USPTO Examiner CASSELL LANDON THOMAS - Art Unit 2944

Examiner Information

Name: CASSELL, LANDON THOMAS
Art Unit: 2944
Total Cases: 1
Last Active: February 2025

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
29989353MassagerFebruary 2025January 2026Allow1100NoNo
29988924SEX TOYFebruary 2025December 2025Allow1000YesNo
29979050BEAUTY INSTRUMENTDecember 2024December 2025Allow1200NoNo
29971945Fascia GunNovember 2024December 2025Allow1300NoNo
29966410Skin Care DeviceOctober 2024November 2025Allow1300NoNo
29956670SCALP MASSAGERAugust 2024December 2025Allow1600NoNo
29954985MASSAGE DEVICEJuly 2024October 2025Allow1400NoNo
29928953MASSAGE DEVICEFebruary 2024January 2026Allow2300NoNo
29928569MASSAGE DEVICEFebruary 2024December 2025Allow2210YesNo
35523309Skin treatment apparatusDecember 2023January 2026Allow1300NoNo
29899252CONNECTORAugust 2023October 2025Allow2600NoNo
29897816Audio Cable ConnectorJuly 2023January 2026Allow3020NoNo
29895044Car Scan ToolJune 2023December 2025Allow3010YesNo
35517583Sex toyMarch 2023October 2024Abandon1611NoNo
29862781Massage CupDecember 2022December 2025Allow3610NoNo
29820618TOURNIQUETDecember 2021December 2025Allow4811YesNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner CASSELL, LANDON THOMAS - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner CASSELL, LANDON THOMAS works in Art Unit 2944 and has examined 1 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 48 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner CASSELL, LANDON THOMAS's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by CASSELL, LANDON THOMAS receive 1.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 9% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues significantly fewer office actions than most examiners.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by CASSELL, LANDON THOMAS is 48 months. This places the examiner in the 8% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 34% percentile). This examiner issues Quayle actions less often than average. Allowances may come directly without a separate action for formal matters.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.