USPTO Examiner LAWRENCE SAMANTHA Q - Art Unit 2944

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
30026933Handoperated Medical InstrumentOctober 2025November 2025Allow100NoNo
30026609Surgical Tool Cutting BitOctober 2025December 2025Allow200NoNo
30020467Metal Fence Pole CoverAugust 2025January 2026Allow500NoNo
29985249SKIN ABRASION TOOLJanuary 2025December 2025Allow1100NoNo
29977765FENCE POST ANCHORING DEVICEDecember 2024December 2025Allow1200NoNo
29962075Modular High-Capacity BeamSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1400NoNo
29960955POST ANCHORSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1300NoNo
29953456TIBIAL PLATE WEDGEJuly 2024September 2025Allow1400NoNo
35521579Head of ultrasonic knife for surgeryMay 2024December 2025Allow1811NoNo
29931773Sidewalk Shed BeamMarch 2024January 2026Allow2200NoNo
29913581STABILIZEROctober 2023October 2025Allow2510NoNo
29913584NEWELOctober 2023October 2025Allow2510NoNo
29913587BALUSTEROctober 2023October 2025Allow2510NoNo
29913583BALUSTEROctober 2023October 2025Allow2510NoNo
29913586STABILIZEROctober 2023October 2025Allow2510NoNo
29904306BeamOctober 2023July 2025Allow2210NoNo
29877776CORNER POST FOR CEILING TRIM SYSTEMJune 2023October 2025Allow2910NoNo
29875954FRAME MEMBERMay 2023September 2025Allow2810YesNo
29891486BRACED BASE FOR A POLEMay 2023September 2025Allow2900NoNo
29850636TISSUE AND MEMBRANE PUNCHER FOR PERIODONTAL PLASTIC SURGERY AND REGENERATIVE PROCEDURESAugust 2022October 2025Allow3700NoNo
29847321MULTI-USE HAND TOOL FOR CAMPINGJuly 2022January 2026Allow4201NoNo
29837128Nasal DilatorMay 2022October 2025Allow4200NoNo
29833863Tongue Cleaner/ScraperApril 2022January 2026Abandon4510NoNo
29807908MYOFASCIAL RELEASE DEVICESeptember 2021November 2025Allow5000NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner LAWRENCE, SAMANTHA Q - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner LAWRENCE, SAMANTHA Q works in Art Unit 2944 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 50 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner LAWRENCE, SAMANTHA Q's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by LAWRENCE, SAMANTHA Q receive 0.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by LAWRENCE, SAMANTHA Q is 50 months. This places the examiner in the 5% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 200.0% of allowed cases (in the 100% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.