USPTO Examiner DOMINO DANIEL J - Art Unit 2954

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29985374DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACEJanuary 2025November 2025Allow1010NoNo
29978172DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACEDecember 2024November 2025Allow1100NoNo
29972192DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACENovember 2024November 2025Allow1210NoNo
35521972Display Screen with Graphical User InterfaceJuly 2024December 2025Allow1720NoNo
35521942Display Panel with Graphical user interfaceJune 2024October 2025Allow1610NoNo
35521555Display Panel with an Animated Graphical User InterfaceFebruary 2024March 2026Allow2411NoNo
35523287Display screen with graphical user interfaceDecember 2023November 2025Allow2310NoNo
35523242Display screen with graphical user interfaceDecember 2023November 2025Allow2310NoNo
29851932DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH GROUP OF GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACESSeptember 2022October 2025Allow3800NoNo
29840702DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACEMay 2022October 2025Allow4101NoNo
29814765Display Screen or Portion Thereof with Transitional Graphical User InterfaceNovember 2021October 2025Allow4710NoNo
29813397DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH A TRANSITIONAL GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACEOctober 2021February 2026Allow5120NoNo
29811637DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH ANIMATED GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACEOctober 2021October 2025Allow4820NoNo
29808267DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACESeptember 2021December 2025Allow5110NoNo
29776216DISPLAY SCREEN OR PORTION THEREOF WITH GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACEMarch 2021November 2025Allow5530NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner DOMINO, DANIEL J - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner DOMINO, DANIEL J works in Art Unit 2954 and has examined 5 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 51 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner DOMINO, DANIEL J's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by DOMINO, DANIEL J receive 1.80 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 41% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues fewer office actions than average, which may indicate efficient prosecution or a more lenient examination style.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by DOMINO, DANIEL J is 51 months. This places the examiner in the 4% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 100.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 100% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 35% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.