USPTO Examiner LEBLANC LORYN KORRINE - Art Unit 2972

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
35525552Photographing handleApril 2025March 2026Allow1000NoNo
29997763ProjectorApril 2025July 2025Allow310NoNo
29997359Eyeglass ArmApril 2025August 2025Allow500NoNo
29992114ProjectorMarch 2025January 2026Allow1100NoNo
29983158PROJECTORJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29983200Night vision deviceJanuary 2025October 2025Allow910NoNo
29982997PROJECTORJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29982998PROJECTORJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29982286DashcamJanuary 2025June 2025Allow610NoNo
29980027ProjectorDecember 2024January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29973903TRIPODNovember 2024June 2025Allow610NoNo
29971527ProjectorNovember 2024January 2026Allow1400NoNo
29971508MagnifierNovember 2024September 2025Allow1010NoNo
29971503MagnifierNovember 2024September 2025Allow1010NoNo
29968006EyewearOctober 2024June 2025Allow810NoNo
29966437EYEGLASSESOctober 2024October 2025Allow1200NoNo
29966530BANDOctober 2024October 2025Allow1200NoNo
29961126HEAD STRAP FOR EYEWEARSeptember 2024July 2025Allow1000NoNo
29957680PROJECTORAugust 2024January 2026Allow1700NoNo
29952623GLASSESJuly 2024July 2025Allow1211NoNo
29946097PROJECTORJune 2024January 2026Allow1910NoNo
29946094PROJECTORJune 2024January 2026Allow2000NoNo
29945155BEAM PROJECTORMay 2024June 2025Allow1300NoNo
29945140BEAM PROJECTORMay 2024June 2025Allow1300NoNo
29943502PROJECTORMay 2024June 2025Allow1300NoNo
35521037Photographic cameraApril 2024August 2025Abandon1500NoNo
29938288PROJECTORApril 2024August 2025Allow1610NoNo
29938286PROJECTORApril 2024September 2025Allow1610NoNo
35521437ProjectorApril 2024January 2026Allow2111NoNo
29929870BEAM PROJECTORFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1800NoNo
29929871BEAM PROJECTORFebruary 2024August 2025Allow1800NoNo
29929663PROJECTORFebruary 2024June 2025Allow1600NoNo
35519871Bodyworn camera stabilizerJanuary 2024September 2025Allow1910YesNo
29923712PROJECTORDecember 2023July 2025Allow1800NoNo
29919453PROJECTORDecember 2023June 2025Allow1900NoNo
35522519Camera insert for microscopesOctober 2023January 2026Allow2710YesNo
35522511Microscope with integrated cameraOctober 2023March 2026Allow3020YesNo
35522505Camera insert for microscopesOctober 2023March 2026Allow3020YesNo
35521091Hologram projectorMay 2023August 2025Allow2620NoNo
29871541BracketFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3200NoNo
29860603SUPPORT BRIDGE FOR CAMERASNovember 2022August 2025Allow3310NoNo
29858196Tripod with a fill lightOctober 2022June 2025Allow3110NoNo
29854496CAMERA STANDSeptember 2022September 2025Allow3510NoNo
29830997CAPTURE RINGMarch 2022December 2025Allow4500NoNo
29827534GIMBALFebruary 2022August 2025Allow4210NoNo
29749092SMART GLASSESSeptember 2020June 2025Allow5711YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner LEBLANC, LORYN KORRINE - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LEBLANC, LORYN KORRINE works in Art Unit 2972 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 57 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LEBLANC, LORYN KORRINE's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LEBLANC, LORYN KORRINE receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LEBLANC, LORYN KORRINE is 57 months. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 400.0% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.