USPTO Examiner KWON ARAM - Art Unit 2951

Examiner Information

Name: KWON, ARAM
Art Unit: 2951
Total Cases: 2
Last Active: March 2025

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29995085Sleep Sound MachineMarch 2025December 2025Allow900NoNo
29994864Mobile Phone StandMarch 2025December 2025Allow900NoNo
29994624MicrophoneMarch 2025December 2025Allow900NoNo
29993873Phone HolderMarch 2025December 2025Allow900YesNo
29970288WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICE FOR AUTOMOBILEOctober 2024October 2025Allow1210NoNo
29961981Combined Speaker and Projector LampSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1400NoNo
29960586WIRELESS CONNECTIVITY DEVICEAugust 2024October 2025Allow1400NoNo
29960621Tablet caseAugust 2024December 2025Allow1500NoNo
29959154Tablet caseAugust 2024October 2025Allow1400NoNo
29956761CHARGING CASE FOR WIRELESS EARPHONESAugust 2024November 2025Allow1600NoNo
29950067AUDIO PROCESSORJune 2024October 2025Allow1620NoNo
29948802SERVO AMPLIFIERJune 2024October 2025Allow1610NoNo
35522970Mobile phoneNovember 2023February 2026Allow2701NoNo
29898797PORTABLE WIRELESS COMMUNICATION DEVICEAugust 2023November 2025Allow2710NoNo
29879967Media Player DeviceJuly 2023October 2025Allow2701NoNo
29790249STAGE MICROPHONENovember 2021November 2025Allow4801NoNo
29804808MODULAR HANDHELD IMAGING DEVICEAugust 2021October 2025Allow5001NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner KWON, ARAM - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner KWON, ARAM works in Art Unit 2951 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner KWON, ARAM's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 99% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by KWON, ARAM receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by KWON, ARAM is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 100.0% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.