USPTO Examiner PRATT MICHAEL AARON - Art Unit 2951

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
35525295Exhaust pipeMay 2025March 2026Allow1000NoNo
35524731Speedloader for rifle magazineMarch 2025February 2026Allow1000NoNo
29989673FISHING ROD REEL SEAT HOODFebruary 2025December 2025Allow1000NoNo
29989671FISHING ROD REEL SEAT BODYFebruary 2025December 2025Allow1000NoNo
29989676FISHING ROD GRIPFebruary 2025December 2025Allow1000NoNo
29989682FISHING ROD REEL SEAT BODYFebruary 2025December 2025Allow1000NoNo
29984908AIR GUNJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29984885AIR GUNJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29982526Thermal ScopeJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29982784DIGITAL NIGHT VISION DEVICEJanuary 2025January 2026Allow1200NoNo
29978718Fishing reelDecember 2024January 2026Allow1300NoNo
29978490Rear Decklid For A Motor VehicleDecember 2024December 2025Allow1200NoNo
29978122Removable Rail MountDecember 2024December 2025Allow1200NoNo
29977843Archery Bag TargetDecember 2024December 2025Allow1200NoNo
29973939FIREARM OPTIC RISER MOUNTNovember 2024November 2025Allow1200NoNo
29973155SUSPENSION SHOCK ABSORBER FOR ROAD VEHICLESNovember 2024December 2025Allow1300NoNo
29971225FISHING REELNovember 2024November 2025Allow1300NoNo
29971216FISHING REELNovember 2024November 2025Allow1300NoNo
29970631BULLET WITH FINSOctober 2024October 2025Allow1200NoNo
29969716Shock Body With BypassOctober 2024December 2025Allow1400NoNo
29966947THREE BLADE BROADHEAD ARROW WITH INTERCHANGEABLE BLADESOctober 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29966955THREE BLADE BROADHEAD ARROW WITH HORIZONTAL GROOVESOctober 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29965288Lift Mount for a Pickup TruckSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29965223FIREARMSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29964396HANDGUARDSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29963829PISTOLSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29962320ARROW VANESeptember 2024October 2025Allow1400NoNo
29962057TRUCK CAB LIGHTING DEVICESeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29962059TRUCK CAB LIGHTING DEVICESeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29961094MODEL VEHICLE SHOCK TOWERSeptember 2024September 2025Allow1200NoNo
29961098MODEL VEHICLE SHOCK TOWERSeptember 2024September 2025Allow1200NoNo
29959213CLAMPAugust 2024September 2025Allow1300NoNo
29958931MODEL VEHICLE STEERING ASSEMBLYAugust 2024August 2025Allow1200NoNo
29958957MODEL VEHICLE STEERING BELLCRANKAugust 2024August 2025Allow1200NoNo
29957163FIREARM SLIDEAugust 2024November 2025Allow1500NoNo
29956020Archery Bow Riser WeightAugust 2024September 2025Allow1300NoNo
29948832Vaporizer Device With CartridgeJune 2024October 2025Allow1600NoNo
35524314Gun sightMarch 2024February 2026Allow2300NoNo
29924399MULTIPLE-BARREL FIREARMJanuary 2024November 2025Allow2210NoNo
29922363SLING MOUNTDecember 2023June 2025Allow1700NoNo
29921437PISTOL SLIDEDecember 2023October 2025Allow2201NoNo
35523232ProjectileDecember 2023February 2026Allow1410NoNo
29914291FirearmOctober 2023August 2025Allow2210NoNo
29878444FIREARM OPTIC MOUNTJune 2023October 2025Allow2801NoNo
29889088FIREARM STOCKApril 2023November 2025Allow3121NoNo
29866556CASE FOR ELECTRONIC DEVICESeptember 2022October 2025Allow3700NoNo
35508136Ridge tileJanuary 2019November 2020Allow2200NoNo
29411657Adhesive-Backed Temporary Tattoo Cover Made of Flexible MaterialJanuary 2012October 2025Allow60111NoNo
12769317FIREARM HAND GUARD RAIL SYSTEMApril 2010July 2012Allow2700NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner PRATT, MICHAEL AARON - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner PRATT, MICHAEL AARON works in Art Unit 2951 and has examined 3 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 27 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner PRATT, MICHAEL AARON's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by PRATT, MICHAEL AARON receive 3.67 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 95% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues more office actions than most examiners, which may indicate thorough examination or difficulty in reaching agreement with applicants.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by PRATT, MICHAEL AARON is 27 months. This places the examiner in the 74% percentile for prosecution speed. Prosecution timelines are slightly faster than average with this examiner.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Expect multiple rounds of prosecution: This examiner issues more office actions than average. Address potential issues proactively in your initial response and consider requesting an interview early in prosecution.
  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.