USPTO Examiner SOROUSH AULA - Art Unit 2943

Recent Applications

Detailed information about the 100 most recent patent applications.

Application NumberTitleFiling DateDisposal DateDispositionTime (months)Office ActionsRestrictionsInterviewAppeal
30005734Toy for Domestic PetMay 2025August 2025Allow300NoNo
29993817Pet bedMarch 2025July 2025Allow400NoNo
29992857Pet Chew ToyMarch 2025July 2025Allow500NoNo
29982214BIRD HOUSEJanuary 2025August 2025Allow710NoNo
29969547Dog bedOctober 2024August 2025Allow1000NoNo
29965881Pet SofaSeptember 2024August 2025Allow1000NoNo
29962766Pet BedSeptember 2024October 2025Allow1400NoNo
29962765Pet BedSeptember 2024November 2025Allow1410NoNo
29959502COMBINATION PET BED AND REMOVABLE PET PROTECTION LAYERAugust 2024September 2025Allow1210NoNo
29958480Bicycle Pet SeatAugust 2024September 2025Allow1300NoNo
29909485Combination Animal Scratcher and MassagerAugust 2023October 2025Allow2700NoNo
29880811Watercraft pet seatJuly 2023October 2025Allow2710NoNo
29880261Combined Ant Nest with Trash Area and Water FeederJuly 2023August 2025Allow2510NoNo
29880093Pet TrainerJuly 2023October 2025Allow2700NoNo
29880090Pet TrainerJuly 2023October 2025Allow2700NoNo
35521699BeehiveJuly 2023January 2026Allow1800NoNo
29879497ANIMAL GROOMING DEVICEJuly 2023October 2025Allow2700NoNo
29895840Grooming Equipment for AnimalsJune 2023October 2025Allow2800NoNo
29878328DOG BED WITH A CANOPYJune 2023December 2025Allow2900NoNo
29892710Brooder BoxMay 2023November 2025Allow3020NoNo
29892458Orthopedic Dog Bed For Large DogMay 2023October 2025Allow2900NoNo
29876040CHICK BROODERMay 2023October 2025Allow2900NoNo
29891425Pet CarrierMay 2023November 2025Allow3010NoNo
29889190DESHEDDING BRUSHApril 2023October 2025Allow3000NoNo
29889191PET CLIPPERApril 2023October 2025Allow3000NoNo
29889187SLICKER BRUSHApril 2023October 2025Allow3000NoNo
29873738Pet cartApril 2023August 2025Allow2800NoNo
29888901PET NAIL GRINDERApril 2023September 2025Allow2900NoNo
29888449PET PAW WASHERMarch 2023October 2025Allow3100NoNo
29873035PET CARRIERMarch 2023October 2025Allow3110NoNo
29872363PET BAG FOLDING STANDMarch 2023October 2025Allow3100NoNo
29885981dog cageMarch 2023December 2025Allow3300NoNo
29871498Pet Play PenFebruary 2023October 2025Allow3200NoNo
29869672Raised Pet BedJanuary 2023October 2025Allow3301NoNo
29847933CRATEJuly 2022August 2025Allow3700NoNo
29847462CUSHION FOR PATIENT INTERFACEJuly 2022February 2023Allow610YesNo
29748355PLAY STRUCTURE FOR BROODERAugust 2020October 2025Allow6020NoNo
29726749CONTAINER FOR LIQUID PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTMarch 2020September 2025Allow6020NoNo

Appeals Overview

No appeal data available for this record. This may indicate that no appeals have been filed or decided for applications in this dataset.

Examiner SOROUSH, AULA - Prosecution Strategy Guide

Executive Summary

Examiner SOROUSH, AULA works in Art Unit 2943 and has examined 2 patent applications in our dataset. With an allowance rate of 100.0%, this examiner allows applications at a higher rate than most examiners at the USPTO. Applications typically reach final disposition in approximately 10000 months.

Allowance Patterns

Examiner SOROUSH, AULA's allowance rate of 100.0% places them in the 98% percentile among all USPTO examiners. This examiner is more likely to allow applications than most examiners at the USPTO.

Office Action Patterns

On average, applications examined by SOROUSH, AULA receive 2.00 office actions before reaching final disposition. This places the examiner in the 51% percentile for office actions issued. This examiner issues a slightly above-average number of office actions.

Prosecution Timeline

The median time to disposition (half-life) for applications examined by SOROUSH, AULA is 10000 months. This places the examiner in the 0% percentile for prosecution speed. Applications take longer to reach final disposition with this examiner compared to most others.

After-Final Amendment Practice

This examiner enters after-final amendments leading to allowance in 50.0% of cases where such amendments are filed. This entry rate is in the 76% percentile among all examiners. Strategic Recommendation: This examiner is highly receptive to after-final amendments compared to other examiners. Per MPEP § 714.12, after-final amendments may be entered "under justifiable circumstances." Consider filing after-final amendments with a clear showing of allowability rather than immediately filing an RCE, as this examiner frequently enters such amendments.

Examiner Cooperation and Flexibility

Examiner's Amendments: This examiner makes examiner's amendments in 0.0% of allowed cases (in the 32% percentile). This examiner makes examiner's amendments less often than average. You may need to make most claim amendments yourself.

Quayle Actions: This examiner issues Ex Parte Quayle actions in 100.0% of allowed cases (in the 99% percentile). Per MPEP § 714.14, a Quayle action indicates that all claims are allowable but formal matters remain. This examiner frequently uses Quayle actions compared to other examiners, which is a positive indicator that once substantive issues are resolved, allowance follows quickly.

Prosecution Strategy Recommendations

Based on the statistical analysis of this examiner's prosecution patterns, here are tailored strategic recommendations:

  • Consider after-final amendments: This examiner frequently enters after-final amendments. If you can clearly overcome rejections with claim amendments, file an after-final amendment before resorting to an RCE.
  • Plan for extended prosecution: Applications take longer than average with this examiner. Factor this into your continuation strategy and client communications.

Relevant MPEP Sections for Prosecution Strategy

  • MPEP § 713.10: Examiner interviews - available before Notice of Allowance or transfer to PTAB
  • MPEP § 714.12: After-final amendments - may be entered "under justifiable circumstances"
  • MPEP § 1002.02(c): Petitionable matters to Technology Center Director
  • MPEP § 1004: Actions requiring primary examiner signature (allowances, final rejections, examiner's answers)
  • MPEP § 1207.01: Appeal conferences - mandatory for all appeals
  • MPEP § 1214.07: Reopening prosecution after appeal

Important Disclaimer

Not Legal Advice: The information provided in this report is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. You should consult with a qualified patent attorney or agent for advice specific to your situation.

No Guarantees: We do not provide any guarantees as to the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of the statistics presented above. Patent prosecution statistics are derived from publicly available USPTO data and are subject to data quality limitations, processing errors, and changes in USPTO practices over time.

Limitation of Liability: Under no circumstances will IronCrow AI be liable for any outcome, decision, or action resulting from your reliance on the statistics, analysis, or recommendations presented in this report. Past prosecution patterns do not guarantee future results.

Use at Your Own Risk: While we strive to provide accurate and useful prosecution statistics, you should independently verify any information that is material to your prosecution strategy and use your professional judgment in all patent prosecution matters.