Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.
| Application Number | Title | Filing Date | Disposal Date | Disposition | Time (months) | Office Actions | Restrictions | Interview | Appeal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 30009886 | BATTERY WITH CABLE | June 2025 | November 2025 | Allow | 4 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29997541 | WIRELESS POWER BANK | April 2025 | December 2025 | Allow | 8 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29997377 | Wireless charger | April 2025 | December 2025 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29994337 | Wireless charger | March 2025 | December 2025 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29994352 | WATCH CHARGER | March 2025 | December 2025 | Allow | 9 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 35522365 | Charger for oral cleansing device | August 2024 | January 2026 | Allow | 16 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 29955635 | WIRELESS CHARGING STATION | August 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29955484 | Charging Pad for a Wearable Computing Device | August 2024 | December 2025 | Allow | 16 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29940140 | Charger | April 2024 | November 2025 | Allow | 18 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29908624 | Electronic Device Charger | January 2024 | October 2025 | Allow | 21 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 35522274 | Battery charging case for mobile devices | September 2023 | February 2026 | Abandon | 29 | 1 | 0 | No | No |
| 35521544 | Bidet controller | July 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 18 | 2 | 0 | No | No |
| 29885753 | GOLF CART KEYLESS IGNITION SWITCH | February 2023 | December 2025 | Allow | 34 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29882645 | CIRCUIT BREAKER LOCKOUT ASSEMBLY | January 2023 | January 2026 | Allow | 36 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29881234 | CIRCUIT BREAKER | December 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 33 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29868912 | SOCKET | December 2022 | January 2026 | Allow | 37 | 0 | 0 | No | No |
| 29855745 | WIRE CONNECTOR | October 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 36 | 1 | 2 | No | No |
| 29866913 | ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR | September 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 37 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 29827180 | TRANSPORTATION POWER UNIT | February 2022 | September 2025 | Allow | 43 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 29826797 | CHARGING WAND | February 2022 | October 2025 | Allow | 44 | 1 | 1 | No | No |
| 29749813 | ELECTRICAL CONDUCTOR | September 2020 | October 2025 | Allow | 60 | 0 | 1 | Yes | No |
No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.
Examiner BAKER, CALEB MORGAN works in Art Unit 2972 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.
Examiner BAKER, CALEB MORGAN's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.
On average, applications examined by BAKER, CALEB MORGAN receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 1% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.
The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by BAKER, CALEB MORGAN is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.
Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.
Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 200.0% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.
Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:
Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.
No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.
Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.
Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.