among all examiners. Recommendation: Interviews provide a below-average benefit with this examiner.
When applicants file an RCE with this examiner, 18.2% of applications are subsequently allowed. This success rate is in the 17% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Insight: RCEs show lower effectiveness with this examiner compared to others. Consider whether a continuation application might be more strategic, especially if you need to add new matter or significantly broaden claims.
This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 17.6% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 20% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner rarely enters after-final amendments compared to other examiners. You should generally plan to file an RCE or appeal rather than relying on after-final amendment entry. Per MPEP § 714.12, primary examiners have discretion in entering after-final amendments, and this examiner exercises that discretion conservatively.
When applicants request a pre-appeal conference (PAC) with this examiner, 100.0% result in withdrawal of the rejection or reopening of prosecution. This success rate is in the 75% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: Pre-appeal conferences are highly effective with this examiner compared to others. Before filing a full appeal brief, strongly consider requesting a PAC. The PAC provides an opportunity for the examiner and supervisory personnel to reconsider the rejection before the case proceeds to the PTAB.
This examiner withdraws rejections or reopens prosecution in 40.0% of appeals filed. This is in the 8% percentile among all examiners. Of these withdrawals, 50.0% occur early in the appeal process (after Notice of Appeal but before Appeal Brief). Strategic Insight: This examiner rarely withdraws rejections during the appeal process compared to other examiners. If you file an appeal, be prepared to fully prosecute it to a PTAB decision. Per MPEP § 1207, the examiner will prepare an Examiner's Answer maintaining the rejections.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 38% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 41% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.